A U.S. soldier imprisoned for leaking classified information to WikiLeaks broke her silence in a hot editorial accusing the United States of lying about Iraq.
Chelsea Manning was sentenced to 35 years in prison in 2013 for leaking 750,000 pages of classified documents to the anti-secrecy group.
When she first came out, Manning used her first name Bradley, and then later announced the desire to live as a woman and be known as Chelsea Manning.
Apparently, Manning stayed out of the limelight since the conviction, which spared the former intelligence analyst to a most serious charge of aiding the enemy.
However, she was back, Saturday, with an opinion piece titled “The Fog Machine of War” in The New York Times. The content that she accuses the U.S. media of looking the other way when chaos and corruption reigned in Iraq and Afghanistan.
“As Iraq erupts in civil war, and America again contemplates intervention, that unfinished business should give new urgency to the question of how the United States military controlled the media coverage of its long involvement there and in Afghanistan,” Manning wrote.
“I believe that the current limits on press freedom and excessive government secrecy make it impossible for Americans to grasp fully what is happening in the wars we finance.”
“You might remember that the American press was flooded with stories declaring the elections a success, complete with upbeat anecdotes and photographs of Iraqi women proudly displaying their ink-stained fingers,” she wrote. “The subtext was that United States military operations had succeeded in creating a stable and democratic Iraq. Those of us stationed there were acutely aware of a more complicated reality.”
She said at the time, she got regular reports detailing security forces’ crackdown against dissidents “on behalf” of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki.
“I was shocked by our military’s complicity in the corruption of that election,” she said. “Yet these deeply troubling details flew under the American media’s radar.”
Sunni militant fighters are vowing to capture cities in Iraq and threatening the government of al-Maliki. Some Iraqi security forces, most of whom were trained by the United States, have left their posts in areas overrun by militants.
U.S. President Barack Obama has said he will not send troops to Iraq, but is considering other options.
“This is not going to happen overnight,” the President said Friday. He added that unless Iraq fixes its internal political problems, short-term military help from the United States won’t make much difference.
Consequently, pressure for the United States to provided military support to Iraq’s dwindling government has increased, with conservative Republicans blaming Obama for creating a security vacuum in 2011 by pulling out U.S. troops.
GOP critics added that Obama’s unwillingness to provide military backing to opposition forces in Syria’s civil war mean that would be easier for the militant Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, or ISIS, to attack in Iraq.
Obama, however, has resisted getting drawn into another military engagement there after the ending the nine-year conflict started by his predecessor.
Manning also slammed the practice of embedding journalists with the military.
“Reporters naturally fear having their access terminated, so they tend to avoid controversial reporting that could raise red flags,” Manning wrote.