President Barack Obama isn't the only person that has a strong opinion about the nickname of the Washington Redskins. During halftime of the game between the Redskins and Dallas Cowboys on Sunday, Oct. 14, 2013, longtime NBC announcer Bob Costas ripped on the name and even went as far as to call it "an insult, a slur."
During halftime of the game, Costas sat there and made sure to choose his words carefully so as not to openly criticize Redskins owner Daniel Snyder, but he didn't mince words. Snyder continues to say that the name will not change.
Many people believe that the name of the team should be changed due to the offensive nature of it, and how Native Americans feel about it. As Costas made sure to point out, "in fact, as best can be determined, even a majority of Native Americans say they are not offended."
Still, that didn't stop him from continuing on.
Bob Costas lets it be known that a number of colleges have changed their nicknames due to objections and they appear fine with it. Costas cannot figure out why a professional team can't change its ways and do its part to help stop offending people.
Below is a full transcript of Bob Costas' halftime speech on the Washington Redskins:
"With Washington playing Dallas here tonight, it seems like an appropriate time to acknowledge the ongoing controversy about the name “Redskins.”
"Let’s start here. There is no reason to believe that owner Daniel Snyder, or any official or player from his team, harbors animus toward Native Americans or wishes to disrespect them. This is undoubtedly also true of the vast majority of those who don’t think twice about the longstanding moniker. And in fact, as best can be determined, even a majority of Native Americans say they are not offended.
"But, having stipulated that, there’s still a distinction to be made. Objections to names like 'Braves,' 'Chiefs,' 'Warriors,' and the like strike many of us as political correctness run amok. These nicknames honor, rather than demean. They are pretty much the same as 'Vikings,' 'Patriots,' or even 'Cowboys.' And names like 'Blackhawks,' 'Seminoles,' and 'Chippewas,' while potentially more problematic, can still be OK provided the symbols are appropriately respectful – which is where the Cleveland Indians with the combination of their name and “Chief Wahoo” logo have sometimes run into trouble.
"A number of teams, mostly in the college ranks, have changed their names in response to objections. The Stanford Cardinal and the Dartmouth Big Green were each once the Indians; the St. John’s Redmen have become the Red Storm, and the Miami of Ohio Redskins – that’s right, Redskins – are now the Red Hawks.
"Still, the NFL franchise that represents the nation’s capital has maintained its name. But think for a moment about the term “Redskins,” and how it truly differs from all the others. Ask yourself what the equivalent would be, if directed toward African-Americans, Hispanics, Asians, or members of any other ethnic group.
"When considered that way, 'Redskins' can’t possibly honor a heritage, or noble character trait, nor can it possibly be considered a neutral term. It’s an insult, a slur, no matter how benign the present-day intent. It is fair to say that for a long time now, and certainly in 2013, no offense has been intended. But, if you take a step back, isn’t it clear to see how offense might legitimately be taken?"