Skip to main content
Report this ad

See also:

Documents prove BP involved in secret plans to exploit Iraq oil pre-invasion

Secret government documents show plans involving BP to exploit Iraq's oil reserves were discussed by government ministers and the world's largest oil companies the year before Britain joined the US to invade Iraq. The movie, FUEL, that airs on CNBC television Thursday night, April 21st, documents secret meetings held before 911 and shows documents with maps of Iraq oil pipelines used at those meetings, all denied in U.S. Congressional hearings by those involved.

Fuel on the Fire is based on 100s of previously unreleased US and UK documents that detail how governments and companies sought to restructure I
Fuel on the Fire is based on 100s of previously unreleased US and UK documents that detail how governments and companies sought to restructure I
Fuel on Fire/Amazon
Documents prove Cheney secret meeting before 911 used Iraq oil maps
Energy Information Administration

"Whereas BP was insisting in public that it had 'no strategic interest' in Iraq, in private it told the Foreign Office that Iraq was "more important than anything we've seen for a long time," reports The Independent.

Many independent researchers who have advised the public about 911 and the BP and other Big oil/government criminal conspiracy to illegally invade and occupy Iraq for oil have been persecuted but today, The Independent newspaper has revealed documents that "raise new questions over Britain's involvement in the war, which had divided Tony Blair's cabinet and was voted through only after his claims that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction."

The Independent reports BP involvement in the Iraq atrocities (that include the ongoing murder of innocent children and other people there):

The documents were not offered as evidence in the ongoing Chilcot Inquiry into the UK's involvement in the Iraq war. In March 2003, just before Britain went to war, Shell denounced reports that it had held talks with Downing Street about Iraqi oil as 'highly inaccurate.' BP denied that it had any "strategic interest" in Iraq, while Tony Blair described "the oil conspiracy theory" as 'the most absurd.'"

But documents from October and November the previous year paint a very different picture.

Five months before the March 2003 invasion, Baroness Symons, then the Trade Minister, told BP that the Government believed British energy firms should be given a share of Iraq's enormous oil and gas reserves as a reward for Tony Blair's military commitment to US plans for regime change.

The papers show that Lady Symons agreed to lobby the Bush administration on BP's behalf because the oil giant feared it was being "locked out" of deals that Washington was quietly striking with US, French and Russian governments and their energy firms.

Minutes of a meeting with BP, Shell and BG (formerly British Gas) on 31 October 2002 read: "Baroness Symons agreed that it would be difficult to justify British companies losing out in Iraq in that way if the UK had itself been a conspicuous supporter of the US government throughout the crisis."

Not about Blood for Oil?

The website by Greg Muttitt, author of Fuel On Fire, reports what BP and public leaders said before the invasion:

* Foreign Office memorandum, 13 November 2002, following meeting with BP: "Iraq is the big oil prospect. BP are desperate to get in there and anxious that political deals should not deny them the opportunity to compete. The long-term potential is enormous..."

* Tony Blair, 6 February 2003: "Let me just deal with the oil thing because... the oil conspiracy theory is honestly one of the most absurd when you analyse it. The fact is that, if the oil that Iraq has were our concern, I mean we could probably cut a deal with Saddam tomorrow in relation to the oil. It's not the oil that is the issue, it is the weapons..."

* BP, 12 March 2003: "We have no strategic interest in Iraq. If whoever comes to power wants Western involvement post the war, if there is a war, all we have ever said is that it should be on a level playing field. We are certainly not pushing for involvement."

* Lord Browne, the then-BP chief executive, 12 March 2003: "It is not in my or BP's opinion, a war about oil. Iraq is an important producer, but it must decide what to do with its patrimony and oil."

* Shell, 12 March 2003, reported that it had discussed oil opportunities with Downing Street were 'highly inaccurate', adding: "We have neither sought nor attended meetings with officials in the UK Government on the subject of Iraq. The subject has only come up during conversations during normal meetings we attend from time to time with officials... We have never asked for 'contracts'."

Learn more: "Oil lies at the heart of Iraqi politics. Yet in the eight years since the bombs began to fall on Baghdad it has been a taboo subject. In Greg Muttitt’s gripping and far-reaching investigation we are taken behind the scenes of the occupation to answer one of the war’s most pressing questions: what is happening to Iraq’s oil?" (Fuel On Fire)

To become more empowered to help end the crime against humanity that the US and allies are committing in Iraq and other places, read "FUEL ON FIRE," and Thursday night, watch the "most inspiring and empowering film," FUEL, on CNBC at 10 PM Eastern Time.


Report this ad