Have you looked at imaged scans of your brain on the most addictive foods? Check out the article, TLC Cooking "Top 5 Most Addictive Foods." What counts are the latest validated scientific studies. And the food industry seems to be battling the studies insisting on more validation and credibility.
So when will the proof be credible enough to satisfy the average shopper's choices as to what foods are affordable and easily accessible? Are the most addictive foods still sugar, chocolate, cheese/dairy, and meats say compared to fruit without sugar, coconuts, bananas, bland, bitter, or cruciferous vegetables, and seafood?
In the Sacramento area, UC Davis studies food addiction. See, UC Davis Graduate Studies: Food Science. In fact UC Davis also studies foods that can help you stop smoking. Some of those anti-smoking foods include spices such as cinnamon and herbs such as ginger and garlic. There's also apples.
In the Sacramento and Davis regional areas, UC Davis studies apples. And apples are one of the foods recommended to help you stop smoking. It's not only apples but spices such as cinnamon as well as herbs such as garlic and ginger that also are anti-smoking foods. See the articles, UC-Davis Reports New Apple Heart Health Benefits and Health Benefits of Apples.
Then why do some foods change the chemistry of your brain to make it react more like a drug addict after you eat those foods, mainly sugar, processed foods, and starches as well as "fatty foods." On the other hand some doctors say eating certain types of fatty foods are good for you, provided that the fats are 'healthy' fats such as coconut with its medium-chain fatty acids and nuts and seeds with their various omega 3 fatty acids. See the uTube video, Dr. Fuhrman - Value of High Fat Foods - YouTube. Also healthy foods include certain raw plant foods. See the video, Dr. Joel Fuhrman on Raw Food Challenges #661 - YouTube.
Changes in the brain caused by soda, fatty foods, processed foods, and sugar
What changes in your brain may be caused by soda, fatty foods, processed foods, and sugar? You can check out the Bloomberg News article by Robert Langreth and Duane D. Stanford, which appeared today in the November 6, Sacramento Bee, "Soda, fatty foods may spur addiction." In that article, studies are reported that show changes in the human brain. But sometimes the average consumer may not know which foods are addictive and which foods are healthier for the individual.
Cupcakes may be addictive just like cocaine, according to the article, "Soda, fatty foods may spur addiction." Basically the medical studies at leading universities mentioned in the article show that processed foods and sugary drinks hijack the brain "in ways that resemble addictions to cocaine, nicotine, and other drugs."
You have to examine the data, which the article reports is overwhelming. And the point of the article explains that scientists are finding evidence of overlap between drugs in the brain and food. Why does food, well, certain types of food, hit the brain like a bomb or rather like a drug and change the brain in much the same way as addiction to drugs change the brain?
Food is medicine, say some scientists. And other researchers say food is addictive. The Lab tests so far have found that sugary drinks and fatty foods may produce addictive behavior in animals. Then human brain scans were done by the scientists. But the scans looked compulsive eaters and obese participants.
What the scientists found were disturbances in brain-reward circuits similar to those experienced by drug addicts or drug abusers. In 2011, there are already 28 published studies on food addiction. You can look up these articles in the National Library of Medicine database. See the site, National Library of Medicine - National Institutes of Health.
You have on one hand scientists looking at processed, commercial foods that they are calling addictive. But will industry put it's foot in the door so to speak when the food and beverage businesses generate one trillion dollars, according to the article? The news article doesn't state whether the one trillion dollar food industry figure is annual or not.
What both the scientists and the industry are watching for is any real proof that fatty foods and snacks sweetened with sugar or corn syrup are addictive. So far, there's no proof in writing with a definitive statement saying certain foods are addictive drugs or behave like addictive drugs in the human brain. On the other hand, for shoppers, the consumer battle depends on what scientists can find that can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
Now it's a legal problem. You can check out the website of Yale University's Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity. See, Rudd Center for Food Policy & Obesity — Home. The site contains numerous articles. See, On Preventing Nutrition Negligence. There also are the results of seminars you can peruse. See, Excess Intake and Taxes on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages: Potential Implications on Healthcare Costs and Selling Public Health Policy in Derivative Markets: Lessons from the 2009-2010 New York State Sugary Beverage Excise Tax Campaigns.
For example in the 2011 newsletter of the Rudd Center, you can read a brief article about why the Rudd Center objects to recent criticism of New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, whose suitability as a potential presidential candidate has been challenged because of his body weight.
Another focus is the language that health care providers use when discussing a child's weight with parents can reinforce weight-based stigma and jeopardize discussions about health, according to a study recently published by the Rudd Center. The study appeared in the journal Pediatrics.
President Obama Urged to Protect Children from Junk-Food Marketing
Food advocates across the country are asking the President to act now to protect children from junk-food marketing. The country’s leading researchers and advocates for healthy eating, coordinated by the Prevention Institute, unveiled “We’re Not Buying It,” a video highlighting deceptive marketing to children and launched a campaign urging the President to stand up for children’s health, according to an article posted at the Rudd Center.
The Interagency Working Group on Food Marketed to Children (IWG) proposed reasonable, science-based nutrition guidelines to help provide a model for companies that market to kids. However, the food industry and media companies are working to get Congress and the Administration to stop the IWG from finalizing these sensible recommendations.
The campaign calls on the President to join parents, doctors, and public health practitioners in standing up for children’s health by supporting the voluntary guidelines, according to the Rudd Center's October 2011 newsletter. Check out the many nutrition-related articles and reports in their current and archived newsletters. Also see the site, EWG Takes a Stand on Food Marketed for Children.
National Children's Nutrition Examiner
National One-Pot-Meals Examiner
Sacramento Healthy Trends Examiner
Sacramento Women's Issues Examiner
Sacramento Media & Culture Examiner
Sacramento Holistic Family Health Examiner
Follow Anne Hart's various Examiner articles on nutrition, health, and culture on this Facebook site and/or this Twitter site. Also see some of Anne Hart's 91 paperback books at: iUniverse, and Career Press. Or see author's website.















Comments