WASHINGTON, D.C. – Financial regulations imposed after the 2008 Wall Street crash are backfiring on consumers and pose a “compliance nightmare” for lenders.
“What we have are policymakers on steroids,” U.S. Rep. Scott Garrett charged Tuesday.
“They have contempt for the public,” said the New Jersey Republican, who complained that the Federal Reserve Board has yet to provide an unredacted report of events leading up to the financial meltdown six years ago.
Lawyers from four federal agencies defended their actions, asserting that banks have bounced back under their watch and Dodd-Frank financial reforms.
“Dodd-Frank is designed to strengthen the mortgage market. We’re acting to reduce regulatory burdens,” said Meredith Fuchs, general counsel for the 3-year-old Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Jeb Hensarling, chairman of the House Committee on Financial Services, countered that just the opposite is happening.
“There’s a ‘gotcha attitude,’” the Texas Republican said. “It’s led to a downsizing of consumer lending programs.”
Liberal Democratic Rep. Keith Ellison agreed.
“The regulatory regime has swung too far. It’s closing off good people trying to do legitimate transactions,” the Minnesotan said.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. reported that since Dodd-Frank was enacted, fewer U.S. banks offer free checking accounts, while customer fees rise. Credit card companies, meantime, are shutting down more accounts and lowering credit lines.
Yet Republican efforts to require the Congressional Budget Office to conduct cost-benefit analyses of new federal regulations were mocked by Rep. Maxine Waters.
“Excessive borrowing and risky investments were the problem (in 2008) – not federal regulators,” said the California Democrat.
Hensarling accused federal agencies under Dodd-Frank of “engaging in de facto rulemaking without a rulemaking process.”
He charged CFPB with “abusive practices,” citing alleged targeting of third-party (payday) lenders, as well as discrimination complaints by some of its own employees.
“You’re imposing a standard for others that you are incapable of living under yourself,” he told Fuchs.
Barred from a CFPB meeting this year, Rep. Sean Duffy, R-Wis., called the agency “as secret as the CIA.”
“These meetings should be open and transparent,” he said.
Paul Gallagher, on the economic staff of Executive Intelligence Review, told Examiner that Dodd-Frank is “riddled with loopholes” that pose a grave, but little-known, threat to U.S. consumers.
“Banks are disappearing. They are being obstructed. Regulators have nothing to claim credit for,” he said.
“The problem today is lack of bank credit in economy. $3.4 trillion in money was printed in the last 5 ½ year, but total lending has decreased by $320 billion. I blame this on Dodd-Frank and the Fed.”
Gallagher points to Section II of Dodd-Frank, which he says authorizes the confiscation of bonds of unsecured creditors and the seizure of uninsured deposits – as has occurred in Cyprus and Spain.
“This ‘bail-in’ will make the bailout look orderly by comparison,” he warned.
And disputing the regulators’ claim of a rejuvenated banking system, Gallagher reported, “The rate at which U.S. banks are disappearing is high and accelerating” through acquisitions.
“We’ve seen the number of banks decline from 8,200 to 6,900” in less than a decade, as larger financial institutions get even bigger.
To automatically receive my articles for FREE, click the "Subscribe" icon next to my picture atop this page; each dispatch will be sent directly to your email account.