Copyright 2010 LibertyFight.com
Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich spoke at Claremont Colleges Wednesday night in Southern California and was questioned about the loss of liberties in America as well as his involvement in Bohemian Grove, Freemasonry, and the Council on Foreign Relations. The 66 year old 'establishment's man' responded by vehmently denying he belonged to such groups, even though he appears in the official "Annals of the Bohemian Club" , and was featured in a National Review column about 'the grove' in 1995. The article, written by William F. Buckley, Jr. and coincidentally dated September 11, 1995, was entitled "Newt draws fire- Newt Gingrich and the Bohemian Grove".
Gingrich spoke to a nearly full auditorium in the foothill community of Claremont, CA, which is located about 30 miles east of Los Angeles. He took unscreened questions from the crowd for about twenty minutes after his speech. The questioners, mostly college students, asked about such issues as health care legislation, women's role in politics, the "tea party" movement, and taxation. Near the end of questioning, a young woman asked Newt about a quote attributed to him in which he had stated that he 'is not a citizen of the world'.
He replied emphatically by stating that, although his words were controversial among some in his office, our rights as Americans come from a Creator and that "there is no world government". This view, though correct, is odd and seemingly disingenuous coming from Gingrich, an admitted member of the Council on Foreign Relations, a group whose known goal is the establishment of a world government. In response to another question regarding tea parties, Gingrich said that the victory of Republican Scott Brown for the U.S. Senate seat in Massachusetts was fueled to a large degree by the tea party movement.
At the end of the event after approximately one hundred people had lined up for a book signing, Gingrich's previous remarks regarding world government served as a perfect transition for questions about the "new world order". After he signed the program at my request with the words "To Martin: No World Government - Your Friend, Newt", I took the rare opportunity to question an off-guard Gingrich, opening with an initial softball question:
Q. "A lot in the tea party movement have decried the loss of liberties associated with the call for increased security. Do you have any comments on that?
Gingrich: "Uh I think that we should focus our security effort on those who are truly dangerous and not use it to harass innocent Americans".
Q. "You were asked about world government and you said 'there is no world government'. What is your role in groups like the bohemian club, freemasonry, and that sort of thing, Council on Foreign Relations?
Gingrich: "I don't belong to the Bohemian Club, I have no role in freemasonry. And my primary activity in Council on Foreign Relations was on figuring out how to fight terrorism"
Q. "So you don't think there's gonna be a 'new world order' so to speak?"
Gingrich: "No. No"
Q. "What do you think about Ron Paul, Mr. Speaker?"
Gingrich: "Interesting guy".
Gingrich, who became visibly defensive and blinked rapidly while replying to the questions, started to walk away during my questioning with the aide of the small entourage of faculty and assistants who accompanied him. Despite walking offstage and not wanting to talk to me anymore, he made a point to wave to me directly as I filmed him walking outside leaving the auditorium.
When confronted in 2007 regarding U.S. government involvement in the attacks of 9/11/01, Gingrich replied "Anyone who believes 9/11 was not an enemy attack is insane." Alleged to be a high level freemason ,and a long acknowledged member of California's occultic bohemian grove, Gingrich admitted agreement with Democrats on the issue of alleged "global warming" in 2008, stating "we do agree our country must take action to address climate change."
Also in 2008, in one of his more outrageous statements regarding terrorism, Gingrich suggested the government allow attacks, saying "...it’s almost like they should every once in a while have allowed an attack to get through just to remind us."
In 2008, 'MASH' actor and anti-war activist Mike Farrell was questioned at the same venue regarding government's involvement in 9/11: Mike Farrell: 9/11 was not a government conspiracy . Video of Gingrich's Feb 3, 2010 remarks on freemasonry, bophemian grove, etc. can be seen below.
Related:
Profile of admitted freemasons presently serving in U.S. Congress
Freemason William Bratton working for former Kroll, Inc CEO in ' federal government' security
Establishment pawns Rudy Giuliani, Colin Powell, and Condoleezza Rice to appear in Anaheim Feb. 17th
Arch criminals George Bush and Bill Clinton to appear together in Los Angeles Feb. 22
Commissioner Bob Kerrey confronted with questions regarding 9/11/01
Also:
Woman who threatened Michelle Obama likely a U.S.federal govt employee
Total government convictions for IRS 'tax crimes': 666
Why everyone should fight their traffic tickets: every time
Red light camera tickets defeated in CA
Arkansas State trooper meets videocam: it's not illegal to film police
How I beat a cell phone ticket in California
Comments
great work
Hey there,
I am looking at a 2010 guest list and his name is not on it.
Though not all people who are invited as "guests" are listed.
He may be technically right when he says he is not a "member."
For more info, including Arnolds visit to the Grove this year to give a lakeside taalk, please visit my blog:
thebohemiangroveblog(dot)wordpress(dot)com
(Full links are not allowed, add the regular http)
Why is this being presented like you caught him in some kind of 'gotcha'...?
He gave clear, comprehensive and plausible answers, none of which showed him to have done anything intemperant, sinister, or of the nature you're insinuating.
You cast aspersions upon his character by your suspicion, hoping to infect others by your lead. This type of behavior is despicable, and generally something expected only from those on the Left. You haven't exposed anything except Newt's generosity and kindness in signing your book as you requested, and in answering your questions, and you've repaid him with backstabbing, betrayal, and attempts to snipe him. Such behavior is not upstanding or respectable, and you my man, I would never desire to count among my friends... you are one scheming and, to some degree, troubled individual.
I read about him a long time ago and his connections with the one world network. He is very smart and I believe he is trying to deceive us. Only prayer will prevent him from carrying this deceit off.
He blinked rapidly?
Keep up the smear campaign. You'll end up with four more years of Obama.
I find it interesting that as a Catholic Pro-life advocate you seem convinced that Newt Gingrich is not what he seems; A Catholic Pro-life advocate.
I think that what we may have in Gingrich is a modern Saul/Paul. Gingrich has come home to the Church. He and his wife made the effort to make a documentary on JP II. He has named John Paul II in his debates. He attends Mass regularly; his wife sings in the choir. He was recently a guest on Piers Morgans talk show and stated his opposition to Roe v. Wade.
Abortion is the greatest tragedy in human history. It has destroyed more than fifty million lives in the U.S. and more than a billion lives world wide. Humanity has literally evolved into a state of self destruction. The Pro-life movement needs a figurehead to fight its battle and challenge to overturn Roe v. Wade. If President Obama is re-elected it will mean a further proliferation of self destruction. So, which candidate has the best chance to go toe to toe with Obama in the debates. Do you think the Obama team is excited about the prospect of their teleprompter president debating Gingrich? The Obama team wants to face off with Romney. Just examine what the media has done to every candidate that has challenged Romney in the polls. Gingrich is now the target.
The reason why Gingrich is the right candidate is because his faith has become greater than his intellect. And, I believe that he provides the best opportunity to overturn Roe v. Wade.
Mmm, I recently read that the Vatican would like to head up the new central world bank for the United Nations and the global NWO. I wonder if Newt, with all his CFR credentials is their man! I also read recently that Archbishop Dolan met with and was kissing up to Obama, even praising him. Last Sunday when I went to mass, all the homily was about was once again the priest manipulating the congregation for more money. Even trying to guilt them when most are either unemployed or seriously struggling. I wonder why the Catholic Church doesn't help the former middle class who is now poor, but was so quick to support (at least in the case of much of the USCCB), or at least not confront, Obama during his campaign? Remember Obama's appearances at Georgetown and Notre Dame? I wonder why the Catholic Church only gives charity to foreign '3rd world' causes instead of giving here in the U.S. (with the exception of illegal aliens of course). They don't ever seem to help any of the poor families I know struggling in the age of Obama. Just wondering. I think my friend we may be living in the age of apostasy.
BTW, Ron Paul is a way stronger pro-life candidate than Newt. He's also not full of it.
The real reason they don't want to abandon Afghanistan is, because of the Exxon Mobile's pipeline pumping oil from Afghanistan. George Bush Jr. brags he went to Iraq for the oil, to show off to his affluent friends. So instead of half the national deficit, we have it double, they want to build permanent bases in Iraq and Afghanistan, so big oil, and the Republican's can get rich. So why do they want to make Afghanistan a permanent duty station so they can protect the interest's of big oil and the pipeline, before they started drilling and pumping oil out of Afghanistan, the country was considered the largest untapped oil resource in the world. They don't talk much about the pipeline now because the Billionaire's and corporations have silence everyone. I don't vote and support neither party, nor will I be a registered voter, ever, because I never register to vote. George Bush Jr and the Republican party wanted to control the oil infrastructure of Iraq, and Afghanistan to enrich themselves, Billions traded for the corporations, while America accumulated Trillions in national debt, not such a good trade off, but it was for 1% of the population.
The people of Afghanistan live simple lives as farmers and ranchers, living off of mountain goats, and sheep's, and simple crops, too stupid to realize what they have an abundant source of natural resources that they do not benefit from, while Hamid Karzai hordes over 100 Billion in secret accounts for himself. The people of Afghanistan use horses and donkeys, and pick up trucks, as their main weapons, while military contractor's keep building new weapon system's for themselves and get richer, America goes down hill in debt.
China owns 11% of the national debt, and Japan owns 10% and they are over 200% over GDP in national debt. So who owns most of the national debt Private Security Firms profiting off the national debt of the U.S. They want to go to war with Iran that will cost the U.S. 90 Billion a year, instead of executing precision strikes. Like Iraq, they always have known, since they have too much oil, no economic sanction will work, and only by declaring a full scale war can they actually bring about change.The real reason they don't want to abandon Afghanistan is, because of the Exxon Mobile's pipeline pumping oil from Afghanistan. George Bush Jr. brags he went to Iraq for the oil, to show off to his affluent friends. So instead of half the national deficit, we have it double, they want to build permanent bases in Iraq and Afghanistan, so big oil, and the Republican's can get rich. So why do they want to make Afghanistan a permanent duty station so they can protect the interest's of big oil and the pipeline, before they started drilling and pumping oil out of Afghanistan, the country was considered the largest untapped oil resource in the world. They don't talk much about the pipeline now because the Billionaire's and corporations have silence everyone. I don't vote and support neither party. George Bush Jr and the Republican party wanted to control the oil infrastructure of Iraq, and Afghanistan to enrich themselves, Billions traded for the corporations, while America accumulated Tril
Someday when he becomes President he will start his world Genocide program.
Thank you for this article, and anyone standing up for Newt because they are afraid it will lead to an Obama win, still have their heads in the sand. A Newt win is an Obama win, there would be no difference. Ron Paul is the only one that can be trusted.
Got something to say?
Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!