College Football: Pac 10 vs. Big Ten Breakdown

One of the major topics of discussion at the Big Ten Media Days was regarding how the Big Ten stacks up against the other conferences in college football. It seems pretty clear that the SEC and the Big 12 are in a tier of their own right now, while the Pac 10 and ACC claim that they have an edge over the "struggling" Big Ten.

There is no doubt that the Big Ten has taken a step back in the past few years, but too much is being made of the Big Ten's struggles in the postseason. Several college football experts, including my favorite blogger Adam Rittenberg, have put the Pac-10 in front of the Big Ten. But as the great Lee Corso would say, "Not so fast my friend!"

When one thinks of the Pac-10, the juggernaut that is USC comes to mind. The powerhouse program has been dominant on the college scene for over a decade, but the depth of the Big Ten right now gives it an edge over its West Coast counterparts.

Let's take a look at the rankings. Here are the general consensus rankings for the Big Ten:

 


1. Ohio State
2. Penn State
3. Iowa
4. Michigan State
5. Illinois
6. Wisconsin
7. Minnesota
8. Northwestern
9. Michigan
10. Purdue
11. Indiana

 

And here is the Pac 10: 


1. USC
2. California
3. Oregon
4. Oregon State
5. Arizona St.
6. Stanford
7. UCLA
8. Arizona
9. Washington
10. Washington St.

 

I'll be the first to admit that preseason rankings don't mean much and that these are definitely up for debate. But for the sake of comparing the conferences and examining head to head matchups, we'll stick with these.

Obviously the Big Ten has one more team, which one could say adds to the argument regarding depth, but we'll compare the conferences in two ways - first by taking the Big Ten's weakest team out of the equation (Indiana) and also by taking the Big Ten's median team (Wisconsin) out.

If we take the weakest team - Indiana- out, here's how the head-to-head looks like, with the favored team in each matchup in bold. 


Ohio State USC
Penn State California
Iowa Oregon
Michigan State Oregon State
Illinois Arizona St.
Wisconsin Stanford
Minnesota UCLA
Northwestern Arizona
Michigan Washington
Purdue Washington St.

 

The Pac-10 takes 3 out of the 4 top matchups, but the Big Ten takes 7 overall, including the final 6. Some may only want to point to the top teams when comparing conferences, but consider this: the top games will be closer than the bottom games.

In the USA Today Coaches Poll, USC is ranked No. 4 while OSU is No. 6. In the Rivals college football rankings (which I have more respect for than the Coaches Poll), Penn State is placed No. 12 and California is at No. 13, while Oregon is at No. 17 and Iowa is at No. 18. Oregon State (No. 26) and Michigan State (No. 31) are only seperated by five spots.

Illinois (No. 35) and Arizona State (No. 45) are 10 spots away from each other, while Michigan (No. 46), Wisconsin (No. 49), and Minnesota (No. 51) are all ranked higher than the Pac-10's next best team - Stanford (No. 54).

This may be skewed a bit since these are all just the opinions of Rivals.com, but there is no denying the difference in depth between the Pac-10 and the Big Ten. Washington and Washington St. are worse than any team in the Big Ten, and while the Pac-10 had more teams ranked in the Coaches Poll (4) than the Big Ten (3), the Big Ten also had six teams receive votes (Michigan State, Illinois, Wisconsin, Northwestern, Michigan, Minnesota), while the Pac-10 had just two (UCLA, Arizona).

Of course, polls are just polls, but let's take the a look at the head-to-head matchups if we take out the Big Ten's median team (Wisconsin). 


Ohio State USC
Penn State California
Iowa Oregon
Michigan State Oregon State
Illinois Arizona St.
Minnesota Stanford
Northwestern UCLA
Michigan Arizona
Purdue Washington
Indiana Washington St.

 

Even if Wisconsin is taken out, the results don't change, showing the strength of the Big Ten's depth. Of course, having better "weaker" teams than another conference may be like saying you're the thinnest kid at fat camp, but this still is worthy of being considered. There isn't too much disparity amongst the top teams, although a slight nod should be given to the Pac-10, but the Big Ten's much stronger depth should make it the stronger conference.

And even when comparing bowls, it should be noted that the Big Ten is consistently represented by two schools in the BCS, while Pac-10 usually only has one - USC.

And there is no question that the Big Ten's depth can - and will - get better. The Michigan of today is immeasurably worse than the Michigan of yesterday, while Rich Rodriguez's recruiting and new system may have the Wolverines back on top of the collegiate rankings very soon. On top of bringing Michigan back as a powerhouse program, the Big Ten also has Illinois, Iowa, Michigan State, Minnesota, and Wisconsin close to becoming consistently successful programs.

So not so fast my friends, the Pac-10 takes a backseat to the Big Ten, and it better get comfortable.

Advertisement

, Illinois Fighting Illini Examiner

Currently an undergraduate student at the University of Illinois, Jay works as a sports writer for the Daily Illini, an independent student newspaper. He is also branching out into freelance writing and photojournalism. Contact Jay.

Comments

  • Ben 3 years ago

    Haha I liked the analogy of fat camp - which is somewhat true. Until the Big Ten gets the top tier teams to compete and dominate, questions about its strength will be questioned. Although I even think Purdue and Indiana can get better soon.

  • CF 3 years ago

    I don't understand where this Pac-10 mania is coming from. Just because USC romps over whoever it plays in the Rose Bowl but still loses games to Oregon State doesn't mean the Pac10 is better than the Big Ten

  • Kunal 3 years ago

    "On top of bringing Michigan back as a powerhouse program, the Big Ten also has Illinois, Iowa, Michigan State, Minnesota, and Wisconsin close to becoming consistently successful programs."

    You forgot Northwestern.

  • Dmoney 3 years ago

    Your assesment is remedial at best. The Big 10 is AWFUL and there's no chance they win a game from the Pac 10. Iowa got lucky, since Nick Foles of Arz. didn't get the start until the second half of that game. The BIG 10 is the worst conference in the BCS system, while the Pac 10 is EASILY The second strongest top to bottom conference behind the SEC. Pull your head out of your asses and wake up. THE BIG 10 SUCKS!

  • chair 3 years ago

    Wow this is old, looks like a lot has changed. Oregon, Oregon State, Stanford, USC, and Cal would beat Ohio St, Iowa, Wisconsin, Northwestern, and Michigan State in that order. PAC 10 number 2 Arizona would probably lose to Big 10 number 2 Penn state. The rest are up in the air since I don't care to look. PAC 10 would own Big 10 no problem

  • Joe 3 years ago

    You're an idiot Jay Lee...Pac 10 owns the Big Ten.

Add a new comment

Join the conversation! Log in here or create a new account if you've never registered before.

Got something to say?

Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!

Today's top buzz...