Skip to main content
  1. News
  2. Politics
  3. Independent

Edward Snowden should be exonerated

See also

Once in a while a hero comes along. Now some may think this to be rather fluffy, and, perhaps, a Pollyannaish description of someone who’s committed "gross atrocities" against the security of the United States of America. I mean, seriously, ex-CIA chief James Woolsey thinks execution shouldn’t be out of the question. But there’s a bigger picture. Edward Snowden did break laws; however, he did so as a necessity of defense—preventing a greater constitutional harm from continuing to go on; namely, the unbridled search and seizure of our nation’s entire citizenry. Sure there are grey lines to this issue—grey, blurry, even invisible—and that’s the problem. Corruption unseen is unfixable.

In the past, other NSA and intelligence community officials have tried to foster redress but were stymied at every turn. Snowden was clearly aware of these past efforts and strategically took another tack. Now Obama, Congress, the nation, is in the middle of a conversation regarding what limits should be placed on our spying on ourselves—a conversation that would have never happened had Snowden balked at the heroic impulses coursing through his mind last summer.

The question for current administrators of our government (Obama, Justice, Congress, et al) is why press the case against a whistleblower who ultimately has succeeded in exposing real corruptions in the heart of our governing apparatus?

There is good evidence to indicate the path Snowden took was the only way he was going to bring these abuses of power to light. To wit, we have heard testimony from former NSA officials like Kirk Wiebe defending Snowden based on their own experience of attempting to expose the agency’s overreaching acts. What was Snowden to do? By his lights, what was transpiring was unlawful. There is no agency or official above the law—and the highest law in the land is the U.S. Constitution, which the NSA has been undermining by casting a nationwide dragnet. It didn't discriminate against anybody, because it was everybody.

The irony is, is that when people are elected to governmental positions of leadership, like Obama, they will refuse to admit any nuance with regard to executing the laws of the land. Therefore, Snowden has ‘committed numerous felonies and needs to face justice.’ But there is nuance here—who’s looking out for the people’s right to privacy? Who’s making sure agencies aren’t violating constitutional protections? Snowden. And that’s why he should be exonerated and declared that rarest of things, a hero willing to sacrifice his own livelihood, career—even his life—to serve a greater good. If it was up to me, Snowden should get a ticker tape parade.

Advertisement

News

  • Al Qaeda video surfaces
    A video of an Al Qaeda meeting surfaces, concealed identities are raising suspicions
    Video
    Watch Video
  • Boston Marathon
    Boston cops shut down Boylston street after finding suspicious, unattended backpacks
    Top News
  • Death penalty for hate crime?
    Actions by the anti-Semitic gunman are being condemned by the unlikeliest of groups
    Crime News
  • New York gun control
    As many as one million New Yorkers are ready to disregard the state's new gun laws
    Headlines
  • Korean ferry capsizes
    Hundreds of passengers are missing after a ferry sinks off the South Korean coast
    World News
  • NYPD ends surveillance on Muslims
    The NYPD will end surveillance programs against Muslims in their own communities
    Video
    Watch Video

User login

Log in
Sign in with your email and password. Or reset your password.
Write for us
Interested in becoming an Examiner and sharing your experience and passion? We're always looking for quality writers. Find out more about Examiner.com and apply today!