Skip to main content
Report this ad

Mickey Mouse Jesus gets art curators convicted of inciting religious hatred

jesusmickeymouse.jpg

Comments

  • Terry Hurlbut - Creationism Examiner 6 years ago

    I would have thought those artists would be accused of infringing upon Walt Disney's copyrights before anyone accused them of inciting religious hatred. One does not waste hate on a lame parody of a centuries-old interpretation of an event.

  • Gary - Newark Religion & Social Issues Examine 6 years ago

    Yet another example of danger of mixing church and state

  • Hugh Kramer 6 years ago

    "One does not waste hate on a lame parody of a centuries-old interpretation of an event."

    If that were true Terry, I wouldn't have had a story to report on.
    ;)

  • Qasim - Islam Examiner 6 years ago

    This is ridiculous. When will people learn that blasphemy is not a punishable offense? Blasphemy ridicules an idea. Ideas don't have rights, people have rights. As much as I have love for Jesus Christ, I cannot force others to have that same love for him. If people want to act in a blasphemous way, let them. Why extremists (Muslim and Christian alike, among others) are hell bent (no pun intended) on punishing people for blasphemy is beyond me.

    Just ignore such people. How hard is that? It's not like they're coming to your front door and shoving it in your face.

    If you truly believe in God as an all powerful being, then stop with this nonsense of trying to "protect God" and His Prophets (like Jesus). God's a big boy, rumor has it He can take care of Himself.

  • CortxVortx 6 years ago

    Christians in the USA are just jealous that there is no such law here (aren't you, Terry?).

  • Hugh Kramer 6 years ago

    "Blasphemy ridicules an idea. Ideas don't have rights, people have rights."

    Wow Qasim, and kudos to you! I never expected to hear an Enlightenment precept like that one promoted by anyone in the Islamic camp. Is that sentiment part of the Ahmadi creed or just your own?

  • Herne19d 6 years ago

    This is no different than the laws in place in Ireland or any number of countries. I am sure the religious right would love to enact laws of this nature here. And enforce such, no matter what.
    Another example of why church and state MUST remain separate.
    And before you get all upset (and you know who you are), that does not mean there cannot be any spiritualism in government. It means that there can be no favoritism shown to any particular belief path. So if a Baptist wants to give an opening prayer, that is fine. But an Atheist must be given an opportunity to say something as well. Not at the same time perhaps, but everyone should get a chance. And no one should be upset over this. But the religious people, those who can't figure out what it means to be spiritual or to follow the humanist path, will scream and gnash their teeth to the point of idiocy. This will make it a pain for those of us who are not sheeple and can think for our selves.....

  • P Smith 6 years ago

    Here is how all religions view the world:

    "When I am weaker, you must be merciful. When I am stronger, I must correct error."

    As per usual, now the Russian christian cult has attained sufficient power, it is becoming violent and intolerant of those who disagree with it. All cults seek power, and when they achieve it, they become violent.

    .

  • montreal women's issues, health and mental health 6 years ago

    I just don't think cartoons of religious figures are amusing.

  • Qasim - Islam Examiner 6 years ago

    @ Hugh - Thanks. This is what Islam teaches and is something ingrained in the Holy Qur'an, and yes, practiced by millions of Ahmadiyya Muslims worldwide.

    In fact, during the lifetime of the Promised Messiah (the founder of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community), Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, a book was being published disparaging and insulting the Prophet Muhammad. There was a huge hue and cry that this book should be banned and threats were made (mind you this is over 100 years ago).

    The response of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was that freedom of thought as championed by Islam dictates that this book should not be restricted. Rather, the only response should be of the pen, to write another book and demonstrate the logic and common sense the fallacies the disparaging book promotes.

    You can see our response to the Lahore attacks, the cartoon controversy, facebook etc as modern examples of what I've said above.

  • Qasim - Islam Examiner 6 years ago

    demonstrate *WITH* logic and common sense

  • Pauline 6 years ago

    What is Russia coming to? Religion is just one more aspect of society that is open to comment, opinion and parody.

  • P Smith 6 years ago

    Someone whined that "I just don't think cartoons of religious figures are amusing."

    Considering how laughable all religions are, that religion is a joke, using a cartoon is very á propos.

  • Jesse - Cochise County Libertarian Examiner 6 years ago

    Damn Mickey Mouse!

  • Pastafarian 6 years ago

    I want a Mickey Mouse Jesus!

    I don't care if it rains and freezes,
    Long as I got my Mickey Jesus,
    Ridin' on the dashboard of my car.......

  • crystal 6 years ago

    How stupid!

  • Nick 6 years ago

    Now I can't gey that song outta my head - "Hey Mickey you're so fine!"

    I must be a baaaad person...

  • David 5 years ago

    How can I move to Russia?

  • Davo 5 years ago

    The problem is that religous figures ARE cartoon characters.And the impotent apes that scratch about trying protect non-existant faires are pathetic.

  • Profile picture of David Cooper
    David Cooper 5 years ago

    Makes me grateful to live in a country in which free expression, including parody, is a constitutionally guaranteed right.

Report this ad