Skip to main content

See also:

Farmers are retiring with not enough young replacements

If you've looked at the young people tending to their animals at the State Fair in the past few days, have you wondered whose going to train young farmers to replace the retiring farmers if there's not enough money to train them? If you're a Sacramento woman or man interested in being trained as a farmer or rancher to replace retiring farmers in the local area, there's a new way you can be trained. You may wish to check out the article, "You did it! Farmer training + land access win in Farm Bill." Finally in 2014, the bill passed. Whew!

Future farmers and retiring farmers.
Photo by Sean Gallup/Getty Images

It took a long time to finally pass in 2014. Too long. But here are a few changes fought for and won:

Valuable training programs, such as those offered by the Farm Beginnings Collaborative, will continue to be available for farmers nationwide. The Beginning Farmer and Rancher Development Program, a grant program that supports hundreds of training programs for new and beginning farmers across the country, was fully funded.

The microloan program is here to stay. The Farm Service Agency’s microlending program, which NYFC worked to pass and which distributed loans to more than 3,000 farmers across the country in its first year, was made permanent.
For new farmers, working with the Farm Service Agency to buy a farm will now be easier. The experience requirement for farm ownership loans, which was formerly a 3-year minimum, was made more flexible for applicants with non-traditional training experiences.

The first steps were taken towards protecting the affordability of farmland for farmers. The definition of the Agricultural Conservation Easement Program was expanded to include farm “viability,” which will help us ensure that federal support for farmland conservation easements will focus on protecting the affordability of farms.

Farmers receiving subsidies will be required to take care of their land. The new crop insurance provisions require conservation compliance, which will help to ensure that farmland is not abused and topsoil will be preserved for future generations.

Protections for livestock farmers were kept intact. The final bill rejects a series of extreme proposals to eliminate market and contract protections for livestock and poultry farmers, safeguarding a fair and competitive market. And that's how it went as Sacramentans followed the bill for several years, hoping each year that it would pass.

How did the Beginning Farmer and Rancher Act of 2011 or of 2013 and finally passing in 2014 affect Sacramento area farmers or people who want to become farmers but don't as yet know who to contact?

You also may wish to check out the July 20, 2014 Sacramento Bee article, "Dan Walters: State Fair shows California’s youthful talent, but for how long? Also, you don't have to be a veteran, but there also are opportunities for veterans to become beginning farmers and finding training or apprenticeships with retiring and other farmers. Of course the same opportunity also is open to males. Or you can see the website of the Beginning Farmer and Rancher Opportunity Act of 2013. What's going to happen in the next few years?

Bill Basics

The Beginning Farmer and Rancher Opportunity Act of 2013 was supposed to invest in the next generation of American producers, but what really happened? The Act of 2013 was supposed to give young farmers the chance to be trained and get experience by:

  • Enabling access to land, credit and technical assistance for new producers.
  • Assisting new producers to launch and strengthen new farm and value-added businesses.
  • Helping new producers become good land stewards.
  • Providing training, mentoring, and research that beginning farmers and ranchers need to be successful.
  • Conducting outreach on agricultural job opportunities for military veterans.

Why It Matters

  • The future of family farming and ranching in America – and the viability of our nation’s food supply – depends upon removing existing obstacles to entry into farming so that more people can start to farm.
  • This bill encompasses a national strategy for addressing those barriers, focusing on the issues that consistently rank as the greatest challenges for beginning producers.
  • This bill makes an important investment in the next generation of farmers and ranchers at a cost of just a fraction of one percent of the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s budget.

The Act is a bipartisan and bicameral bill that was introduced in both the House and Senate back in April 2013. Several of the bill’s provisions were included in either or both the Senate-passed or House-passed Farm Bills, and NSAC. Those supporting opportunities for new farmers advocated that these provisions remain intact if and when Congress moves to conference and pass a final farm bill. But where's the money or the interest in helping young people make a living in farming if they're starting from scratch with no money, relatives in the business, or land to farm.

The Beginning and Farmer Rancher Opportunity Act is a result of strategic collaboration among many individuals and farmer advocacy organizations, including the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition and many NSAC member groups, including Land Stewardship Project, Center for Rural Affairs, National Young Farmers’ Coalition, California FarmLink, and Michigan Organic Food and Farm Alliance, among others, says its website, Beginning Farmer and Rancher Opportunity Act | National .

Maybe you want to raise organic produce, organic chickens, or have a horse ranch or any other type of farm or ranch. How can you prepare to replace all those retiring farmers? You can apply for local training with an apprenticeship

What if you're a female veteran, what opportunities will be open to you if you'd like to become a new, beginning farmer? You could start by looking back to what happened in 2011 and 2013. Check out the websites, Beginning Farmer and Rancher Opportunity Act an Important Step and Beginning Farmer and Rancher Opportunity act. Back in 2011, ten Senators introduced the Beginning Farmer and Rancher Opportunity Act of 2011, a comprehensive bill that highlights federal programs supporting economic opportunities for young and beginning farmers and ranchers, according to a November 10, 2011 news release, "Senate Champions Introduce Beginning Farmer Bill – NSAC.

The bill addressed many of the barriers that new agriculture entrepreneurs face such as limited access to land and markets, hyper land price inflation, high input costs, and a lack of sufficient support networks. As older farmers in Sacramento retire, and new trainee farmers and ranchers are needed to take the retiring farmers' places and run local Sacramento, Davis, and Central California Valley farms and ranches. That's where the Beginning Farmer Rancher Opportunity Act steps in to bring in new farmers to California.

The Beginning Farmer Rancher Opportunity Act was introduced back in 2011 by Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA), along with nine original co-sponsors, including Sens. Robert Casey (D-PA), Jon Tester (D-MT), Sherrod Brown (D-OH), Patrick Leahy (D-VT), Al Franken (D-MN), Jeff Bingaman (D-NM), Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Tim Johnson (D-SD), and Barbara Boxer (D-CA).

Whose going to replace retiring farmers if there's not enough money to train new farmers?

An identical companion bill (H.R.3236) was introduced in the House by Representatives Tim Walz (D-MN-1) and Jeff Fortenbery (R-NE-1) in October. Additional members of Congress have signed on in support of the bill, including Reps. Leonard Boswell (D-IA-3), Chellie Pingree (D-ME-1), Gerald Connolly (D-VA-11), Sam Farr (D-CA-17), Earl Blumenhauer (D-OR-3), Betty McCollum (D-MN-4), Mike McIntyre (D-NC-7), and David Loebsack (D-IA-2). There are additional members of both houses and parties that have indicated their support for the bill and will likely be signing on as co-sponsors.

"We applaud Senators Harkin and his colleagues for introducing this legislation which is so important to the future of farming in this country," said Juli Obudzinski, a policy specialist with the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition, according to the press release. "The bill pulls together the best ideas from around the country for advancing new farming opportunities by building on the progress of previous farm bills, and stepping up the pace of reform."

In his introductory remarks, Senator Harkin noted in the news release, "One of the most hopeful occurrences in rural America is when someone is able to get started in farming or ranching and go on to build a successful operation. We need more beginning farmers and ranchers in America to secure critical supplies of food, fuel, and fiber for the future; to care for and conserve our soil, water, and other natural resources; and to join in the life of healthy and vibrant local communities.”

The bill builds upon a strategic collaboration among many farmer advocacy organizations, including the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition and many NSAC member groups, including Land Stewardship Project, Center for Rural Affairs, National Young Farmers’ Coalition, California FarmLink, and Michigan Organic Food and Farm Alliance, among others.

Since 2009, NSAC and its allies have met with numerous officials at various USDA agencies, many legislative offices both in-district and on Capitol Hill, and with other farm and membership groups to solicit input on the bill’s provisions in order to make them as strong and targeted as possible

The bill includes provisions that cut across six titles of the Farm Bill, including proposals that address conservation program set asides and incentives, access to credit, rural development, research and extension, and access to crop insurance and other risk management tools. These proposals aim to address many of the barriers that new farmers face, and will create real economic opportunities for the next generation of farmers.

"With the new Farm Bill, Congress has a great opportunity to enact a comprehensive beginning farmer and rancher initiative that breaks down barriers to entry and gives real support to ensure the effective start-up and success of new small and mid-scale producers across the country," said Obudzinski, according to the press release. "This bill establishes a beginning farmer federal policy platform we believe will garner wide support both on Capitol Hill and at the grassroots level."

The National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition is a grassroots alliance that advocates for federal policy reform supporting the long-term social, economic, and environmental sustainability of agriculture, natural resources, and rural communities. For more information on the Beginning Farmer and Rancher Act of 2011, visit NSAC’s website. Or see the 2013 version, Beginning Farmer and Rancher Opportunity Act | National. So, now in 2014, where are all the opportunities or the funds to train young farmers to replace those who are retiring?

Farmers markets inspire WIC moms, but grocery-store produce costs less, says new research

If you think you're getting a bargain at a farmers market, you may be paying more for the same product you can get in a supermarket or other food market, and a lot of farmers markets aren't selling organic food or some of the vendors can't afford to become certified organic. Since the average age of farmers in the USA is around 59, there needs to be more young farmers. Female farmers are increasing in numbers. But at the same time, classes in schools that prepare young people to become farmers are short of money. You also may wish to read the PDF article, "An Agricultural Law Research Article Who Will Teach Our Farmers?"

The University of Illinois' Karen Chapman-Novakofski and Ashley L. Wheeler co-authored "Farmers' Markets: Costs Compared With Supermarkets, Use Among WIC Clients, and Relationshp to Fruit and Vegetable Intake and Related Psychosocial Variables," published in the May 2014 issue of the Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior.

When participants in a local Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) program received vouchers for fruits and vegetables at area farmers markets, they ate a greater variety of vegetables and more often chose fruits or vegetables as snacks. But a survey comparing prices at grocery stores and farmers markets showed that better produce prices could be found in local supermarkets, says a new University of Illinois study.

"The biggest effect the vouchers had was related to the quality of participants' diets. Those who used the farmers market vouchers ate a greater variety of vegetables and were more likely to choose fruits or vegetables as snacks (57.3%) over those who did shop at the farmers markets (46.7%)," said Karen Chapman-Novakofski, according to the June 3, 2014 news release, "Farmers markets inspire WIC moms, but grocery-store produce costs less." Chapman-Novakofski is a University of Illinois College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences (U of I) professor of nutrition.

In the study, 377 participants were recruited from the WIC Clinic in Champaign, Illinois, and surveyed on their dietary intake and habits. Meanwhile, prices were collected every two weeks at area grocery stores and farmers markets

The median intake for both vegetables and fruit among study participants was two servings a day, but almost 70 percent did not meet the national recommendation for amount of vegetables eaten daily, and about 25 percent did not eat the recommended amount of fruit.

USDA uses farmers market vouchers nationwide to allow WIC mothers to purchase more vegetables than they could otherwise afford. About half the participating mothers received vouchers for farmers markets; the other half did not. Fifty-seven percent of participants who used the vouchers had never shopped at a farmers market before.

"Growing and selling fruits and vegetables locally is a vital exposure and access point for clients who have challenges with accessing and consuming enough fruits and vegetables," said Brandon Meline, according to the news release. Meline is director of maternal and child health at the Champaign-Urbana (Ill.) Public Health District.

The WIC farmers market voucher program has been important in giving many residents the possibility of increasing their intake variety, Meline added, according to the news release. "The average number of vouchers received was two at a total value of around $6.00.This may not be enough to have a significant impact on vegetable intake. For instance, according to the Economic Research Service, the average cost per pound of green beans is $3.23, and a pound provides about three cups of vegetables.

"So the most direct effect the vouchers could have had on vegetable intake was about six cups of vegetables for the participant and her children. Indirectly, however, the vouchers may have contributed to the mother's choice to serve vegetables, what types of vegetables will be served, and maintaining a positive attitude about eating them.

"The farmers market vouchers may serve as a gateway to exposure to more fruits and vegetables, and clients would use other sources of food dollars to maintain fruit and vegetable intake," Chapman-Novakofski noted. The Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommend increased vegetable consumption to reduce the risk of heart disease, certain cancers, obesity, type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, osteoporosis, and kidney stones. Not only are vegetables low in calories, they are powerhouses of vitamins, minerals, and phytochemicals that are important for keeping us healthy," she said, according to the news release.

So is the WIC farmers market voucher program a success? And should it be continued?

The jury's still out, said Chapman-Novakofski, according to the news release. "This study has shaped our thinking about the way we promote these markets to economically disadvantaged women. Farmers markets are a good place to find fresh, appealing produce, and they provide a venue for cooking demonstrations and nutrition education, but economically disadvantaged moms need to be able to purchase produce at the best prices," she noted. "It's important to note that not all farmers markets are more expensive than supermarkets. In some areas and in different states, they are less expensive," she added, according to the news release.

Chapman-Novakofski said, in the news release, that researchers see differences in farmers market use among states that have longer growing seasons. "We'd also like to know how much of the food purchased at farmers markets is eaten. And we're interested in how consumers view the quality of farmers market produce and the kinds of fruits and vegetables they most often purchase." At the very least, the study provides food for thought and may influence public policy in the future, she said, according to the news release.

Speaking of farms, rye and barley products facilitate blood glucose and appetite regulation, says recent research

Evidence from observational studies indicates that diets rich in whole grain reduce risk of obesity and other diseases related to the metabolic syndrome e.g. type 2 diabetes and cardio-vascular disease. You may wish to check out the 2010 study, "Rye and barley products facilitate blood glucose and appetite regulation." The issue for some is that barley and rye contain gluten, and there are people with bad reactions to various cereal grains who can't eat grains containing gluten, but they can eat gluten-free grains such as quinoa, amaranth, corn, and rice, all of which can be ground into flour for baking or various types of cooking or pasta-making. And some people even grind lentils or chick peas into flour/meal or use oat bran for baking, using an electric coffee grinder.

The mechanisms involved in how barley may help to normalize blood sugar/glucose levels are only partially elucidated. Hulled, not pearled barley is what you want to eat for the soluble and insoluble fiber and the B-vitamins, if you are able to tolerate barley. You also may wish to check out the abstract of a study from 2008, published in the Journal of Nutrition, "Including indigestible carbohydrates in the evening meal of healthy subjects improves glucose tolerance, lowers inflammatory markers, and increases satiety after a subsequent standardized breakfast."

If you've heard of the European Union's Integrated Project known as 'Healthgrain', the Healthgrain project has substantially strengthened the scientific basis for a new generation of cereal based products with enhanced health benefits. The project also has formed a network of research organizations, industries and organizations communicating to consumers that will continue as the Healthgrain Forum.

Results of the project were presented recently in the Healthgrain Conference in Lund, Sweden, according to the site, healthgrain.org. The research has been coordinated by Academy Professor Kaisa Poutanen from VTT Technical Research Center of Finland. Work within HEALTHGRAIN has revealed novel insights regarding some potential mechanisms, according to studies such as, "Rye and barley products facilitate blood glucose and appetite regulation" from the VTT Technical Research Center of Finland.

Can barley help those with metabolic syndrome?

Addition of whole grain barley products with slow glycemic response and rich in dietary fiber and resistant starch in test meals significantly improved insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetic subjects as compared with whole grain wheat or white wheat, according to that study in Finland.

One of the reasons why insulin sensitivity was improved is because barley products are rich in indigestible carbohydrates (dietary fiber and resistant starch). And barley facilitates glycemic regulation through a mechanism involving fermentation by gut micro-organisms.

Fermentation in the research has been associated with release of specific gut hormones (GLP-1), with acknowledged benefits on a variety of parameters associated with reduced risk of the metabolic syndrome, including benefits on perceived satiety. How the process works is that the gut hormone, GLP-1 is currently investigated for use as an antidiabetic, antiobesity drug, but appears to be produced endogenously in healthy subjects after intake of certain whole grain barley products rich in indigestible carbohydrates.

Which grains produce a healthier blood glucose profile after eating?

Additionally, rye products generally produce a beneficial blood glucose profile following a meal, with a low and sustained blood glucose response. Rye products also induced lowered insulin response compared with white wheat, promoted higher post-meal satiety, and induced lowered voluntary energy intake at a subsequent meal. Studies within 'Healthgrain' indicate that different rye genotypes vary with respect to benefits on glycemic regulation and insulin demand.

The results are in favor of metabolic benefits of an increased consumption of in particular whole grain barley products with low glycemic response, and foods made of certain rye varieties. The results provide tools for tailoring of whole grain cereal products with magnified health benefits adjunct to the metabolic syndrome.

At the Division of Applied Nutrition and Food Chemistry, Faculty of Engineering in Lund University, Sweden, food-related nutritional research is carried out with the aim of gaining an understanding of how the composition and properties of food affect the health of the consumer. Special interest is being focused on the possibility of optimizing the nutritional content and health-promoting properties in general through the selection of raw materials and processes in the production of foodstuffs.

A particular focus is on the quality characteristics of carbohydrates and proteins, and on the possible link between the gut microbiota and host metabolism. Within the subject of food chemistry, reactions are being studied in the handling, storage and processing of foodstuffs. Great importance is afforded to the development of new and specific methods for food analysis.

One of the organization's most important projects is concerned with the changes in dietary fiber during processing. Another central area is the study of the Maillard reaction in relation to safe food. One example would be the production of carcinogenic substances during the heating of food, and their effects. For more information, see the applied nutrition site.

Optimizing blood glucose control

Another study seeks to improve stroke outcomes by optimizing blood glucose controlAbout 40 percent of ischemic stroke patients arrive at the hospital with high blood glucose levels that can worsen their brain damage, say physicians working to stop the additional loss.

Insulin, a hormone that enables cells to use glucose as energy, can help, but questions remain about the optimal way to give it, said Dr. Askiel Bruno, stroke specialist at the Medical College of Georgia at Georgia Health Sciences University. He's a Clinical Principal Investigator on a National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-funded study that should determine whether intravenous delivery or the usual shot of insulin works best. Other Clinical Principal Investigators for the trial enrolling 1,400 participants nationally are Dr. Christiana E. Hall, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, and Dr. Karen C. Johnston, University of Virginia School of Medicine.

A quick finger prick to check blood glucose levels is part of the early evaluation of all stroke patients in the emergency room, whether or not they are diabetic, Bruno said. It's important not only because of the association with increased damage but because the symptoms of low glucose can mimic stroke symptoms.

"When blood glucose is high the damage is worse so lowering that glucose right away, should result in less damage and better outcomes for patients," he said in the news release, "Study seeks to improve stroke outcomes by optimizing blood glucose control."

Exactly why blood glucose levels rise dramatically with a stroke is not completely understood, but it's known that stroke triggers the release of stress hormones that interfere with insulin's ability to coax glucose into cells, Bruno said, according to the news release. A leading theory is that free radicals produced by stroke also pile on the damage.

"The body just does not respond to insulin as it should and stress hormones interfere with the response," Bruno said in the news release. In a more chronic situation, an elevated blood glucose also is a major risk factor for stroke, he explained in the news release, "Study seeks to improve stroke outcomes by optimizing blood glucose control."

When acute high blood glucose levels are detected in stroke patients – 150 milligrams per deciliter or greater versus a healthy 100 or less – most typically get a shot of insulin. When those levels are particularly difficult to control, patients may get an intravenous dose instead, which requires closer monitoring but seem to work faster and better at getting and keeping levels safe.

The "Shine Trial" directly compares stroke outcome using the two approaches to determine the most efficacious, Bruno said. Study participants will receive insulin for up to three days – when the brain's circulation should be more stable – then resume standard care. At three months, stroke recovery will be objectively assessed.

Lowering the blood glucose/sugar levels of stroke victims within four hours of the stroke

"How are you doing? That is the key question. We may find intravenous works better for some patients than others," said Bruno who led a small pilot study at Indiana University School of Medicine that showed that within four hours, intravenous insulin reduced stroke patients' blood glucose levels 31 percent more than shots.

Stroke is the third leading cause of death in the United States, affecting nearly 800,000 Americans annually, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. About 85 percent of strokes are ischemic, which means portions of the brain aren't getting enough oxygen. The remainder result from brain bleeding. The clotbuster tPA is currently the only Food and Drug Administration-approved drug therapy for ischemic stroke and only about 5 percent of patients receive the drug which must be given within four-and-one-half hours after the onset of symptoms.

Both the soluble and insoluble fiber in barley lowers blood sugar levels after eating usual meals. But more important that barley's ability to lower blood glucose levels is its ability to lower excess insulin in the bloodstream as well.

This is important because you don't want excess insulin levels staying in your blood to more rapidly age your arteries and organs. What you want are your body's glucose and insulin responses tempered after a meal. The longer-term effects of eating barley if you don't have diabetes has been studied. The conclusion of these studies reported that after 12 weeks of eating barley, scientists found that daily ingestion of soluble barley fiber significantly reduced fasting serum insulin values. You also may wish to check out the abstract of a 2009 study, "Endosperm and whole grain rye breads are characterized by low post-prandial insulin response and a beneficial blood glucose profile," published in the Nutrition Journal.

When oral glucose tolerance tests were given, the daily eating of soluble barley fiber also significantly reduced fasting serum insulin values along with those lowered blood glucose responses, according to the study, "Reduced viscosity barley beta-glucan versus placebo: a randomized controlled trial of the effects on insulin sensitivity for individuals at risk for diabetes mellitus." The study is published in the journal Nutritional Metabolism (London), August 16, 2011.

Besides being associated with weight control, barley can minimize overall calorie ingestion because barley is high in protein and fiber

In the study, "Reduced viscosity Barley β-Glucan versus placebo: a randomized controlled trial of the effects on insulin sensitivity for individuals at risk for diabetes mellitus," barley helped to improve insulin sensitivity among hyperglycemic individuals with no prior diagnosis of type 2 diabetes.

Although in that study, there was no change in body weight, the question is for those with high insulin spikes and low blood sugar (hypoglycemia) after eating a sugary meal or cookie on an empty stomach, can the soluble fiber in barley help to normalize blood glucose levels? And can the insoluble fiber from barley also help make healthier insulin levels in the bloodstream?

You don't want to buy polished pearl barley with the hull scratched off. So buy hulled barley not pearled barley. In the study, the findings suggested eating 6 g/d BBG consumed in a beverage over 12 weeks may improve insulin sensitivity among hyperglycemic individuals with no prior diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, and who experience no change in body weight, according to the study in the journal Nutritional Metabolism.

Hulled, not pearled barley is what you want to eat for the soluble and insoluble fiber and the B-vitamins

Research has shown that hulled, not pearled barley is a rich source of soluble and insoluble fiber that can reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes. The most important part of the barley is the insoluble fiber. If you look at the studies, they show that consumption of insoluble dietary fiber found in certain whole grains such as hulled barley is a rich source of soluble fiber. Check out the research at What can barley do for you ? - Barley World.

Food barley is both soluble and insoluble. But researchers have identified beta-glucans the primary component in barley that is responsible for lowering cholesterol. Based on scientific evidence, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) finalized a rule in 2006 allowing barley foods to carry a health claim specific to soluble fiber and coronary heart disease.

Researchers are not talking about beer barley. It's hulled food barley that has been studied for health benefits because hulled food barley contains beta-glucan.

Barley for beer is used specifically for beer making because it has to be low in beta-glucan to make good beer. On the other hand, barley for food must be high in beta-glucan. Beta-glucan is the primary building block of cell walls in the grains of both barley and oats. Wheat and rye have cell walls too, but they don't contain beta-glucan.

That's one reason why you get higher insulin spikes after eating wheat or rye, which also contain gluten. Although barley contains gluten, it also contains beta-glucan. What makes beta-glucan so special (for food) is that it's a source of insoluble and soluble dietary fiber. Fiber is so vital for good health that the Institute of Medicine recommends at least 25 grams per day for everyone over the age of four.

What you're looking for is insoluble fiber because some of the insoluble fiber in barley is digested by bacteria in your colon to produce short-chain fatty acids, which in turn can promote bowel health as well as help repair the mucosa of your colon, also helping those with ulcerative colitis, according to the April 2013 Life Extension Magazine article on page 38, "Foods That Safely Reduce Blood Glucose." Or you may wish to check out the abstract of a 2010 study, "Metabolic effects of whole grain wheat and whole grain rye in the C57BL/6J mouse," that appears in the journal Nutrition.