
"Global Warming: Meltdown" is the latest television special from
Weather Channel founder John Coleman that discusses the
problems with the manmade climate change theory. (KUSI)
Watch the video below.
There is little doubt that John Coleman, founder of the Weather Channel, has strong feelings about manmade climate change. He has long railed against the theory calling it “the greatest scam in history.” Now a meteorologist for KUSI in San Diego, Coleman has continued his assault with a series of television specials, the latest of which aired last night.
The latest hour long special titled “Global Warming: Meltdown” walks through the arguments on both sides of the issue. From recent revelations of errors within the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) reports to discussions of faulty climate computer models, Coleman lays out the doubts about man’s influence on the climate reassuring viewers that, “Mankind is not destroying our planet.”
A brief recap of his previous special that aired last month, “Global Warming: The Other Side” kicks off the show and jumps into the IPCC errors. Al Gore, a favorite target for climate change skeptics, receives a jab or two and Coleman refers to the former vice president as “the pied piper of global warming.”
The seriousness of the debate however is clearly seen in the video as are some of the many questions that make the foundation of the manmade climate change theory. From climate computer models that have failed to account for recent cooling to extensive problems with surface temperature monitoring stations Coleman covers it all.
I guess you could have it both ways if you don’t have a very well defined theory.
~ John Christy on the claim that recent snow storms support the global warming theory
In an interview with John Christy, director of the Earth System Science Center at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, Christy addresses satellite data that does not support warming. He further discusses the recent severe weather that has seen snow records across the eastern United States. In response to some who have said those events actually support global warming, Christy said, “I guess you could have it both ways if you don’t have a very well defined theory.”
Anthony Watts, owner of the climate blog Watt’s Up With That, appears on the program to discuss the problems with surface monitoring stations. Watts and a team of volunteers discovered that the vast majority of these stations in the United States fail to meet the minimum requirements for the site on which they reside. Similar problems have been discovered in other countries as well.
While not appearing directly on the show, although they were offered the opportunity, the other side makes appearances through interviews from other sources.
Dr. Richard Somerville from the Scripps Institution of Oceanography outlines the basics of the foundation of the anthropogenic global warming theory saying, “once again this is solid, settled science. No reputable scientist, no expert in this field would dispute anything I’ve just said.”
Tom Peterson with the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) in Asheville, North Carolina admits the problems with surface stations records. He however contents that corrections have been made in the data to compensate.
New: Do you Buzz? Follow the Climate Change Examiner on Google Buzz!
KUSI has provided "Global Warming: Meltdown" in nine segments. You can watch each below.
Part 1 – Introduction and recap of previous special
Part 2 – Discussion of problems with IPCC reports
Part 3 – Other issues with IPCC reporting
Part 4 – Interview with Dr. Richard Somerville, Scripps Institution of Oceanography
Part 5 – Reply from the NCDC about first special and problems with climate stations
Part 6 – Minnesotans for Global Warming music video, list of scientists that disagree with the ‘consensus’
Part 7 – Anthony Watts discusses surface station records
Part 8 – Interview with John Christy, Argos buoys showing cooling of the oceans
Part 9 – Al Gore, recap of recent news
Climate Change Examiner Facebook Page Climate Change Examiner on Twitter
Or be notified by email when a new article from the Climate Change Examiner is posted.
Click the 'Subscribe' link at the top or bottom of the article and enter your email address.













Comments
The warmists serve up a veritable potpourri of logical fallacy: argumentum ad hominem, argumentum ab auctoritate, proof by numbers, circular proof,...
This paper by Menne analyzes the D'Aleo and Watts data to show a bias that you might not expect. The surface stations actually underestimate the effects of temperature.
www1.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/ushcn/v2/monthly/menne-etal2010.pdf
Check the facts. Global warming is happening and man is resonsible.
DJ144 I agree about checking the facts and would recommend you investigate more about the Menne paper. That has been shown to hardly be an accurate evaluation of the surface station data from Watts. The Menne paper used only 43% of the data Watts has collected (selective use of data again by NCDC?) and did not use the quality-controlled version. After approaching Watts, Menne refused to work with him to provide an accurate evaluation. That is a shame. You might want to read more about it here:
wattsupwiththat.com/2010/01/27/rumours-of-my-death-have-been-greatly-exaggerated/
Parts 1, 2 and 3 were the same.
Werner,
My apologies. That has been fixed.
Tony
I agree with John, but than I like facts...
(cool article!)
Even if we assume that humans have altered the environment---of course we have; just look around---this is not the same thing as saying that government should or even could try to do something about it. It is on these philosophical questions where attention is focused. Not on the tripe that passes for science.
* I meant to say, "It is on these philosophical questions where attention _should be_ focused."
Even if we assume that humans have altered the environment---of course we have; just look around---this is not the same thing as saying that government should or even could try to do something about it. It is on these philosophical questions where attention is focused. Not on the tripe that passes for science.
Got something to say?
Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!