
President Franklin Roosevelt tried to introduce
universal health care in 1934
Health care reform is on everyone’s mind. It’s an idea, they say, whose time has come. The cost of health insurance is out of control. 40 plus million Americans cannot afford or cannot qualify for health insurance.
But health care reform has been here before. Actually, about every 15 years there is a push for reforming health care in America. It started way back in 1912 when Theodore Roosevelt’s Bull Moose Party introduced a platform calling for national health insurance for industry.
In 1934 as part of the New Deal, Franklin Roosevelt considered proposing universal health coverage as part of the Social Security Act. Presidents as diverse as Truman, Carter, Ford, George H.W. Bush and Clinton have all introduced various proposals for health care reform. Universal health coverage is always the stated goal. All the proposals put forth by all these administrations, dating back to the early 1900's, have only thing in common—failure.
In 1943 President Truman proposed a single insurance plan that would cover all Americans. His plan allowed for public subsidies for the poor. This universal, comprehensive plan was to be run as part of Social Security. But Truman was faced with an economy that was transitioning from a war time economy to a peace time economy. For a time Truman lost the confidence of the general public. Republicans gained control of both houses of Congress in 1946 and branded Truman as a lame duck.
But Truman campaigned in 1948 on a promise to extend the New Deal and specifically targeted Congressional Republicans who had opposed national health insurance. Truman defeated these Republicans and seemed to have a mandate from the people to implement national health insurance. But despite having a Congress that had a Democratic majority, Truman could not pass his health reform plan. His plan failed because powerful Southern Democrats, all of whom held key leadship positions in Congress, feared that federal involvment in health care would lead to desegragation of hospitals that still separated patients by race.
Labor unions also played a part in the defeat of Truman's plan. The AFL-CIO supported the plan for universal coverage as did the UAW. But then, the UAW negotiated a deal with General Motors that included payment by GM of health insurance and pensions. Unions then believed that they could negotiate better benefits for their members than they could get under a federal universal health plan and they abandoned their support of universal care.
The AMA also opposed the Truman plan but they based their opposition on the unpopular concept of socialized medicine. As anti-communist sentiment rose, the public support for universal health care declined. Most large associations incuding the Chamber of Commerce, the ABA and the American Hospital Association supported the concept of voluntary and private health insurance. This was also the position favored by most of the nation's media.
Universal health insurance failed again in 1950. By that time the employer sponsored plans were deeply entrenched as an employee benefit. This was the time that insurance companies began to "experience rate" premiums. The result of this new rating system was that older, sicker people found it harder to get affordable coverage. In 1960 Congress passed the Kerr-Mills Act. This Act provided federal funds to the states to cover the health costs of the elderly who were too poor to afford health insurance. But this Act, with all its well meaning hope, failed completely because by 1963, only 28 states had agreed to participate and even those states did not budget correctly to support the plan. This Act, however, became the precursor to Medicare and Medicaid.
From 1970 through 1976 more competing plans were proposed But compromises came and went and no significant bill ever reached the House floor because of lack of Committee concensus. President Ford withdrew his attempt at universal health reform fearing that it would make inflation worse. President Carter campaigned on the promise of a comprehensive national health plan but once elected shifted his priorities to cost containment, specifically hospital cost control, and told the American people that national health insurance would have to wait intil the economy was stronger.
About that time, Senator Edward Kennedy introduced a new proposal which called for private health insurance companies to compete for customers. The private plans would sell an insurance card to be used for hospital and physician care. The cost of the card would depend on income and employers would be expected to cover the majority of the cost for their employees. The federal government would pick up the cost of the card for the poor. Neither the Carter nor the Kennedy proposal made it through the Congress.
The Clinton plan also supported universal health insurance through the enforcement of individual and employer mandates. The government would control the competition between private insurance companies The Health Care Task Force, chaired by Hillary Clinton when she was first lady, gave President Clinton a complex plan in September 1993. Despite a Democratic Congress, the size and complexity of the plan slowed its progress through Congress and lost the interest of the general population.
.jpg)
President Harry Truman proposed a single insurance system
Now in 2009, another administration is proposing health care reform. The White House has created the Office on Health Care Reform. Members of Congress are polishing up their own creations for solving this problem. The administration believes that popular opinion will compel our elected officials to end what might be considered a national embarrassment of having millions of American unable to afford or have access to quality health insurance. But as far back as the 1930’s, public support quickly began to fail as the insured were advised that the goal would only be achieved if they contributed more to the cost, either directly or through some added taxes.
The United States spends twice as much per capita as the average of the 10 next richest countries in the world. Yet, despite this expenditure, 1 out of 6 Americans under the age of 65 are uninsured and/or indivdually uninsurable.
One of the problems facing reform is that the 80% or so of American who have health insurance are generally happy with the care they receive. They like their doctors and the freedom to make their own choices when it comes to doctors and hospitals. Most think they already pay too much for health insurance. Most believe, and there is evidence to support this belief, that the red tape and the administrative expenses of their health insurance plan are part of the reason their cost has increased. Why can’t someone fix that, they wonder?

Senator Edward Kennedy (D-MA) affirmed his commitment to
health reform this year
The insured fear change. Any proposal that threatens their current insurance arrangement will be regarded with deep suspicion. They know that special interest groups are still very powerful. Our political system is set up in such a way as to frustrate action on any large and socially controversial idea. Congressional committees wield enormous power. The interests of each state differ and that fact alone can bring down the whole idea of reform.
We have had some success in improving access to health care for million through some of the Children’s Health Insurance Programs. But note that most of the programs to cover uninsured children are state based.
We seem to be unable to learn from past mistakes or take advantage of the concepts that actually have worked. Anyone who has done even a cursory study of history should realize that we have been here before.
Yes health reform is back again. What will happen this time? Stay tuned.













Comments
ALL HANDS ON DECK!
Howard Dean and the Democrats are correct.
"a" (Toothy, Robust, Affordable, Immediate, Triggerless, Medicare-Like ) "public health insurance option" (For All Who Want It) "is more important than bipartisanship, and Democrats should pass health-care legislation that includes the option with 51 votes if necessary."
"Democrats should have "no intention" of working with Republicans if it's not the strongest possible legislation that could be passed with a simple majority." (Howard Dean)
CONTACT CONGRESS and your representatives Now! And tell them you demand ALL of the minimum requirements above. This is the time for maximal, toothy, sustained pressure on Congress to get this done. Be creative. But be relentless.
This is what WE THE PEOPLE gave the Democrats all that power to do for ALL of us.
In medicine and healthcare there is only one acceptable standard. And that standard is the HIGHEST level of EXCELLENCE! you can provide for everyone. Nothing less
I'm uninsured. I don't want health insurance. Their solution to that "problem" is to force me to buy it. I don't earn money. I'm living off someone else's money, and at this age I need no health insurance.
There was never a problem in terms of people being uninsured, but the people making that claim didn't care. They knew that people just didn't want to buy insurance, and now we are going to have to pay a lot more than our risk is worth because of all the mandates, the ones on the individuals and the ones on the insurance companies themselves.
jacksmith:
You mean:
"In medicine and healthcare there is only one acceptable standard. And that standard is the HIGHEST level of EXCELLENCE! you can STEAL from everyone! Nothing less"
As a physician, I can assure you I won't be the only one who "goes Galt" should the government behemoth try to enslave me to provide medical care for "free".
Invest in funeral homes NOW. That will be the extension of government run health care... a higher death rate, ergo a need for quality, caring funeral homes.
Tell me where the HIGHEST level of EXCELLENCE exsists in the goverment. Where Jack? I'll tell you. NOWHERE JACK!! These are the same idiots that run Amtrack, the Post Office, Social Security, Medicare, need i go on. Please make a case of one item the goverment has taken on and done well with. Please say our failing schools Jack. Get a clue man, the less the goverment does the better off we all are.
I will agree with you on one thing Jack. You can provide for everyone, but excellent it will not be. Sorry Jack.
Got something to say?
Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!