Headline you never see: Republicans block census citizenship question.
Another you never see: Democrats block Census citizenship question.
The reason you never see the first question as an MSM news headline is that Republicans don't object to asking the people being counted to determine the apportionment of the political power in this country among the States, the following question on a census form:
"Are you a U.S. citizen?"
The reason you never see the second question as a headline is that when Democrats, voting in the Democratic Party-controlled U.S. Senate, make it illegal to ask such an obviously relevant question, their PC-police allies in the Drive-by media, acting as an "accessory after the fact", takes the Fifth, and refuses to name the Democratic actors in the original crime with the generic headline:
"Senate blocks census US-citizenship question"
"Senate"?
Are the Democrats proud of their vote or not and are we also not permitted to ask them questions not on a census form?
Given the vile excuse for journalism most Americans depend on, is it any wonder that so many have yet to discern the stark differences between the parties on economics, common sense immigration policies, defending the country and law and order in general.
So many members of the "World's Oldest Political Party" are either: simply unaware of how many of their representatives simply do not share their values (and work to directly undermine their values with their votes in Congress) as opposed to the conservative acts they put on during campaigns; or, are in denial. I realize now that I was in denial about that party until I left it in 2000, but I digress.
Even Barack Obama gave the wink and nod to the far left while purposefully sounding conservative in the campaign, but the champion frauds can usually be identified today as "Blue Dawgs". Not one of 60, too Yellow to ask a simple question, Dawgs in the Senate turned blue enough not to cower to the PC police and lobby for illegal immigration.
I haven't heard the President asked his position on this question. But does anyone really wonder? The Rule of Law means nothing to some dogs, no matter the color.
And just hearing of all the alleged eye and ear witnesses to radical anti-American statements made by the Muslim-convert shooter before today's shooting at Fort Hood, it is obvious that the PC-police are hazardous to the health of the United States military and America itself.
Mike DeVine’s Charlotte Observer and Minority Report columns
"One man with courage makes a majority." - Andrew Jackson
Comments
Still blocked from Kavon's site...
But this is really in poor taste mike. Let the bodies cool before you try to use the mention of their deaths for political gain.
Speaking the truth in hard times is hardly exploiting for political gain, it's courageous.
For some to whom the truth is distasteful, the time will never be right. And as if that gratuitous bodies cooling crack wasn't in poor taste.
Let your conscience be your guide and never be afraid to strike while the iron is hot, even if it's too hot for some to handle.
Yeah, because you would rather exploit the deaths of US servicemen to score cheap political points. Its curious that you get such a "buzz" off an attack at a US military base.
Criticizing Democrats on the census is fair game - throwing in a line about dead soldiers in an attempt to get headlines is in poor taste.
Matthew, I am just asking questions, not exploiting any one's deaths. I am in the innocent death prevention business, and lessons are often best learned with stark examples of lessons not learned. I suggest a hypothetical based on the allegations against the shooter. Shouldn't subversives be separated from loyal soldiers? obviously
I draw no conclusion about this accused, yet.
and
THX IMB
I heard one news commentary report the Ft, Hood Shooter had cost American tax-payers a million dollars to educate and train this military muslim. All muslims may not be terroist but seems , most terroist are muslims. The morning after the shootings, a great deal of information coming forth, pointing to this murderer having well-known anti-American sentiments.And still remained in uniform, still drawing tax=payer money and still counseling Americam soilders. The enemy is among and with-in. An out-rage this is tolerated, ie, anti-american embedded among soldiers to counsel them,as reported this morning.
Anne Cleveland
octogenariansblog.com
So in addition to being a snitty hissy-fitter who makes tasteless body-cooling cracks to get HIS politically-exploitative point across, hypocrite Matthew has to lie about others' motives.
Got something to say?
Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!