There is not, and never has been, any solid evidence of anything having evolved from a lower form. Everyone knows that there are numerous instances of what is referred to as 'micro-evolution" and there has never been any argument against it. But the evolving from one species to another, 'macro-evolution', is completely without evidence or common sense. It is amazing that it has become accepted by any person as being true. Just why do people accept and debate the subject is astounding, however, there are a number of reasons for it. All ridiculous.
Those who have chosen to believe and endorse it as factual should be ashamed of themselves. Their reasoning is terribly unbecoming that of highly educated and intelligent persons. In their effort to convince others of their imaginary 'facts', they show rather their pre-determined mindsets and beyond that, their self imagined superiority.
Most hold resentment towards those who have a belief differing from their own and use extreme intimidation to silence them. Even though their evidence is far greater than those who endorse organic evolution. Many appear to accept the supposition of evolution for fear of endangering their career. This is absolutely criminal and there should be laws against it. Read the following comments.
“Scientists who go about teaching that evolution is a fact of life are great con men, and the story they are telling may be the greatest hoax ever. In explaining evolution we do not have one iota of fact … It is a tangled mishmash of guessing games and figure jaggling … If evolution occurred at all, it was probably in a very different manner than the way it is now taught” (Theodore N. Tahmisian, a nuclear physicist with the Atomic Energy Commission, quoted in the Fresno Bee, Aug. 20, 1959).
"If life had evolved into its wondrous profusion of creatures little by little, Dr. Eldredge argues, then one would expect to find fossils of transitional creatures which were a bit like what went before them and a bit like what came after. But no one has yet found any evidence of such transitional creatures. This oddity has been attributed to gaps in the fossil record which gradualists expected to fill when rock strata of the proper age had been found. In the last decade, however, geologists have found rock layers of all divisions of the last 500 million years and no transitional forms were contained in them." (The Guardian Weekly, 26 Nov 1978, vol 119, no 22, p. 1)
"If you read Julian Huxley, P. A. Moody, G. G. Simpson, T. Dobzhansky, and others and you will find the following statements. The mathematical odds of a man, a mammal, or a fruitfly coming into existence accidentally by the united effects of all the mutations in one group of animals is represented by a number so large that it would fill a large novel with naughts. Or, a number larger then all the electrons and protons in the known universe. They postulate that selection must have taken place. Nothing is said concerning the mode of selection or the probability of mutant alleles in two different animals occuring and finding each other simultaneously. They state that favorable mutations occur at a rate of one per 100,000 and two in 100,0002, and twenty mutations in one animal that may show a difference has a chance of one in 1 X 1025. They admit that such odds are ridiculous. These probabilities are discarded and hope is based upon the improbabilities." (Excerpt from speech by Theodore N. Tahmisian, B.A., M.S., Ph.D.)
If a cell is irradiated for a long period one would expect some mutations to occur. The primordia of the Sequoia gigantea have been irradiated by cosmic, nuclide, and ultraviolet rays for two thousand years. Since both the male and female gametes are found on the same plant there is an effective irradiation of four thousand years. Some deletions may have produced nonviable seeds, but the fertile seeds produce trees identical to the parent tree. The fit survive because they have the attributes of their parents. Others have become unfit through deletions. The theory of evolution postulates that ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny. If the higher phyla evolved they must have evolved through mutations. Mutations are invariably recessive. Further mutations should cause decapitulation. Of the thousands of observations decapitulation has not been observed or produced experimentally. The latest avenue of escape for the theory of evolution is the proposition that the species were formed through an explosive event. If we must call it an explosion, the Bible notes six explosions during the time of creation whose exploder is the Triune God. Carbon dating has not found anything older than 20,000 years. Those items found to be older than 10,000 years are invariably of plant origin. (See Libby 1952). (Ibid)
Many other scientists deny the theory of organic evolution, yet those who promote it continue to use every bit of authority they hold, to insist that their wild guess be taught in schools as scientific fact. Their deep involvement in attempts to defend this fallacy, is a tremendous hindrance to their other more beneficial and sensible scientific discoveries.
With all of the many knowledgeable scientists who oppose the evolution fantasy, and the many other proofs of Biblical integrity and authority, one should not be intimidated by their insistence upon acceptance of it. Schools should be allowed to teach the truths of their lack of evidence and teach the truths of the Biblical account of all these otherwise unanswered questions.
Remember this, not one single fossil has ever been discovered which proves a link between species, or what the Bible refers to as "kinds". When someone tells you different...they are lying. Walk away from them.
Click here for a website with over 21 pages of some 40+ reputable scientists who signed a statement titled "A Scientific Dissent on Darwinism". Yet those who hold positions of authority refuse to allow public schools to teach the contents of that statement.