Skip to main content
  1. News
  2. Politics
  3. Policy & Issues

Capital punishment is far more expensive than life without parole

See also

California's Proposition 34 aims to replace the state's death penalty with a sentence of life imprisonment without possibility of parole (LWOP).

Those California voters who are unmoved by moral, ethical, rational, empirical or constitutional arguments against capital punishment should at least consider the financial implications of the death penalty for California taxpayers in this difficult economy.

Contrary to what many people believe, imposing capital punishment is actually much more costly than imposing a life sentence.

A 2008 study found that, because of the expenses required to implement the death penalty--including pre-trial and trial costs, automatic appeals, state and federal Habeas Corpus petitions, and special incarceration outlays--California spends approximately $90,000 per year per inmate over and above what LWOP would cost.

As a result, a 2011 financial assessment concludes, capital punishment has cost the state of California over $4 billion since 1978.

Since only thirteen executions have actually been carried out during the past thirty-four years, that amounts to approximately $308 million per execution.

The authors of the 2011 study calculate that commuting all remaining California death row inmates' sentences to life in prison would achieve an immediate savings of $170 million to the state per year, eventually saving California taxpayers $5 billion over the next twenty years.

That's $5 billion that could be spent on, say, solving more crimes, improving California schools and infrastructure, hiring more firefighters, combating climate change, and tackling our budget deficit.

Given the exorbitant costs of capital punishment, and given that the vast majority of death row inmates will die of old age or other natural causes long before their mandatory appeals are exhausted anyway, how can we afford not to redirect our state resources toward programs that will actually help Californians?

In the name of fiscal responsibility, if for no other reason, Californians should approve Prop. 34 on November 6.

Comments

Advertisement

News

  • Mt. Everest avalanche
    Disaster strikes Mt. Everest as at least 12 people were killed in an avalanche
    Video
    Watch Video
  • Most Earthlike planet discovered
    The Kepler telescope has discovered the most Earthlike, possibly habitable planet yet
    Space News
  • Easter crosses create debate
    Easter crosses spark a debate of separation of church and state in Ohio
    Headlines
  • Chelsea Clinton is preggers
    Former first daughter Chelsea Clinton is pregnant with her first child
    Headlines
  • Stanley Cup playoffs
    The battle for Lord Stanley's Cup is on, don't miss a minute of playoff action
    Sports
  • Ukraine discussed amongst U.S., E.U., Russia
    The U.S., E.U. and Russia agree on ways to diffuse the tension in Ukraine
    Video
    Watch Video

User login

Log in
Sign in with your email and password. Or reset your password.
Write for us
Interested in becoming an Examiner and sharing your experience and passion? We're always looking for quality writers. Find out more about Examiner.com and apply today!