According to the CDC rates of circumcision performed on newborn males in the U.S. declined sharply from 56 percent in 2006 to just 33 percent in 2009. The decision to circumcise a newborn so that he will fit in with peers in the locker room is no longer valid.
Circumcision in the U.S. has been a controversial and hot button topic for years. Circumcision rates in 1970 were almost 90 percent. The credit for this incredible decline might be due to the ever increasing number of parents who are educating themselves about this unnecessary cosmetic procedure before making a choice.
No national health organization in the world recommends circumcision for healthy male infants, not the American Academy of Pediatrics or the American Medical Association. Nearly all European males are intact, with no epidemic of penile health problems, thus discrediting the American held believe that circumcision is healthy.
Another myth is that circumcision removes just a little flap of skin. The truth is that roughly 15 square inches of tissue is removed, amounting to anywhere from one-third to one-half of the skin covering a normal penis. Removed with this tissue are 240 feet of nerves and up to 20,000 nerve endings.
Activists spreading the word about circumcision call themselves intactivists. Their argument is that an intact penis is the default and natural condition. Don’t fix it if it ain’t broken. Risks and side effects can include hemorrhage and even death. The foreskin that is removed actually has a function.
Another argument against routine newborn circumcision is consent. An infant can’t give it. It’s his body; he should make the decision when he’s older. Some circumcised men have even opted for foreskin restoration.
Many organizations have come out against routine infant circumcision. Just a few of which are: Doctors Opposing Circumcision, Mothers Against Circumcision and even Jews Against Circumcision.
More information can be found at cicumcision.org, cirp and nocirc.
Comments
Great Article!!!
Awesome article. Our son is intact. He's never had any issues. We are so glad that America is finally waking up to this "bad fad" and leaving boys a choice over their own genital integrity.
I was circumcised at birth. I dislike being cut so much that I am restoring my foreskin to undo some of the damage of my circumcision. It takes time and effort. I am amazed at how much having a foreskin improves things. It is a shame that my parents did not protect me when I was born and let them cut off part of my sex organ.
Great article. I have written an article about this controversial issue myself. Both of my boys are still intact and I continue to remain on that side of the fence.
My two youngest boys are intact and the only reason my oldest isn't is because I was not educated enough to truly make an informed decision. I try to put the information out there so that others will have the information. Thanks for all the responses!
Got something to say?
Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!