Skip to main content

See also:

Hillary smeared 12 year old rape victim to defend a dirtbag rapist?

Hillary's qualification to be president seriously diminished by reports of her unethical conduct in 1975 rape trial
Hillary's qualification to be president seriously diminished by reports of her unethical conduct in 1975 rape trialAndrew Burton/Getty Images

And the far left says Republicans are waging a “war on women?” If this doens't prove that Hillary Clinton is entirely unqualified to be president, after all the other issues we know about from her sordid past, who know what it will take to show that Hillary Clinton has no business running for president again. While defending a dirtbag rapist in a case she did not have to take, Hillary as a trial lawyer engaged in blatantly unethical and dishonest behavior while representing a dirtbag accused of raping a 12 year old girl.

In 1975, working as a trial lawyer, Hillary agreed to take the case representing Thomas Alfred Taylor, who was on trial for raping a 12 year old girl. This has become known because a recording of Hillary discussing the case was released and Hillary can be heard telling the story about the case, laughing while talking about defending the dirtbag rapist.

The New York Daily News reported, “I had him take a polygraph, which he passed, which forever destroyed my faith in polygraphs,” Clinton said, with a chuckle, when talking about Thomas Alfred Taylor, the man she represented as a 27-year-old lawyer.”

This is Hillary Clinton, the 2008 presidential candidate, former Senator form New York, and former First Lady who claims to have for years worked on behalf of children and women, laughing while telling a story about representing a dirtbag rapist accused of raping a 12 year old girl. Hillary also told how the defendant passed a polygraph test, and while believing he was guilty, lost faith in the accuracy of polygraph tests. So Hillary legally represented, in a criminal trial, a dirtbag that she believed was guilty of the crime of raping a 12 year old girl.

Bur her conduct in that case was even worse. Hillary smeared the victim of that case in order to try to win acquittal of the dirtbag rapist. So apparently desperate to win the case, Hillary engaged in some of the most dispicable and unethical conduct a lawyer could do, submitting an affadavit to the court that totally and dishonestly smeared the victim.

Fox News reported, “In an exclusive interview with The Daily Beast, the now 52-year-old woman, whose name was withheld by the publication out of concern for her privacy, said she still harbors anger toward Clinton. “Hillary Clinton took me through Hell,” the victim said.”

The victim was not aware that the Hillary Rodhman that defendant Taylor is the same Hillary that is now known as Hillary Clinton. Many years later the victim would learn that her rapist was defended by Hillary Clinton.

“The victim in the 1975 sexual abuse case that became Clinton’s first criminal defense said she wants to speak out after hearing Clinton talk about her case on newly discovered audio recordings from the 1980s, unearthed by the Washington Free Beacon and made public this week,” Fox News reported. The documents, including the signed statement smearing the victim that Hillary submitted to the court, are all available here.

In that statement, Hillary wrote about the 12 year old victim, “I have been informed that the complainant is emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men and engage in fantasizing. I have also been informed that she has in the past made false accusations about persons, claiming they had attacked her body. Also that she exhibits an unusual stubbornness and temper when she does not get her way.”

The victim denies accusing anyone else of rape and there was no evidence of any pattern of any past such accusations made by the defendant. It appears that Hillary just made this up in a desperate attempt to legally a defend her dirtbag rapist client. Conduct like this in a rape trial now would be unimaginable, but remember, this is Hillary Clinton, who claims to have been far more progressive than anyone else in defending and promoting the rights of children and women.

There are some on the progressive side who find Hillary's conduct in that trial outrageous as well. Writing under the name PocketNines, a blogger at The Daily Kos wrote, “It is really worth reading the whole well-sourced article, but here is the upshot: Two years into her career of making change and having Day One-readying experience, 27 year old Hillary Rodham was appointed a public defender in a rape case, and played out deep in the gray areas of morality by attacking the 12-year old victim's credibility. Though nobody involved in the case can recall a shred of evidence that the victim had any sort of history of making false claims, Hillary argued it as a centerpiece of her case anyway. And conveniently omitted this aspect of the case from her 2003 book, "Living History."

Daniel Greenfield, writing about the case for FrontPage Mag, wrote quite articulately about this, “You can’t lie about a 12-year-old rape victim because ‘that’s what lawyers do’. There are lawyers who do it. There are also soldiers who massacre civilians. There are doctors who involuntarily euthanize patients and cops who plant evidence at the scene of crimes...Hillary Clinton can’t hide behind being a lawyer...By smearing a 12-year-old rape victim with false accusations, Hillary Clinton was not being a good lawyer. A good lawyer doesn’t do everything possible to win. Just as a soldier or a police officer doesn’t do everything possible to win.”

There is no doubt that Hillary engaged in behavior that not only disqualified her from running for president, but that also should have had her disbarred for complete lack of ethics and honesty as a lawyer and she should have been getting a job bagging groceries at the Piggly Wiggly. This is not the behavior of someone who should have any authority over anyone else, let alone running the country.

Greenfield summed it up well, writing, “There are things that we don’t do to win. Those who don’t understand that aren’t good lawyers or good soldiers or good cops. They’re sociopaths.”

If the media reported the truth and voters understood the magnitude of the grossly unethical behavior by Hillary in the Taylor case, there were no longer be any serious talk about Hillary Clinton running for president in 2016. The revelation of this case is many years too late to get Hillary disbarred as a lawyer, but there's no statute of limitation on the voters becoming aware of what a dirtbag a presidential candidate truly is, and disqualifying them from running for president in the court of public opinion. And on this scandal alone, Hillary is revealed as being entirely unfit to serve as president.

We the People need to stand up...join us IMPEACH OBAMA NOW

Is this scandal the END of the Obama Regime?

The best place for us “right wing extremists” is the Conservative OPEN FORUM click the LIKE button and join the discussion!

No Phony Scandals here, join us for informative discussion about Obama Scandals.

Join us to defeat the extreme far left, please join our new Facebook group: STOP -- Stopping Tyrannical Oppressive Progressives.

Like Rush Limbaugh? Are you a student in the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies? Join Realville on Facebook!

If you like TED NUGENT for both his music and his political views, the group Hard Right Hard Rock is the group for you to join!

If you liked this article, please join Dean's facebook group to read more articles like it.

Stay on the right side of issues, visit my QstarNews Facebook page and like it and share it here

Outraged at how Barack Obama is destroying America? Join Us Here to oppose Obama!

Please also follow Dean on Twitter and Facebook.