Skip to main content
  1. News
  2. Politics
  3. Republican

Black robed scoundrels allow bans on high capacity gun mags

See also

The black robed scoundrels of the U.S. Supreme Court have struck again. Justice Anthony Kennedy, who handles Supreme Court emergency appeals for California and eight other western states, refused to block the enforcement of new gun control laws in California that would ban standard sized magazines, according to SFGate today.

This means that towns and cities in California can proceed with the enforcement of the new law that will prevent citizens from using magazines that carry more than 10 "rounds" or bullets. Sunnyvale is one of the towns in question, along with San Francisco.

Sunnyvale held a referendum in November of 2013 during which 66 percent of voters approved the magazine ban.

But as SFGate reported,

A group of gun owners sued to overturn the Sunnyvale ordinance and asked a federal judge to block its enforcement, arguing that tens of millions of Americans legally own guns with high-capacity magazines and may sometimes need them to repel criminal attacks.

Their request was rejected.

San Francisco is next on the agenda as the courts have ruled in favor of its new law designed to do the same thing as Sunnyvale's:

San Francisco's ordinance, approved by the Board of Supervisors and signed by Mayor Ed Lee in November, is scheduled to take effect April 7. Other gun owners and a group of retired police officers, also represented by Michel and his firm, sued to overturn the ordinance but were denied an injunction Feb. 23 by another federal judge, William Alsup.

They have also appealed to the Ninth Circuit and would need an order from that court, or from the Supreme Court, to block enforcement. The prospect of any such order was apparently eliminated by the high court's rebuff of the Sunnyvale plaintiffs Wednesday.

The actions of citizens and the courts in these matters raise yet again the issue of whether or not a "majority vote" can negate the rights and liberties protected by the Constitution. The Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution by the Framers precisely in order to protect certain enumerated rights from a majority vote of citizens or an intrusion of the courts or any other government entity that would encroach upon those rights.

Thus, in the purest sense and in the view of the Framers, such laws as the ones approved by Sunnyvale and San Francisco are illegal and therefore carry absolutely no mandate that citizens obey.

THE LATEST.

My latest entry is now available at my blog at The Liberty Sphere under the section, "Musings After Midnight." It is titled, "The latest news from the underground patriot movement, including warnings of more gov't harassment of conservatives, libertarians, and gun owners."

NOTICE.

Read one of my most popular entries on my blog in the popular series, Musings After Midnight, titled, "The Stealth War."

My series "Musings After Midnight" is now indexed at my blog, The Liberty Sphere.

You may also wish to visit my ministry site at Martin Christian Ministries.

Advertisement

News

  • Gaza conflict
    Israel official: Ceasefire and expanding Gaza conflict are both being discussed
    Video
    Video
  • Air Algerie crash
    Conflicting reports about the Air Algerie disappearance begin to emerge
    Top News
  • Arizona execution
    A Senator familiar with torture denounces Joseph Wood's botched execution as such
    US News
  • Ray Rice suspended
    Ravens' running back Ray Rice is suspended for two games for a domestic violence arrest
    Sports
  • Amazon tribe falls ill
    An Amazonian tribe catches influenza after making first contact with the developed world
    Headlines
  • CIA prison in Poland
    Poland is declared guilty of human rights violations for hosting a secret CIA prison
    Video
    Video