Skip to main content
Report this ad

See also:

Errors in the King James Bible, part 6

The Bible, fact or fiction
The Bible, fact or fiction
Sterling Ministries

Errors in the King James Bible, part 6.

“As we have stated so many times before in our sessions here,” explained the Reverend J.A. Layman, evangelist with Sterling Ministries, before The Lay School faculty here in Clinton, Tennessee, “anyone who is seriously interested in Bible study needs to learn how to use Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance with Hebrew and Greek Dictionaries. A very large number of alleged ‘errors; in the King James Bible can be explained simply by using Strong’s to determine not only the various meanings of Hebrew and Greek words, but their variant renderings as well in exactly which verses. To illustrate this point let us consider one of the differences (not errors) that Sterling Ministries has found in its side-by-side, verse-by-verse, comparison study of the King James Bible and fifteen other English translations. In Genesis 12:6 of the King James Bible we read:

6 And Abram passed through the land unto the place of Sichem, unto the plain of Moreh. And the Canaanite was then in the land.

The words ‘the plain’ are the focus of our inquiry, for they are rendered in those other fifteen English translations/versions as follows:

The Bishops Bible: the plain

The Geneva Bible: the plaine

The NIV: the tree

The Amplified Bible: the oak or terebinth tree

The Matthews Bible: the oak

The Syriac Peshito: the oak

The Revised Version: the oak

The American Standard Version: the oak

The Revised Standard Version: the oak

The Septuagint: the terebinth tree

The Tanakh: the terebinth

The Douay Rheims Bible: the noble vale

From this list it appears obvious that the vast majority of these translations/versions are NOT in concurrence with the rendering of the King James Version, right? And if we end our investigation here, we will be forced to conclude that the rendering of the King James Version is wrong, DEAD WRONG! (And this is where a great many scholars and pseudo-scholars choose to end their investigation and reporting because it refutes what the King James Bible states. But if we consult Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance and look up the original Hebrew word in its dictionary, we find:

Strong’s #H436

Original Hebrew: אלון

Transliteration: 'êlôn

Pronunciation: ay-lone'

Prolonged from H352; an oak or other strong tree: - plain. See also H356.

Lo and behold, by consulting Strong’s, we find out what THE TRUTH is about this seeming discrepancy: for the original Hebrew word means both tree (oak) AND plain; that is, either translation is correct. But if we had not taken this further step to consult Strong’s, our conclusion would either have to be, (1) that the King James Version is wrong, or (2) that all of these other translations/versions are wrong. And by taking this further step to include Strong’s in our investigation, we come to the real truth, ‘the rest of the story’!”

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Enjoy this article?

Receive email alerts when new articles are available. Just click on the ‘Subscribe’ button above.


Report this ad