Skip to main content
  1. News
  2. Crime & Courts

Colorado Courts 2013 Year in Review

See also

A year-end restrospective on an impactful 2013 in Colorado courts

Another tumultuous year has come and gone for the Colorado judiciary - and although Colorado Citizens and taxpayers have again been hammered by the gavels of Colorado judges pounding their personal preferences over the will of the people - and the rule of law - this last year has also seen some striking victories in the Colorado Courts.

Some cases from previous years continue to impact events and conditions in the state, and others continue to slog their way through the courts (the wheels of justice can turn slowly).

After the Colorado courts decided the boundaries for Congressional districts (once the state senate reprised the 2000 playbook of abdicating responsibility to send it to the courts) and state legislative districts (when the Colorado Supreme Court approved the legislative maps drawn by the Colorado Reapportionment Commission in 2011), Colorado's electoral destiny in 2012 was almost a foregone conclusion.

Colorado Courts (specifically, Denver District Court Judge Michael Martinez) rejected a constitutional challenge to the ‘FASTER’ Colorado Car Tax (on the basis of violations of Article X, Section 20 – Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights, TABOR) although that ruling is being appealed (and Judge Martinez is among the most-overturned judges on the Denver District Court).

Ironically, the Colorado Supreme Court and Court of Appeals started 2013 by moving into the palatial new 'Colorado Judicial Center' (at significant taxpayer expense and incurring massive new "non-debt" debt) in violation of the TABOR requirement to seek voter approval before incurring debt - a monument to an imperial, unaccountable state judiciary.

On the positive side, 2013 saw some tremendously impactful rulings in Colorado courts:

Three years ago, the outcomes of those cases would have been different. Three years ago, thanks to your help, Colorado citizens sent a loud and clear message to the judiciary: rule based on the constitution and the law, not political whims. That’s all we want. Oh, and BTW: we’re watching.

Advertisement

News

  • Mt. Everest avalanche
    Disaster strikes Mt. Everest as at least 12 people were killed in an avalanche
    Video
    Watch Video
  • Most Earthlike planet discovered
    The Kepler telescope has discovered the most Earthlike, possibly habitable planet yet
    Space News
  • Easter crosses create debate
    Easter crosses spark a debate of separation of church and state in Ohio
    Headlines
  • Chelsea Clinton is preggers
    Former first daughter Chelsea Clinton is pregnant with her first child
    Headlines
  • Stanley Cup playoffs
    The battle for Lord Stanley's Cup is on, don't miss a minute of playoff action
    Sports
  • Ukraine discussed amongst U.S., E.U., Russia
    The U.S., E.U. and Russia agree on ways to diffuse the tension in Ukraine
    Video
    Watch Video

User login

Log in
Sign in with your email and password. Or reset your password.
Write for us
Interested in becoming an Examiner and sharing your experience and passion? We're always looking for quality writers. Find out more about Examiner.com and apply today!