Democrats lack the votes needed for an assault weapons ban

Government newsletter

Top Democrat and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid announced today that a proposed assault weapons ban won't be part of a gun control bill the Senate plans to take up next month because it does not have enough votes. The sponsor of the bill, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), said that she would have to make her proposal into an amendment rather than a stand-alone bill.

Related topics

Advertisement

"I very much regret it," Feinstein, (D-Calif.), told reporters of Reid's decision. "I tried my best."

Majority Leader Reid explained why the assault weapons bill would not be a stand-alone piece of legislation:

"I'm not going to try to put something on the floor that won't succeed. I want something that will succeed. I think the worst of all worlds would be to bring to something to the floor and it dies there," Reid said.

Senate Democrats drops assault weapon ban from gun bill WASHINGTON — Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has decided that a proposed assault weapons ban won't be part of a gun control bill the Senate plans to debate next month, the sponsor of the ban said Tuesday, a decision that means the ban stands little chance of survival. Instead, Sen. Dianne Feinstein said she will be able to offer her ban on the military-style firearms as an amendment. Feinstein is all but certain to need 60 votes from the 100-member Senate to prevail, but she faces solid Republican opposition and likely defections from some moderate Democrats. "I very much regret it," Feinstein, D-Calif., told reporters of Reid's decision. "I tried my best." Asked about the decision, Reid, D-Nev., said he wanted to bring a gun bill to the full Senate that would have enough support to overcome any GOP attempts to prevent debate from even starting. He said that "using the most optimistic numbers," there were less than 40 votes for Feinstein's ban. That is far less than the 60 votes needed to begin considering legislation, and an indication that Reid feared that including the assault weapons ban in the main guns bill would risk getting the votes needed to begin debate. "I'm not going to try to put something on the floor that won't succeed. I want something that will succeed. I think the worst of all worlds would be to bring to something to the floor and it dies there," Reid said. Feinstein, an author of the 1994 assault weapons ban that expired after a decade, said that Reid told her of the decision on Monday. There are 53 Democrats in the Senate, plus two independents who usually vote with them. An assault-type weapon was used in the December massacre at an elementary school in Newtown, Conn., that revived gun control as a top issue in Washington. Banning those firearms was among the proposals President Barack Obama made in January in response to those slayings. The assault weapons ban was the most controversial of the major proposals to restrict guns that have been advanced by Obama and Senate Democrats. Because of that, it had been expected that the assault weapons measure would be left out of the initial package the Senate considers, with Democrats hoping the Senate could therefore amass the strongest possible vote for the overall legislation. Having a separate vote on assault weapons might free moderate Democratic senators facing re-election next year in Republican-leaning states to vote against the assault weapons measure, but then support the remaining overall package of gun curbs. Gun control supporters consider a strong Senate vote important because the Republican-run House has shown little enthusiasm for most of Obama's proposals. Feinstein said Reid told her there will be two votes. One would be on her assault weapons ban, which also includes a ban on ammunition magazines that carry more than 10 rounds of ammunition. The second would just be on prohibiting the high-capacity magazine clips. Many Democrats think the ban on large-capacity magazines has a better chance of getting 60 votes than the assault weapons ban. The Senate Judiciary Committee has approved four gun control measures this month, including Feinstein's barring assault weapons and high capacity magazines. The others would expand required federal background checks for firearms buyers, increase federal penalties for illegal gun trafficking and boost school safety money.

Senator Feinstein has a history pushing for this type of legislation and infamously helped architect and shepherd through the 1994 assault weapons ban through the Senate as an amendment. When pressed back in January about what her response would be to this exact situation by CNN's Candy Crowley on State of the Union, Sen. Feinstein quickly responded that she would propose the assault weapon ban as an amendment to a larger piece of legislation.

Below are Senator Feinstein's exact words from that January 27 airing.

FEINSTEIN: Well, let me say this. This has always been an uphill fight. This has never been easy. This is the hardest of the hard.

Now, will it only be assault weapons? No, most likely. There will be a package put together. If assault weapons is left out of the package, and I'm a member of the judiciary, number two in seniority. I've been assured by the majority leader I will be able to do it as an amendment on the floor, which is the way I did it in 1993. So, that doesn't particularly bother me.

The announcement today from Harry Reid does not come as a surprise when considering this statement from Senator Feinstein made back in January.

Please subscribe, comment, and share.

Suggested by the author:
Advertisement

, Political Buzz Examiner

Jason Reagan is a freelance journalist and contributor of Examiner.com since 2010. Reagan studied business and government at the University of Tennessee and regularly contributes to MSNBC Newsvine and CNN. Reagan is a professional business writer and has an extensive background in government and...

Today's top buzz...