For many years now, any time any location in the world experienced more than a few days of above 90F weather, the Meteorologists would ring their hands in worry. "Further proof of Global Warming?", they would eventually posit. And the Main Stream Media would dutifully chant the global warming propaganda.
Yet, this writer has been often perplexed when the Meteorologists and Main Stream Media don't report that perhaps Global Warming isn't occurring when we experience colder weather below normal.
Lets think about that for a moment. For only 4 months of the past year, were temperatures in the Minnesota Twin Cities region above 80F. The 2013 Spring in Minnesota was very late. The 2013-2014 winter was particularly harsh. And the 2014 Spring is running about 5-7 weeks late when we divine the blossoming of the dandelion and the build up of the greatly reduced honeybee population.
Yet, to the best of his knowledge, again no Main Stream Media has ran a story indicating that this recent bout of colder than usual weather tends to disprove the existence of Global Warming.
Regular readers recall this writer has written previously about the Global Warming aka Climate Change hoax. The latest iteration of this writer's article follows here:
And, therefore, to avoid appearing hypocritical, this writer has written this article and proclaims that this near 8 month absence of of temperatures about 80F in the Minnesota Twin Cities area further disproves the bogus Global Warming Scam.
But this writer would suggest to you that this one sided Global Warming Mantra of US Main Stream Media is something more sinister, rather than something simply quizzical.
GLOBAL WARMING AS CASE STUDY IN THE ESTABLISHMENT OF TRUTH IN THE US
This writer asserts to you that this repetition of facts only favorable to the theory of Global Warming is a psychological tactic. The psychological tactic being to give you only information that supports the "truth" your government wants you to arrive at.
Those of you who have read some of my earlier articles regarding Natural Law, Divine Right of Kings, Marxism and Progressivism know something of how Truth is established in pursuant to these various metaphysical/Government models.
Under the Governance Doctrine of the Divine Right of Kings, Truth was established by the King and the Church. These two institutions merely said, this is the truth, and a combination of their overwhelming power and/or consequences for uttering a truth contradictory to their official truth, mandated it was the accepted truth. Examples of these would be "The world is flat" and "The earth is the center of the universe". While many were exiled or burned at the stake for heresy, the prominence of Galileo being placed under house arrest for nearly 20 years near the end of his life, stands out as a most obvious example "Truth enforcement".
Natural Law and its related Governance Doctrine of "Consent of the Governed" were the forceful successors to the Divine Right of Kings. Natural Law and Consent of the Governed were reduced to writing during The Enlightenment 1650AD-1800AD. Natural Law and Consent of the Governed provide that the individual should establish truth for themselves using their own observations and reasoning.
- Natural Law: How WE THE PEOPLE got to the 4th of July, 1776 1/2
- Natural Law: How WE THE PEOPLE got to the 4th of July, 1776 2/2
Progressivism, established circa 1900AD, provides that truth is established by Educated Elites because they have studied governance. Further, Progressivism provides that Educated Elites be selected from about the wealthy, leisure class because only they have the time and resources to study governance, and therefore determine the best interests of society.
This writer discusses the various transitions of who establishes Truth in these various Governance Systems in the following article:
But, the short version is as follows. The "Powers that be" that existed under the Governance Doctrine of Divine Right of Kings enjoyed great power and income in being able to establish Truth for the masses. These "Powers that be" did not anticipate the changes The Enlightenment would bring. The masses, now establishing truth for themselves, came to question by what authority the King was the King and could not be questioned. These same masses, having established truth for themselves, demanded reform. And Kings and Countries either accepted reform or were swept away in violent revolutions such as occurred in France and the American Colonies.
But the "Powers that be" did not give up on their endeavors to restore their previous power, income and ability to establish truth. In the Mid 1800's, the "Powers that be" floated one attempt to regain their former power in the guise of Marxism. Freedom loving Americans would not by into Marxism, so circa 1900AD Marxism 2.0 renamed Progressivism was introduced into America.
And within the province of Progressivism, the "Powers that be" determined they could not reestablish their own previous authority to establish truth for the masses as they did under the Divine Right of Kings. Their Plan B was to manipulate the American masses to the truth the "Powers that be" desired.
Instead of telling the American masses what to believe, the "Powers that be" would provide the masses only with the information that would lead the masses to reach the same truth the "Powers that be" wanted them to have. The beauty of this is that the masses are deceived into thinking they have exercised free will in establishing truth for themselves using their own observations and reasoning.
The "Powers that be" adapted to the American Individual's insistence in establishing truth for themselves. The "Powers that be" did this by controlling the information the individual observed such that the individual established for themselves the truth that "Powers that be" wanted them to have. In so doing, the "Powers that be" essentially reinstated their position of establishing Truth for the masses. However, with the added benefit that the majority of the masses wrongly believed they had established the truth for themselves of their own free will.
With the Foundation of the previous history and facts of the Establishment of Truth in Society, concluding our Case Study of Global Warm is a simple task.
Main Stream Media is only providing information that will lead the masses to believe that Global Warming aka Climate Change is occurring as that is the truth that the "Powers that be" want to establish. Once you know the history and psychology of who establishes Truth in various metaphysical systems, societies and governments, understanding why Main Stream Media is not reporting the information that refutes Global Warming is clear. The "Powers that be" are unable to restore their previous ability of just simply mandating the established Truth and, therefore, have resorted to restricting the masses to only hearing information which will lead them to reaching the Truth the "Powers that be" desire.
This writers previous article:
represents another great case study of how our government and Main Stream Media restricted the masses access information such that the observations and reasoning of the masses would lead them to establish the Truth that the "Powers that be" wanted. A Truth that the "Powers that be" would have otherwise simply mandated, if they could restore their power to do so.
Further, Global Warming and Obamacare are not the only two issues where this "control of information to the masses is used to cause the masses to establish the truth for themselves which is the same truth that the "Powers that be" would have previously simply mandated" is exercised. Being thus informed of this psychological tactic being inflicted upon you, you will begin to notice the use of censorship, propaganda and selective reporting of information to manipulate you to "establish the truth" that the "powers that be" want you to have.
And if you want to further ponder the disinformation being distributed to the masses, please read this article:
At this point, this writer asks you to consider the Computer Programming adage, "Garbage in, garbage out" and apply it to the human experience.
Please wake up America! You are being managed and manipulated like livestock instead of being represented by your elected officials. (Please read the link on Critical Thinking in the list of sources at the end of this article.)
Agenda 21 is not about the Environment, it is about control.
Obamacare is not about Healthcare, it is about control.
Gun Control is not about Guns, it is about control.
I believe there are more instances of the abridgement of freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments by those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations.
Those were my thoughts.
Thank you, my fellow citizens, for taking your valuable time to read and reflect upon what is written here.
If what is written here rings true to you, perhaps you should contact your local elected officials and let them know. If you are afraid of repercussions, snail mail it anonymously and ask them to respond in the local paper or their own monthly/quarterly internet newsletter. Even if this article refers to something outside you geographic area, it still likely applies to your location. Remember all those taxpayer training junkets we taxpayers send the bureaucrats on? They all learn the same “livestock management” techniques to use on WE THE PEOPLE.
And that leaves WE THE PEOPLE with this conundrum: While our #Government works full time with compensation and funded with our money for the cause of #Tyranny; WE THE PEOPLE are forced to work part time without compensation for the cause of #liberty with what is left over of our time, money and energy.
Finally, this article is written with the same intentions as Thomas Paine http://ushistory.org/paine. I seek no leadership role. I seek only to help the American People find their own way using their own “Common Sense” http://amzn.to/kbRuar
Keep Fighting the Good Fight!
Bring Home the Politicians #BHTP
Lawless America #LawlessAmerica
Term Limits #TermLimit
Justice in Minnesota #JIM
Critical Thinking Notice - This author advises you as no politician would dare. Exercise Critical Thinking (http://bit.ly/ubI6ve) in determining the truthfulness of anything you read or hear. Do not passively accept nor believe anything anyone tells you, including this author... unless and until you verify it yourself with sources you trust and could actively defend your perspective to anyone who might debate you to the contrary of your perspective.