Skip to main content
Report this ad

See also:

Lisa Vanderpump & Brandi Glanville talk bankruptcy claims during 'RHOBH' reunion

Brandi Glanville arrives at Life & Style's Hollywood In Bright Pink Event Hosted By Giuliana Rancic at Bagatelle on October 9, 2013 in Los Angeles, California.
Photo by Valerie Macon/Getty Images

Lisa Vanderpump and Brandi Glanville have been going back and forth for months now with accusations against the other, and on the upcoming three-part "Real Housewives of Beverly Hills" reunion, things are no different.

In a March 12 report by Radar Online, it is reported that the pair will go head-to-head on the special about Brandi's claim that Lisa and her husband, Ken Todd, were once bankrupt and living in The Valley.

“Today on, you said that I use to live deep in the Valley and I filed for bankruptcy,” Lisa pointed out during the taping, at which point Brandi turned to Kyle Richards for answers.

“I never said they filed for bankruptcy,” Kyle told Brandi.

But Brandi continued on, informing Lisa that Kyle had told her that Lisa and Ken previously lived in Calabasas. However, Kyle claimed it was Ken who told her that.

“I never lived in Calabasas. Ken is from Calabasas. I moved from France to Beverly Park,” Lisa explained. And when Brandi revealed that she had looked it up online and discovered that Lisa did have a home with Ken in Calabasas, she revealed, “We’ve had many properties here that we’ve bought and sold. I didn’t live in Calabasas.”

Since Lisa and Ken were flipping houses, it makes sense that they would have been documented to have "lived" somewhere, even though they actually just had a project there. But who really cares about this issue anyway? Compared to the rest of the situation, this is an extremely minor detail.

Plus, what difference would it make if Lisa had lived in The Valley?

Report this ad