Skip to main content
Report this ad

See also:

Correcting THE VIEW's perspective of reality (& Obama's Press Conference)

Barbara Walters - The View
Barbara Walters - The View
Abbey-Roads, Blogspot, Public Domain

On November 12, 2013, this writer found himself accidently watching "The View". Within 15 minutes, this writer was enraged by some the the comments being made by Barbara Walters, Whoopi Goldberg & alleged Repubican Joe Scarsborough. This writer was so angered, he felt it prudent to wait at least a day to respond.


In the meantime, President Obama decided to give a press conference today, November 14,2013. Before we address correcting "The View's" perspective of reality, let us give appropriate time to President Obama's Press Conference. President Obama has admitted he lied about keeping your current insurance and your current Doctor.

At the same time, it is illegal for us rank and file Americans to make fraudulent misrepresentations to induce another to enter into a contract. Any contract which a rank and file Americans fraudulently induces another to sign is null and void and unenforceable. America's Foundation provides that "All People are created eaual". Another Foundation of America is the Principle of the "Rule of Law". Ergo, All People being created equal are to be ruled by the same set of laws and legal standard. Further, the Natural Law upon which this country is founded, provides that "Truth is established by the Individual using their own observations and reasoning". (Proof Country Founded on Natural Law )

The margin of passage of Obamacare was so narrow that Obama's admitted lies likely affected the outcome. Being fully informed, the overwhelming majority of Americans have established truth for themselves and and reject Obamacare. Ergo, in a nation predicated on "All People created equal" the just, honorable and only course of action is to rehash the debate with WE THE PEOPLE fully informed and recast the votes. But, alas, Obama is not only a liar, but he is a Progressive.

For those unaware, the philosophy of Progressive Government Doctrine is that masses do not know what is good for them and, therefore, the Progressive Educated Elite are authorized to lie to the masses to get them to do what the Progressive Educated Elite proclaim is in their best interests.(You just can't make this stuff up, research it yourself). With the forgoing introduction, all that is left to be said that President Obama is a liar. He subscribes to a Goverance Doctrine of Progressivism which specifically authorizes lying to the masses. To wit, at today's Press Conference President Obama just made some more misrepresentations and told some more lies to advance the Progressive Agenda. And further, telling WE THE PEOPLE we can keep our present original healthcare insurance for another year does not make the promise we could keep your health insurance "period" any less of a lie.

Finally, It just seems to this writer that before WE THE PEOPLE turn over 1/6 of the economy to the government, there should be an intellectually honest debate and vote to do so. Just call me crazy and unreasonable.(sarcasm) That having been said, even now, this writer feels he has devoted too many words to today's Obama Press Conference.


Which brings us to "The View". Ladies and Gentleman of November 12, 2013 program, today I will address you with respect as a fellow American, presuming you have the best interests of rank and file Americans at heart. This courtesy is only extended to you because at this point because this writer doesn't know whether representations and statements you made that offended this writer and fellow Americans were made as a result of lack of knowledge or
with intent to allign yourself against the best interests of WE THE PEOPLE. (President Obama recieved no such courtesy as he is full aware of his duplicitous agenda) This writer would ask you to "strike your colors" after reading this article so that this writer and WE THE PEOPLE may know whether you are freind or foe to the best interests of rank and file Americans. [On this episode of The View, Barbara Walters, Whoopi Goldberg, Sherri Shepherd and Jenny McCarthy were the cohosts and Joe Scarsborough ,alleged Republican and author of "The Right Play", was the guest)

That having been said, it angers this writer to the core to hear others assert what his or anyone else's alleged perspective of reality is. Barbara Walters barking "They need to stop talking about killing Obamacare"(at about 6m15s) and "they are obsessed with it"(at about 6m31s) . Joe Scarsborough says "They need to stop hating Obama" and Whoopi Golberg says "Yeah, Yeah". And the statement by Whoopi (at about 10m45s) that not everyone's opinion matters. There were many other offending statements and sentiments, but these featured statements capture the essense. The vitriol and arrogance with which they were delivered were as angering as the words themselves. And it further angered this writer that you would attempt to distort the democratic process by engaging in "Edward Bernays style Emotion based Propaganda" [,,,,,]This writer is sorry if the women of "TheView" are rattled that public opinion has turned against your friend President Obama and Obamacare, but that is the nature of lying, duplicity and poor performance.

Further, please explain how a less than 10% approval rating of Congress is summarized by the saying the Republican Party is suffering all time low ratings? Doesn't 10% or less approval essentially mean that Congressfolks immediate families, government employees and military folks under orders to do so, are the only ones who approve of the Congress? And doesn't this low approval of Congress also necessariyly mean the approval of Democrats is essentially as low as that of Repubicans? From this misrepresentation during this airing of "The View", it appears President Obama is not the only person who has a loose association with the truth.

Still further, this writer would not have known Joe Scarsborough was allegedly a Republican, if someone had not so identified him as such. At best he is a RINO. At worst, a Progressive. Or did Joe Scarsborough merely throw principle out the window for purposes of personal gain via the opportunity to schill for his book? (True patriots will hold Joe accountable, to say more this writer would just be "piling on")

And as a side note, Democrats have you not figured out that Republicans have not put out an alternative to Obamacare for a reason. The Republican Establishment want Obamacare themselves. However, the GOP establishment is welded to a party platform of the rank and file conservatives squarely against it. Obamacare is not abouth Healthcare, it is about control. Agenda 21 is not about the environment, it is about control. Gun Control is not about guns, it is about control.

Next, because of the manner "The View" and major media choose to frame the political debate, this writer is forced to respond in the context of the false Left/Right 2 major political party paradigm. This writer prefers to discuss issues in terms of Natural Law, the Constitution, the Bill of Rights and the Rule of Law. This writer will proceed with the premise that the women of "The View" are uninformed about the particulars of Natural Law, as are most Americans (by the deliberate design of Progressives and others who would be tyrants over the masses).

Next, this writer must establish that he does not speak for all conservatives. To be fair, some conservatives have been duped into accepting the Political Party elite conditioning to hate everything that is not part and parcel of the Republican Party. On the other hand, the major media, of which "The View" is a part, is as much as fault for creating the perspective of reality as the Elite of both major poltiical parties that promote it and the individuals who fail to establish truth for themselves and blindly follow party dogma. But there are certain principles and premises that are at the foundation of my perspective of reality that are shared by most Americans, and many of them lable themselves conservative.

"The natural liberty of man is to be free from any superior power on earth, and not to be under the will or legislative authority of man, but to have only the law of nature for his rule.

John Locke, The Second Treatise of Civil Government. 1690

Natural Law, upon which this country is founded, prescribes that the purpose of government is to give people more liberty than they would have in a natural state (pre-government). In summary, it is the nature of man to be free from submission to any higher earthly authority(free will). At the same time, in the natural state every individual must constantly guard their property and loved ones from the trespasses of others. Individuals agree to live according to a common set of laws and give government permission to use overwhelming power to enforce those laws to gain greater liberty than they would have in the natural state (pre-government)

"But though Amen when they enter into society, give up the equality, liberty and executive power they had in the state of nature, into the hands of the society, to be so far disposed of by the legislature, as the good of the society shall require; yet it being only with an intention to everyone the better to preserve himself his liberty and property"

John Locke, Second Treatise of Civil Government Chapter 9

"Their power, in the utmost bounds of it, is limited to the public good of the society. It is a power, that hath no other end but preservation, and therefore can never have a right to destroy, enslave, or designedly to impoverish the subjects".

John Locke, Second Treatise of Civil government, Chapter 11

And with this rudimentary foundation of Natural Law, upon which is the Foundation of our Country and Constitution predicated, we can begin to discuss that differences between Natural Law (aka Consent of the Governed) and Progressive Governance Doctrine. This writer submits that these differences are the true root of the percieved anger against anyonoe who would call themselves Progressive.

Natural Law and the Founders asserted that government must be created with the Nature of Humankind in mind.. (If the foundation of anything is not stable, everything built upon the flawed foundation is unstable and unworkable)

The Nature of Man in the Natural State pursuant to John Locke is:

"a social animal, with tendancies towards reason and tolerance, but who can be selfish".

Cato (also a favorite of the Founders) describe the issue as follows:

All [people] have free will and are not virtuous by Nature(

Therefore, the Founders knowing that all of us could be tempted to not be virtuous(selfish) created out government with the requirement of transparency and accountability, checks and balances.

Progressives, on the otherhand, describe the Nature of Mankind to be a social animal but altruistic by nature.

With great simplification, this leads Progressives to assert that Progressive Educated Elites can be trusted because they are altruistic by Nature. These Progressive Educated Elites are to be chosen from the wealthy, liesure class as only they have the time to study governance. Does this sound like the resurrection of a tyranny in America to anyone else?

This, as opposed to the position of Natural Law and the Founders:

"To understand political power right, and derive it from its original, we must consider, what state all men are naturally in, and that is, a state of perfect freedom to order their actions, and dispose of their possessions and persons, as they think fit, within the bounds of the law of nature, without asking leave, or depending upon the will of any other man."

John Locke, The Second Treatise of Civil Government. 1690

As is his preference and pursuant to Natural Law, this writer leaves it to the reader to determine truth for themselves. Which better describes the Nature of Man? Natural Law "with the ability to be selfish" or Progressives characterization as "altruistic". And with the readers selection as to the Nature of Man in the natural state having been made; What will be the result of a government created assuming to people to be altruistic when in fact they are not?

Is Progressive Politically Correct for Divine Right of Kings 2/3

Continuing: Progressivism defines Individuality, Creativity, Competition and Free Markets as evil. Progressives Identify them as evil asserting that they are the root cause of the exploitation of labor (the masses). Why do you have to hear this from this writer? Why is Natural Law, the foundatoin of this nation, not taught in the Public Schools? Why do not President Obama and the Progressives fully and freely make their positions clear? Again, it is consistent with the authority to lie to get the masses to do what the Progressive Educated Elites deem to be in the best interest of society. Progressives know the masses would revolt against them if they knew the truth about Progressive Governance Doctrine.

On the other hand, not only does Natural Law call for the individual to establish truth for themselves using there own reason and observation, it also commands self-determination of the individual. You make your own choices and accept the rewards and consequences of those choices. You young folks, are you willing to give up your individualism and creativity and submit to the whim of Progressive Educated Elites?

Natural Law: How WE THE PEOPLE got to the 4th of July, 1776

Why don't Progressives proudly proclaim that your Unalienable Rights will be subordinated to the best interests of the community as determined by the Progressive Educated Eltites selected from among the wealthy, liesure class once our Jeffersonian Constitution is replaced by the Progressive Constitution?

And finally, for those persons of color, may I suggest it is in your best interests to determine what role "Scientific Racism", Segregation and Eugenics plays in the formation of the Founding Philosophy of Progressives. Enough

A couple of more quick points, and then this writer will hasten to a conclusion.

Ladies of "The View", have you not considered the irony and injustice of our traditional healthcare system not being fixed because both Democrats and Repubicans were taking campaign contributions, bribes and other consideration from health insurance and medical companies to not fix it. Things like dropping people with claims, preexisting conditions and other injustices? Why do WE THE PEOPLE have to scrap the entire traditional healthcare system because Congress did not fix it in the best interests of WE THE PEOPLE and then add a safety net for those persons that wanted health insurance but could not afford it. If the ladies of "TheView" truly are embrace the best interests of rank and file Americans, doesn't this writer's proposal better address the issue (and Constittutionally) than Obamacare?

Ladies of "The View" if Progressives are right about the Nature of Man being Altruistic, please explain Congressional Insider Trading, the extortion schemes out lined in the recent book "Extortion" by Peter Schweizer, Congress folks taking bribes to not fix the existing healthcare, the Federal Reserve Bank and Fiat money?

If the ladies of "The View" really are committed in the best interests of rank and file Americans, why don't you have President Barrack Obama and Chief Supreme Court Justice John Roberts on your show? And thin ask them this: "Why are you exercising your Constitutional Power and Duty to act as a check and balance on Congress to prohibit Congressional Insider Trading?" Rightly so, Insider Trading is illegal for the rest of Americans. Pursuant to All People being Equal and the Rule of Law, Congress has no basis to permit itself to legally commit the crime of Insider Trading. this writer asserts, Obamacare and all these other scandals are just diversions from the rape, pillaging and plundering of rank and file America by Congress, SCOTUS and the Executive branch.

This writer does not hate Obama. The section of this article devoted to Obama's Press Conference makes it clear that this writer vehemently opposes persons who depart from simple common sense, fairness,the Constitution and the Country's Foundational Principles. This writer firmly opposes persons who waiver from principles such as "All People created equal", the Rule of Law, and the Natural Law tenant of Truth being determined by the individual. Do the loyalties of the women of "The View" lie more with PresidentObama than the Constitution, the Rule of Law and WE THE PEOPLE?

Further, this writer hates liars. Why don't the women of The View hate liars? This writer opposes persons that don't act in the best interests of WE THE PEOPLE. Why don't the women of The View not dislike and oppose anyone that alleges they have the best interests of rank and file American's heart and then duplicitously advances their alterior motives? This writer firmly opposes anyone who violates Natural Law and the Constitution. Why don't the women of The View firmly oppose anyone who violates Natural Law and the Constitution?

This writer does not hate Obamacare. This writer vehemently opposes any legislation that is passed with fraudulent representations? Why don't the women of The View vehemently oppose anyone who decieves the American General Public in order to pass legislation? Again, Progressive Governance Doctrine proclaims that anyone that does not agree with the decisions of the Progressive Educated Elite do so for 1 of 2 reasons: 1) They are too stupid to know what is good for them; 2) they are contaminated with evil thoughts such as Individuality, Creativity, Competition and Free Markets. Progressive Governance Doctrine provides that Government can deal with those who don't agree with the Progressive Educated Elites in a numbers of ways: re-education, conditioning, rewards, coersion, and punishment as examples. This writer hates and opposes any legislation promoted as being in the best interest of WE THE PEOPLE that will actually be used to coerce compliance with tyranny. Why don't the women of The View hate and oppose any legislation that will permit government to ignore and/or punish the voices of political dissent? Why don't the women of The View hate and oppose any legislation that will permit the government to deprive any citizen and/or their loved ones of necessary medical care as punishment/conditioning for voicing their political dissent?

With that, you ladies can longer can plead ingorance as the basis for your statements.

It is time now for you to strike your colors.

Do you deliberately mislead rank and file Americans because you did not realize the true nature of political debate or because you side with the proposed Progressive tyranny and are willing to trade the liberty of the masses for your personal gain?

America awaits your answer.

If you strike your colors as being for the proposed Progressive tyranny, this writer's gloves come off the next time he addresses you.

As for this writer:

"I will always be more loyal to Natural Law, the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the Rule of Law & WE THE PEOPLE than I am to any political party!"

Don Mashak, The Cynical Patriot

Upon being so advised, this writer asks, do you find me freind or foe?

Please wake up America.

Those were my thoughts.

In Closing:

Thank you, my fellow citizens, for taking your valuable time to read and reflect upon what is written here.

If what is written here rings true to you, perhaps you should contact your local elected officials and let them know. If you are afraid of repercussions, snail mail it anonymously and ask them to respond in the local paper or their own monthly/quarterly internet newsletter. Even if this article refers to something outside you geographic area, it still likely applies to your location. Remember all those taxpayer training junkets we taxpayers send the bureaucrats on? They all learn the same “livestock management” techniques to use on WE THE PEOPLE.

And that leaves WE THE PEOPLE with this conundrum: While our #Government works full time with compensation and funded with our money for the cause of #Tyranny; WE THE PEOPLE are forced to work part time without compensation for the cause of #liberty with what is left over of our time, money and energy.

Finally, this article is written with the same intentions as Thomas Paine I seek no leadership role. I seek only to help the American People find their own way using their own “Common Sense”

Keep Fighting the Good Fight!

In Liberty, Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
Don Mashak Google Plus


End the Fed(eral Reserve Bank System) #ETF
National Minneapolis

Bring Home the Politicians #BHTP

Lawless America #LawlessAmerica

Term Limits #TermLimit

Justice in Minnesota #JIM

Critical Thinking Notice - This author advises you as no politician would dare. Exercise Critical Thinking ( in determining the truthfulness of anything you read or hear. Do not passively accept nor believe anything anyone tells you, including this author... unless and until you verify it yourself with sources you trust and could actively defend your perspective to anyone who might debate you to the contrary of your perspective.

Report this ad