Skip to main content
  1. Life
  2. Society & Culture
  3. Generations

Is a low-carbon economy inevitable or impossible?

See also

Think global warming is a hoax? That America’s energy policy is in safe hands? Or that our children will never have to rely on alternative sources?

More Photos

Nobody knows for certain, but the Great Plains Institute (GPI) thinks biofuels are a good bet in any case. In his presentation “Toward a Low Carbon Energy System: Why the Transition Seems Both Impossible and Inevitable” at the St. Paul Student Center at the University of Minnesota on January 14, 2014, Institute Director Rolf Nordstrom acknowledged his own uncertainty regarding America’s transition to a low-carbon economy. Despite some pessimism “depending on what I read last,” he feels “optimistic down deep that we can change the system.”

Transitioning to alternative fuels does seem impossible. A “Rolling Stone” article identified a “cataclysmic disconnect” between our $27 trillion ownership of fossil fuels and their threat to the biosphere. Stock traders and utility shareholders suspect any development that threatens their investments. And no consensus exists on how to internalize the cost of transition while 80% of the world relies on fossil fuels for energy.

On the other hand, the demand for energy is flat or declining, cheap natural gas promises to close 1/3 of American coal plants, a fifth of our coal and nuclear plants need to be retired in the next 20 years due to inefficiency and safety concerns, and the younger generation seems less interested in car ownership.

So, what is the answer? There isn’t just one. Minnesota is the “Saudi Arabia of wind,” but wind occurs most often where the fewest people live. The same lack-of-infrastructure argument applies to solar energy, hydrogen and cellulosic ethanol which seem “always five years away.”

Critical factors are scope and diversity. Other fuel sources address America’s electrical needs, but not its transportation or heating requirements, nor the demand for new markets. Like oil and natural gas, biofuels can help meet our energy needs and supply the high-value chemicals that create rubber, plastics and other materials that found today’s lifestyle. Levulinic acid created from the Minnesota Arrowhead's “wood basket” could strengthen the state’s position in the fiercely competitive chemicals market and revitalize its declining forest industry.

Rather than a zero-sum game, GPI advocates expanding the definition and use of biofuel to meet Minnesota’s energy needs, “keep [its] overall infrastructure in place, and help energy producers “increase volume and build plants.” As Nordstrom says, “scarcity won’t drive change,” but by advocating biofuel as part of a “virtuous cycle of energy policy,” GPI can help Minnesota become a formidable player that conforms to the classical definition of a great society “where old men plant trees whose shade they shall never sit in.”

Advertisement

Life

  • ESPYS party
    Athletes and celebrities hit the red carpet at Body at the ESPYS party
    Today's Buzz
  • Healthy balance
    Keeping a healthy balance is so important for your own well-being
    Camera
    15 Photos
  • Apollo
    NASA observes 45th anniversary of Apollo 11: One giant leap for mankind
    Camera
    14 Photos
  • Unique jewelry
    Nothing catches the eye or completes and outfit like a great piece of jewelry
    Camera
    12 Photos
  • Student Farmworker Alliance
    Student-Farmworker Alliance launches 'Boot the Braids' web site
    Camera
    15 Photos
  • Exercise
    Find out why you should exercise to compliment your diet
    Camera
    10 Photos

Related Videos: