Skip to main content
  1. News
  2. Politics
  3. Republican

Fox News' Brit Hume spotlights article on 'after-birth abortion'

See also

On Sunday, Fox News' Brit Hume discovered there are some who believe abortion is something that should be allowed after a child is born, Twitchy reported.

"There are now people seriously arguing for abortion AFTER BIRTH," he tweeted, citing a 2012 article at Slate.

According to Slate, two philosophers, Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva, coined the term "after-birth abortion," and argued for it in the Journal of Medical Ethics.

"[W]hen circumstances occur after birth such that they would have justified abortion, what we call after-birth abortion should be permissible," they wrote, suggesting the term "after-birth abortion" be used instead of "infanticide" to "emphasize that the moral status of the individual killed is comparable with that of a fetus … rather than to that of a child."

"Therefore, we claim that killing a newborn could be ethically permissible in all the circumstances where abortion would be. Such circumstances include cases where the newborn has the potential to have an (at least) acceptable life, but the well-being of the family is at risk," they added.

A number of people found the idea disgusting and sick.

"Obvious next step. If you don’t really believe it’s a life in utero, what’s another 5-10 minutes?" tweeted The Blaze's Becket Adams.

The two philosophers, however, seemed to go far beyond just the first 5-10 minutes of life:

If criteria such as the costs (social, psychological, economic) for the potential parents are good enough reasons for having an abortion even when the fetus is healthy, if the moral status of the newborn is the same as that of the infant and if neither has any moral value by virtue of being a potential person, then the same reasons which justify abortion should also justify the killing of the potential person when it is at the stage of a newborn.

"[S]o, 5yrs later, you murder your kid & your defense is, 'I was going to have an abortion,'" one person said in response.

In essence, that is exactly what the two philosophers argued, and it's not the only time such an argument has been made.

We reported last March that Alisa LaPolt Snow, a lobbyist representing the Florida Alliance of Planned Parenthood Affiliates, argued for a right to post-birth abortion in Florida during a hearing on the "Infants born alive" bill introduced in the legislature.

The bill passed the committee with a 10-2 vote.

Related:

----------------------------------------------------------------

If you like this article, you can follow Joe on Twitter @jnewby1956, visit and like his Facebook page, or subscribe to receive email updates when a new article is published.

For hard-hitting conservative commentary, please visit Joe's blog, the Conservative Firing Line. You can also find Joe's articles at Right News Now, Liberty Unyielding and PolitiCollision.

Advertisement

News

  • Mt. Everest avalanche
    Disaster strikes Mt. Everest as at least 12 people were killed in an avalanche
    Video
    Watch Video
  • Most Earthlike planet discovered
    The Kepler telescope has discovered the most Earthlike, possibly habitable planet yet
    Space News
  • Easter crosses create debate
    Easter crosses spark a debate of separation of church and state in Ohio
    Headlines
  • Chelsea Clinton is preggers
    Former first daughter Chelsea Clinton is pregnant with her first child
    Headlines
  • Stanley Cup playoffs
    The battle for Lord Stanley's Cup is on, don't miss a minute of playoff action
    Sports
  • Ukraine discussed amongst U.S., E.U., Russia
    The U.S., E.U. and Russia agree on ways to diffuse the tension in Ukraine
    Video
    Watch Video

User login

Log in
Sign in with your email and password. Or reset your password.
Write for us
Interested in becoming an Examiner and sharing your experience and passion? We're always looking for quality writers. Find out more about Examiner.com and apply today!