We think you're near Los Angeles

GPS watch for marathon training: Timex Ironman Global Trainer vs. Garmin 405

If you're slightly obsessive-compulsive when it comes tracking the details of your workouts during marathon training (like me),  you've probably considered getting a GPS sports watch.

I was a little late to switch over to GPS technology, and used a Polar RS800 with a foot pod for the last couple of years.   I loved the watch, but the software was overly complicated and clunky.  It also wasn't compatible with my Mac, and required me to use Parallels every time I wanted to download data or analyze my workouts.

Check here for the review of the new Timex Ironman Run Trainer.

In September I purchased the Garmin Forerunner 405 and I've been running with it for the last couple of months.  A few weeks ago, Sports Authority sent me its main competitor, the Timex Ironman Global Trainer, for review. 

Advertisement

The first thing you'll notice when you look at the Timex Ironman Global Trainer is the size.  Yes, it's large, especially for a woman with a small wrist.   I certainly wouldn't wear it with a cocktail dress.  But with its size comes a huge advantage:  It's easy to see and read while on the run.

The face is large enough to show four fields at once (the Garmin only shows three).   And because the face is so big, I have no problem quickly glancing down to see the four fields I like to monitor on the run:  My heart rate, my distance, my pace and my time.  

Like the Garmin, the Timex can also be customized to show other fields (altitude, calories, heart rate zones, etc.).

Before you can use the Timex, you have to do an initial setup, entering in the time of day and personal settings.  The basic setup on the Timex is intuitive, and could likely be done without the manual. 

This isn't the case with the Garmin 405, which requires memorizing when to use the bezel versus the buttons, and when to tap, hold, touch or double touch.  I still don't have it down.

The seven buttons that you need to use on the Timex are clearly labeled, so you always know what button to touch when.  Like other Timex Ironman watches, the Start/Split button is located separately at the bottom of the face, to avoid confusion when marking splits while racing.

The heart rate monitor strap that comes with the Timex is the best I've ever used in terms of fit and comfort.  It's soft, like the strap that comes with the newer Polar watches, and can easily be sized to fit even the smallest chests (yes, I just admitted it).

The Garmin chest strap has more than 12 inches of hard plastic on the front, and is both uncomfortable and more likely to cause chafing.  It's also too large for people with small chests.

When it comes to locking onto the satellites, however, the Garmin 405 is significantly faster.  My Garmin can usually find the satellites in five to 30 seconds.  The Timex can take up to two minutes, not fun when you're standing out in the cold waiting to run.

The Garmin will automatically load your workouts onto your Mac or PC (as long as the ANT+ is plugged into the computer) any time you bring the watch within three meters of your computer. 

With the Timex, you have to plug the watch into the computer, make sure the Timex Device Agent application is open and choose to upload the workouts. 

The Garmin Connect software is slightly more intuitive than the TrainingPeaks software available for the Timex.   Both Garmin Connect and TrainingPeaks provide you with enough training details to analyze every single aspect of each run.  The TrainingPeak software has the added benefit of being able to track your diet.

There is foot pod available for the Garmin, perfect if you do a lot of your runs on the treadmill or in areas with poor satellite reception.  As of yet, there's no foot pod available for the Timex Ironman Global Trainer, so treadmill workouts will have to be added to your training log manually.

I found both the Garmin and the Timex to be relatively accurate for measuring distance, speed, altitude and calories.  Neither were 100 percent, but they were certainly more accurate than my Polar speed/distance monitor with no GPS.

The Garmin Forerunner 405 and the Timex Ironman Global Trainer both shine in different areas.  If you're choosing between the two, you'll have to decide which features are most important to you. 

The Timex is much easier to see on the run, is simpler to use and has a superior heart rate monitor strap. 

The Garmin locks onto the satellites faster, offers quick wireless uploads and has slightly better software for analyzing your runs.

The Timex Ironman Global Trainer is available at Sports Authority right now at an online exclusive price of $239.99. 

From now until December 19, 2010, there is also a $50.00 manufacturer's rebate on the Timex.

The Garmin Forerunner 405 with heart rate monitor is available at Sports Authority for $349.99. 

, Running Examiner

Kimberly Bontempo Bogin is a three-time Emmy Award winning television producer and writer. She's an avid marathoner and trail runner, and an independent wear tester for a major running shoe company. Kimberly has participated in races all over the country, including the Boston Marathon, the ING...

Comments

  • Ron Presley 1 year ago

    The new electronics just amaze me.

  • Jim Morris 1 year ago

    very interesting

  • Profile picture of Natalie DiTullio
    Natalie DiTullio 1 year ago

    which one would you choose if you were buying one? Great review, I am trying to decide what to get for christmas!

  • Profile picture of Erin Sanders
    Erin Sanders 1 year ago

    Yes, I want the Garmin for X-mas. C;mon Santa!

  • Tamirim 1 year ago

    Thanks for the comparison. I am thinking about getting a GPS monitor myself, so this is very useful. I think I would like to go for Garmin (mainly because of the foot pod), but I would like to have bigger face on the watch. I am leaning towards going for Garmin 305XT. I have seen a good review about it here: http://www.heart-rate-monitor-watches.com/garmin-forerunner-310xt-gps-he...

    If you have used it, I would love to know how it compares with the 405 model.

  • Profile picture of Kimberly Bogin
    Kimberly Bogin 1 year ago

    I wish I could help you. I haven't run with the 305, but I've read good things about it, and I believe it has a larger face.

  • Profile picture of tamirim
    tamirim 1 year ago

    Thanks for your reply. Yes, the 305 and also 310XT have a larger face, so I am probably going to get one of them.

  • Ernest 1 year ago

    I already have the Garmin 310XT but I'm considering to switch to Timex for a simple reason ...

    ... on a multisport mode (great for Triathlon) the Garmin only shows Time & distance, whereas Timex let's you change the specs for each discipline... ie. time & pace for the run, distance & time for the cycle and total time for the swim...

    The garmin watch only lets you pick up what you want on your screen off-multisport mode only!!! really annoying when you wanna track your pace on your run and cycle!! very stupid.

    If Garmin doesn't wake up, they will loose a lot of Triathletes like me as this is FUNDAMENTAL for our races!

  • Profile picture of Kimberly Bogin
    Kimberly Bogin 1 year ago

    Good point about using the Timex for triathlons. I only tested it for running, but you're quite right, it does let you change the specs for each distance. It's also more water resistant than the Garmin.

  • Ernest 1 year ago

    By the way, my daughter is also called Erin.... what a lovely name!!! :-)

Add a new comment

Join the conversation! Log in here or create a new account if you've never registered before.

Got something to say?

Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!

Don't miss...