Americaslibrary.gov: U.S. Capitol & Flag
This article is Part I of a multi-part series investigating the September 11, 2001 false flag operation as a hyperdimensional ET event
There is empirical evidence supporting the hypothesis that the events of September 11, 2001 (“9/11”), which involved attacks upon the World Trade Center in New York City, and the Pentagon in Washington, D.C., may in fact have been a hyperdimensional “false flag operation”. The hypothesis that 9/11 may be a hyperdimensional false flag operation is advanced in HIGH STRANGENESS: Hyperdimensions and the Process of Alien Abduction, a book by France-based author Laura Knight-Jadczyk. The term “hyperdimensional” means “of or pertaining to a system having more dimensions than naturally found in our universe.” “False flag operations” are defined as “covert operations conducted by governments, corporations, or other organizations, which are designed to deceive the public in such a way that the operations appear as though they are being carried out by other entities. The name is derived from the military concept of flying false colors; that is, flying the flag of a country other than one's own. False flag operations are not limited to war and counter-insurgency operations, and have been used in peace-time; for example, during Italy's strategy of tension.”
The model of 9/11 which a “critical channeling” research source sets out in Knight-Jadczyk’s book holds that the events of September 11, 2001 were in fact a “hyperdimensional false flag operation”, created with converging planning and involvement of a 3rd density “consortium” of corrupt human military and elites and 4th density hostile reptilian (hyperdimensional) Extraterrestrials. The purpose of this series of investigative articles is to examine the evidence supporting this hypothesis about 9/11.
According to the hyperdimensional model, 3rd density refers to the space-time dimension of reality that we humans conventionally inhabit. In the 4th density, time is no longer the regulating dimension it is in our 3rd density, and 4th density beings can travel backward and forwards in time, thus facilitating intervention in 3rd density human public affairs.
This series of articles will investigate 9/11 as a possible hyperdimensional false flag event, including the empirical evidence for (1) 9/11 as a false flag operation by a “consortium” of corrupt human military and elites; (2) the use of exotic weapons in the 9/11 false flag operation; (3) the possibility use of hyperdimensional weapons in the false flag event of 9/11; (4) the evidence for joint operations and agreements between a “consortium” of corrupt human military and elites and hyperdimensional predatory reptilian 4 D Extraterrestrials; (5) how the war crimes network behind the 9/11 false flag event can be brought to justice; (6) how to diminish the destabilizing influence of 4D predatory reptilian Extraterrestrials in human public affairs.
Because of space limitations, this article is limited to evidence for (1) 9/11 as a false flag operation by a “consortium” of corrupt human military and elites. Other components of this investigative series will be covered in future articles.
9/11 as a hyperdimensional false flag operation
As elucidated in a previous Examiner.com article, Laura Knight-Jadczyk’s hypothesis is that a predatory reptilian Extraterrestrial group is targeting our 3rd density human civilization with de-stabilizing events such at the false flag operation of September 11, 2001 in order to ultimately replace our present human civilization with a hybrid reptilian race.
Included in the de-stabilizing targeting operations by predatory reptilian hyperdimensional ETs, is a program of alien abductions sponsored by the 4th density reptilians, and carried out the by 3rd density Gray alien surrogates and black operations of within the military-intelligence world. By one scientific study, up to 6.3 million Americans, or 2% of the U.S. population has been abducted under this hyperdimensional reptilian ET program.
The 9/11 “hyperdimensional false flag operation” model is consistent with empirical evidence gathered at the crime scenes of the 9/11 attacks. (1) There is compelling evidence that the September 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon were a false flag operation conducted by a corrupt military and elite international war crimes racketeering network (“consortium”) using advanced exotic weapons, for the purpose of launching an international war of aggression (War on Terror) and imposing a domestic police state (martial law) worldwide. (2) There is also preliminary evidence of a hyperdimensional involvement in the 9/11 attacks.
If the 9/11 hyperdimensional false flag operation is in any degree factual or true, such a conclusion would have far-reaching implications in any deep analysis of the forces shaping important current world public events, such as the 9/11-inspired War on Terror (2001 – present), and 9/11 inspired domestic police state measures such as the PATRIOT Act in the United States and similar martial law legislation elsewhere.
The 9/11 hyperdimensional model, involving the interaction and coordination of a 3rd density powerful human “consortium” and hostile 4th density Extraterrestrials with whom this consortium has working agreements, also would explain why the mysteries of 9/11 have not been successfully explained to date, either by (co-opted) official investigations, or a community of 9/11 researchers, working world-wide since September 11, 2001, to solve the crimes of 9/11 within a conventional 3D science paradigm.
This exclusive Examiner.com article presents a convergence of science-based evidence about a possible 9/11 hyperdimensional false flag operation not presented elsewhere. The article seeks to investigate new pathways significant step in moving toward a solution of the 9/11 crimes which until now have seemed unsolvable by official bodies, parliamentary initiatives, and a wide, planetary 9/11 research community.
The leaders of the G-20 Nations and most of the other 192 United Member nations and organizations continue publicly to support programs of international wars of aggression and domestic homeland security (police state) measures worldwide by publicly referring to “the terrorist attacks on 9/11” as a pretext.
The evidence in this article serves as a threshold foundation to show that the only “9/11 terrorists” are a consortium of corrupt human military and elites, plausibly acting in concert with hyperdimensional reptilian Extraterrestrials of hostile intent toward humankind. This hostile hyperdimensional 4D reptilian ET intent – in concert with a corrupt human consortium - may be what originally created the false flag operations of 9/11 and continues to be used as a pretext by Earth's 192 national governments and numerous international institutions to create a planet enmeshed in seemingly endless war, crime, disease and povert
9/11 as a false flag operation by a “consortium” of corrupt human military and elites
The issue of establishing operational and legal culpability for the events of September 11, 2001 has deeply divided public opinion in the U.S. and in other societies. One scholarly organization states, “in July of 2006, a Scripps Howard and Ohio University poll concluded that, ‘Thirty-six percent of respondents overall said it is ‘very likely’ or ‘somewhat likely’ that certain federal officials either participated in the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon or took no action to stop them’, and ‘sixteen percent said it's ‘very likely’ or ‘somewhat likely’ that the collapse of the twin towers in New York was aided by explosives secretly planted in the two buildings.’"
Polls of United States and Canadian audiences about 9/11 culpability are somewhat divergent. A poll of New York citizens (targets of the 9/11 attacks) shows a relatively high opinion of a conscious conspiracy by “U.S. Leaders”. “In August of 2004, a Zogby International poll indicated that 49.3% New York City residents and 41% of New York citizens ‘overall’ say US Leaders ‘knew in advance that attacks were planned on or around September 11, 2001, and that they consciously failed to act.’ The poll, released on August 30, 2004, also found that 66% called for a new probe.”
Canadian poll audiences, by contrast tend to be more conservative than the New York 9/11 target audience: “In September of 2006, an Ipsos-Reid poll found that 22 percent of Canadians believe ‘the attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001, had nothing to do with Osama Bin Laden and were actually a plot by influential Americans.’"
We must turn to the law of criminal culpability around the events of 9/11 – and not to public opinion polls - to find a universal standard around which the concept that the events of September 11, 2001 were a false flag operation undertaken by an organized group. The constitutional standards as to what constitutes treason towards the United States, and what constitutes criminal conspiracy or racketeering can provide the objective standard under the laws of evidence. If prima facie evidence of treasonous action and/or criminal conspiracy planning and executing the events of 9/11 can be established, then established constitutional and criminal law provide the basis or proceeding against the perpetrators of 9/11. Prima facie evidence – evidence of criminal culpability which on its face warrants investigation or criminal charges – is the basis by which constitutional societies achieve an objective standard to determine whether or not a “consortium” of corrupt human military and elites planned and caused 9/11 to occur as a false flag operation for specific reasons and outcomes.
The objective legal and evidentiary standards of the 9/11 Treason Independent Prosecutor Act
The Congressional Memorandum accompanying the 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act sets out prima facie evidence that a “consortium” of corrupt human military and elites planned and carried out the false flag operation on September 11, 2001. Both the 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act and the Congressional Memorandum were presented for review and action to senior staff of the Judiciary Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives in November 2006, shortly after the defeat of the Neo-conservative Republicans in the U.S. mid-term elections on November 7, 2006. Senior staff of the Judiciary Committee indicated they would be meeting with and presenting the Congressional Memorandum accompanying the 9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act to the incoming chairman of the U.S. House Judiciary, Rep. John Conyers, Jr. (D-MI) during the 2006 Thanksgiving Break in at the congressman’s headquarters in Detroit, MI. Despite reported statements by senior staff that there was sufficient prima facie evidence in the Congressional Memorandum to proceed with appointment of a public prosecutor to investigate and prosecute apparent treason and war crimes by a “consortium” of corrupt military and elites, no statement was ever issued by the chairman of the U.S. House Judiciary committee, and the draft bill (9/11 Independent Prosecutor Act) still awaits his official action.
You can read the entire text of the Congressional Memorandum here.
It sets out the prima facie evidence that a consortium of corrupt human military and elites planned and coordinated false flag operation on September 11, 2001, which constitutes treason under Article III of the U.S. constitution.
The executive summary of the Act and congressional memorandum, as presented to the chairman of the U.S. House Judiciary Committee, Rep. John Conyers, Jr. is as follows:
Executive Summary - The September 11 Treason Independent Prosecutor Act
Question: What Is the September 11 Treason Independent Prosecutor Act?
Answer: The Act is a Public Act of the United States Congress, and a Joint Resolution of the U.S. Senate and U.S. House of Representatives in the U.S. Congress. Any U.S. Senator and any U.S. Representative at no cost can introduce it simply by handing the Act to the Clerk according to official rules.
Question: What is the purpose of the September 11 Treason Independent Prosecutor Act?
Answer: The act would appoint an independent prosecutor under the authority of Article III (3) of the U.S. Constitution to prosecute treason against these United States of America by then U.S. President George W. Bush, U.S. Vice President Richard B. Cheney, U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld and other John and Jane Does for planning and carrying out the acts of treason, as defined in Article III (3) of the U.S. Constitution, by conspiring to carry out, carrying out, and/or causing to be carried out an armed attack upon these United States on September 11, 2001, as part of a False Flag Operation. Article III of the U.S. Constitution provides that, "Sect. 3. Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort...."
On September 11, 1998, the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee released a report by Independent Prosecutor, Kenneth Starr, which eventually led to an Article of Impeachment against President William Jefferson Clinton under Article II of the U.S. Constitution.
Question: What are the main grounds for concluding that there is prima facie evidence that the named individuals – then U.S. President George W. Bush, U.S. Vice President Richard B. Cheney, U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld - abused the power of their office and committed Article III Treason on September 11, 2001?
Answer: This is what the congressional memorandum accompanying The September 11, 2001 Treason Independent Prosecutor Act states:
VII. Summation: The 9/11 Attacks as Acts of Treason
The facts recited above constitute prima facie evidence that the named individuals---then U.S. President George W. Bush, U.S. Vice President Richard B. Cheney, U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld---and other John and Jane Does are independently and jointly guilty of Treason against these United States under Article III (3) of the U.S. Constitution, because:
I. The attacks of 9/11, as portrayed in the official account, could not have succeeded if standard operating procedures between the FAA and NORAD had been followed. The Pentagon, then under the leadership of Donald Rumsfeld, has provided three mutually inconsistent accounts of NORAD’s response, which means that at least two of them are false. Moreover, a wide range of facts, including evidence that the FAA had notified NORAD in a timely fashion, contradicts the third account, articulated by the 9/11 Commission. There must have been stand-down orders, and these could have come only from the highest levels of the Pentagon and the White House.
II. Overwhelming evidence exists that the collapses of the Twin Towers and Building 7 were instances of controlled demolition. But al-Qaeda operatives could not have obtained the needed access to the buildings to plant the explosives and would not have ensured that the buildings come straight down. The controlled demolition, therefore, had to be the work of insiders. That President Bush was one of those insiders is suggested by the fact that his brother and cousin were principals in the company in charge of WTC security. Complicity at the highest levels of the federal government is also indicated by the removal of evidence (the collapsed steel), which is normally a federal offense. Finally, if the airplane strikes could have occurred only with the consent of the president and the secretary of defense (as suggested in the previous point), the coordination of these strikes with the demolition of the buildings implies their involvement in the latter as well.
III. Overwhelming evidence also exists for the conclusion that the attack on the Pentagon was an inside job. That the official story could not be true is evident from many facts: Hani Hanjour’s incompetence; the choice of the west wing as the target; the impossibility of a commercial airliner’s coming back to Washington undetected and hitting the Pentagon unless permitted; and the lack of physical evidence consistent with an attack by a Boeing 757. That the strike was an inside job is implied by the falsity of the official story, the evidence that the strike was made by a military aircraft, the removal of evidence, and the government’s refusal to release videos of the strike. This operation could hardly have been planned without the involvement of then Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld.
IV. Complicity at the highest levels of the federal government is also indicated by then President Bush’s remaining at the school after it was evident---given the truth of the official account---that the United States was experiencing a surprise attack. This behavior makes sense only if Bush and his lead Secret Service agent knew that there would be no attack on the school.
V. The complicity of then Vice President Cheney in the attack on the Pentagon and the downing of Flight 93 is implied by the testimony of Secretary Mineta in conjunction with the false claims of the 9/11 Commission, under the guidance of administration insider Philip Zelikow, as to when Cheney went to the PEOC and when he issued the shoot-down authorization.
VI. The conclusion from the evidence that members of the then Bush administration orchestrated the attacks of 9/11 is reinforced by the fact that they had some huge projects---prosecuting wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and obtaining funding to accelerate the technological transformation of the military---that would likely be possible only in the event of “a new Pearl Harbor.”
Caveat lector: This memorandum is based upon the best public research resources presently available. It is presented not as a full treatment of the subject but as merely a brief summary pointing to the existence of sufficient prima facie evidence to warrant the appointment of an independent prosecutor.
Question: Where can I find more information about the September 11, 2001 Treason Independent Prosecutor Act?
Answer: You can find more information at the Internet information website for the 9/11 Treason Independent Prosecutor Act at:
http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/911/
Here are some useful links:
The September 11, 2001 Treason Independent Prosecutor Act
Http://Peaceinspace.Blogs.Com/911/2006/01/The_September_1.Html
Congressional memorandum
Http://Peaceinspace.Blogs.Com/911/2006/01/Memorandum_Summ.Html
Executive Summary
http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/911/2006/01/executive_summa.html
This prima facie evidence that a “consortium” of corrupt human military and elites caused the attacks of September 11, 2001 as a false flag operation is the first component of a number of component this series of articles establishes in assembling an avenue of solution to the mystery of 9/11. Let us now proceed to the second component – exotic weapons as well as intentional misdirection or psyops used in the false flag operation of September 11, 2001.
The use of exotic weapons in the 9/11 false flag operation
To be continued in Part II of this investigative series on 9/11 as a hyperdimensional false flag operation.
|
Note: Permission is granted to include extracts of this article on websites and email lists provided a link is included to the original. This article is copyright © and should not be added in its entirity on other websites or email lists without author's written permission. For permission please contact: exopolitics@exopolitics.com |
Comments
While this hypothesis is plausible, it is unnecessary and Occam's Razor would encourage us to discard it.
For those unfamiliar with William of Ockam, he formulated the common sense axiom that simple hypotheses are far more often correct than complex ones. Thus, if you hear the sound of hooves clop-clopping behind you on an American city street, then, yes, it might indeed be a zebra walking behind you. But the smart money goes with the hypothesis that it is a horse.
In this case, ample work has been done to establish that a controlled demolition closely correlates with the observed characteristics of the collapse, and that it was possible for US government operatives to gain sufficient access to the buildings to set up the demolition (see the excellent work of Richard Gage at Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth www.ae911truth.org). As the article points out, this is by far the most likely explanation and is consistent with everything the Bush-Cheney neo-con cabal said they would do before being elected (see the Project for a New American Century call for a "new Pearl Harbour").
If one some I knew had died in the WTC, I'd be outraged that such nonsense has been written. But I don't know anyone who died so I'll stick to what I can see in this article.
Despite, a repititious use of phrases such as "empirical evidence" and "science based", I do not see one iota of even circumstantial evidence that "hyperdimensional repitilians", should they even exist, prodded mindless human sheep to do their evil bidding. If anything is mindless here, it is the authors heaping of wild speculation onto of the rather flakey beliefs one Laura Knight-Jadcyzk. Not a sound basis for "science based" analysis.
And while I would agree that the collapse of the WTC certain appears to look like a controlled demolition, whether it actually was or not is far from certain and definitely not supported by "overwhelming evidence".
This article does however come up trumps in tainting both civilian ET/UFO and 911 research. Caveat lector indeed.
Are you sensorin' me?
911 inconsistencies are many: the "Match strategy" evidence outlined by Barbara Honegger, the 911 hijacker suspects implicated in CIA-Afghanistan heroin trafficking as outlined by investigative journalist Daniel Hopsicker in his book Welcome to Terrorland, and more. The stand-down may, in part, be an artifact of the Match strategy. A more plausible scenario would be that, rather than reptilians (which would normally seem less evolved, hence not "4th density"), breeding program operatives of the gray alignment in our midst would have stronger motives for variously either directly supporting or favoring what happened on 911.
Phillip Krapf outlines a direct contact experience in which the grays were shown to work with other aliens much like the grays, in various ways. No reptilian was seen onboard. And given a large-scale breeding program to create human-alien hybrids, some of whom look human after 3-4 generations being bred back with humans, we would do well to look to see who, among us, might be part of such a scheme. If a large aggregation of aliens is abducting and breeding such, it isn't for extraneous purposes. Abductee reports described by David Jacobs show a pattern of re-infiltration. John Mack suggested a similar pattern.
But why? The most obvious place to look for such would be among those most suspicious in the 9-11 matter: royal Sauds, who gave large sums of money directly to 911 hijacker suspects (Sauds also fund the Taliban), Rothschilds and such. The Bush Sr.-Rockefeller connection is also mass criminal/suspicious. There have been specific reports in this regard. Here's a quote from Phillip Krapf's first book. In the quote, aliens of an older, more widespread group that dominates the gray aliens' alignment speak about a previous intervention on an emergent planet:
As Phillip Krapf notes in his second book, in the past the dominant aliens of the grays' alignment have assigned parties to monitor some reluctant conscript planets (considered hostile) in order “to maintain the program of sabotage in the event future generations might once again try” to go into space. The dominant aliens of the gray alignment told Krapf they were referring to warlike populations that they had encountered, but the same attitude may apply to all who reject a gray alignment incursion. The aliens who met with Krapf told him that in some past cases, their sabotage has led to manipulated warfare on some planets, the destruction of others. One of those aliens told Krapf they infiltrated some 10,000 of their operatives onto one planet, allowing them to become “heads of military units, key scientists, government leaders, and chief executives of industrial complexes, including armament manufacturers. Through sabotage, subterfuge, misdirection, persuasion over great masses of the host populations, and careful manipulation of government policy,” they achieved their ends on the given planet. (The Challenge of Contact, p. 76-77) Please remember, that Krapf's books are first-hand reporting by a clear-headed, Pulitzer-winning journalist. His report is partly corroborated by hundreds of others, including military brass who served in the White House.
The point I'm trying to make is that 911 doesn't pass the smell test, sure, but to mix in Laura Knight-Jadcyzk's idea of reptilians seems to be shooting in the dark. Reptilians wouldn't be as advanced as other aliens, certainly not more capable or influential than are gray alignment aliens. Some reports of reptilians seem like disinformation (see Cathy O'Brien's viewing of Bush Sr. and reptilian imagery--just imagery, not real characteristics: O'Brien felt she was being "programmed" to see such). And Alex Collier's story about 18 foot tall reptilians who have mastered the Milky Way sounds very far-fetched, to me. Collier may have had some contacts, but the most capable aliens won't be reptilians. Brain wins out over brawn, as far as we can see. Reptilians would probably be far behind the pack.
In general, aliens tend to share or essentially steal other aliens' genes, causing a cross pollination, leaving little room for any fluke reptilian intelligents to remain long unaffected.
We have harder evidence for gray aliens and their associates, but only anecdotal and sometimes inconsistent accounts re reptilians. If abductors can create fake images to obscure specific memories of grays or tall grays doing an abduction, a reptilian theme would be a perfect foil, in a sense. To leave people talking about supposedly intelligent, technologically advanced reptiles that eat people would help to discredit those who talk about aliens. The general public finds such talk improbable.
Is there internal, social and broad consistency with other alien reports when we talk about reptilians? No. That strain of reportage is relatively thin, not part of most abductee and in-flight sightings. Again, there may be intelligent reptilians somewhere in the universe, but if there are they would probably eat cooked food, read books, and abhor classist violence and predations.
In short, what is the best evidence, and how does it appear to fit together?
Alfred, your are one of most nice way to tell story that related 911. most of people not have experience with hyper dimensional ET, hyper being. so maybe not easy to understand what your telling. I'm sure many people come from many different planet and different hyper space.
not sure to tell reptilian, gray alien is something ... like that way. that way to say is same as to say Earth people is something. there is many different Earth people in this planet and other planet and different hyper space.
anyway for me Manhattan is since April / May 1998, This planet is since 1995, many changes happened that related hyper space.
unfortunately 911 is one of event for this planet. my understanding is in case Earth government can tell story that hyper space City Manhattan start in April / May 1998 then maybe no need to happen 911 like event.
we can see strange light that before air plane go into Building. I'm continue to looking in Part II for The use of exotic weapons.
There's always a targET,for a rackET.That's the tickET The planET,is to invade by THE markET.You can continue to use the bullET, as your nET to deceive.I find the correct[PROFIT] prophET,should sound the trumpET.End the quiETness,spread truth.We are being deceived .911 was committed in a serious of steps for a NWO---backwards OWN. Speaking of words to see wETness.Patriot Act ? The real magic for containing this word Patriot - breakdown the word >> ~~~Pat-- "riot "--Act.So there will be no RIOT *~* gET Smart -Keep Chaos on the run <*>
I must agree with Rich & patrick on this one. I have not seen any 'evidence' that hyperdimensional ETs where involved in the 9-11 event. I can understand that such a theory could be evaluated in the field of exopolitics.
I have personnally contacted Albert about what i feel is serious misdirection of 2 very important fields of study that need to stay scientific based and rational. It is easy to get lost on the web in stories of reptilians and dulce and the likes however when one claims 'evide
Funny it seems i' being sensored as well even thought my comments were polite and rational.
Show us your evidence or call it a hypothesis. These 2 subjects need to be treated equally with respect, a scientific based approach, rational & fervent passion whil eno loosing touch with reality as difficult as that may be sometimes with these fields.
I have been waiting patiently more than 10 days now to see your evidence and it has yet to be posted.
I still think this is a highly irresponsibl
I suppose part 2 will come out before the next election?
I think the fact that you haven't published your other articles 5 months later after i insisted you show us this 'empirical evidence' demonstrates that you do not have this evidence.
This article was either to promote your friend's book or to mix the 9-11 truth movement & the exopolitics movement as Steven basset had sent an e-mail to his exopolitics members asking them to come up with ways to recruit people around that same timeframe. If you deny this, please POST your evidence so it can be analyzed and rationally discussed. However ... i think i asked you that already and you referred me to one of your books. another plug.
Anyone who does not know that this is more than obvious is either brain washed or a troll. I'm a musician and not a brainiac but with some mild research all of it is common sense. We live on a ball in the sky and come out of our mums bodies attached to an Alien looking cord, with and alien looking water sack...almond shaped eyes, slits for mouths and two holes for a nose. We build space ships and play with lasers and we think we know it all when we deny our own obvious participation in space and the universe.
This stuff is factual. Those buildings turned to dust and that's not possible
by HUMAN current science...and only by space science. Wake up, everything you know right now was because SOMEONE told you, what if that SOMEONE lied?
Wow, so much foolishness to cover the obvious?
http://crazypitch.com/911
There you are, now you know everything.
Some of the finest investigatory and explanatory material present re. 9-11 is Dr. Judy Wood's book which came out several months ago, written as a a large textbook. Her emphasis is on the evidence, NOT on discussions about who. She maintains that until we really have deeply analyzed the what, we can't possibly accurately discuss the WHO. Title: WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? She basically does a great job of proving that controlled demolition is NOT what happened, and far, far more happened, even if you only look at the WTC location and all its destroyed buildings (more than 3), and remember there were several other locations in the news, linked to the WTC disappearing. Get the book and READ it.
Got something to say?
Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!