Is JD Hayworth corrupt or just a typical politician

He claims to be morally superior to McCain and claims to have a better voting record, however, as I have shown his voting record is nothing to be happy about. While some may claim he has made a miraculous about face from what he used to do and be, I say hogwash. Look at any modern politician and tell me the last time they told the truth or kept their word. The sad thing is that the majority of those supporting this washed up excuse for a politician are the same ones that gladly voted for McCain / Palin when they ran against Obama. Can you say ooops, since when has politics in this nation become only about the lesser of two evils? Why is it that people gladly ignore alternative possibilities based on what they term “inexperience” when in reality that is exactly what we need in office, we need someone who is fresh, new, and has NO bad voting record to overcome.

This is why I am supporting Jim Deakin for Arizona Senator in 2010. Until the primaries are, over I will continue supporting him and if the people of this state fail to wake up and realize the opportunity, we have in Deakin, the ability to have a true representative of the people in the United States Senate. If after the primaries occur and Deakin fails to make it, I will more than likely support another potential candidate who has proven to me that he cares about the people of this state.

Here are the brass tacks of the matter though, to elect JD Hayworth or John McCain is simply repeating the problems that are currently making this state a national laughing stock. Personally, I can hold my head high, and it is because I am not simply voting for the lesser of two evils or as some have told me, ensuring our “party” gets in. I mean do not forget, I am a Libertarian by nature, and freedom that is my goal! As for the title question, who cares after all in my book they are the same. Moreover, neither is good for this nation!

For more updates and great articles of this nature, feel free to subscribe