Top UN scientists have been forced to admit that natural weather occurrences are having a far greater effect on climate change than CO2 emissions as a continued cooling trend means there has been no global warming since 1998. But despite overwhelming signs of global cooling - China's coldest winter for 100 years and record snow levels across Northeast America - allied with temperature records showing a decline - global warming advocates still cling to the notion that the world is cooling because of global warming! Caption Credit: PrisonPlanet.com Image Credit: blahblahblog
Anthropogenic Global Warming Scientists, the new “Flat Earth” society? (Video Link Added)
Last week, a hacker revealed that a group of powerful, government-backed European scientists are controlling the results of developing global warming theory, and preventing clear debate or the development of opposing scientific evidence to AGW (Anthropogenic Global Warming). It appears that certain more objective scientists run the risk --- if they present solid evidence contrary to the popular global warming theories --- realize they run the risk of being made objects of ridicule and marginalized in efforts to gain monies from Governments for research projects designed to discover facts ... that lead to the truth.
So on one side we have the “flat earther” powerful old-world scientists … and on the other side we have the “world is round” scientific-method based researchers who are continuing to discover facts … and thereby, the truth.
Powerful forces within the scientific community have been purposely shaping information in order to bolster a concept that, at best, is speculative and seems designed to lead to one human activity that these people think is perfectly suitable for their point-of-view ... a one-world Government, based upon a socialist model of CONTROL. This CONTROL is initially focusing on calling us to “Save the Earth From Destruction”, since a fear-based program is the only way to get free people to forsake their rights and their freedoms in the concept of climate stabilization and saving humanity from imminent destruction.
South Park's depiction of Al Gore giving a lecture that will give him greater riches through the selling of "Carbon Credits" based upon a flat Earth, AGW paradigm. Image Credit: Malagent
This excerpted and edited National Review Online –
Krauthammer's Take
On the announcement that President Obama will attend the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen
NRO Staff, Friday, November 27, 2009
Comments From Wednesday's Fox News All-Star Panel:
The global warming science is not junk science, but it's speculative. It's based on incomplete data. It's based on computer models that rest on assumptions — that, in turn, rest on an understanding of how the globe’s climate controls itself — that [are] extremely incomplete.
So its projections are speculative. But it pretends that, of course, that it is the hardest of all sciences and anybody who is skeptical is a denier — using a term used normally about the Holocaust, which is of course an event that actually happened as opposed to projections in global warming, which are speculative science.
So what you see in the [leaked global-warming] emails are people that are on somewhat shaky grounds. It is not as if there is no science at all in this, but there is contradictory evidence, such as the flattening of the rise in temperatures, which they cannot explain.
And their response is either suppression or manipulation or, even worse, the delegitimizing of — the personal attacks on — skeptics in an attempt to write them out of the journals, to get them fired, and all kinds of nasty stuff. … It puts a lot of their research in question.
I think what's interesting about Obama is he is going to be at the U.N. [conference in Copenhagen] to announce the [new] policy about climate change on the basis of — nothing. He is going to be proposing what the House has passed — that he knows is not going to pass in the Senate.
And we are actually a constitutional democracy where the president can't announce a policy unilaterally. It actually has to pass the two houses of the Congress, and our allies abroad know that, and they’re going to look at this announcement he is going to make and think it … extremely strange.
Reference Here>>
The United States has established no formal policy, yet our President, if allowed to do so, will gladly sign away our sovereignty in order to achieve the socialist political objectives of control found in the Copenhagen accords.
Further, scientists and Government forces who choose to use or believe in their conclusions that the Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) is a fact, are no better than previous generations of leaders in their insistence that the Earth is flat. These people should be known from this moment forward as ... "Flat-Earthers"!
From The Free Dictionary:
1) flat-earth·er (flatûrther)
n.
One who stubbornly adheres to outmoded or discredited ideas: "If you don't accept the ideas derived from Adam Smith ... then you are [considered] a flat-earther" (James Fallows).
[From the long-discredited belief that the earth is flat.]
2) flat-earther
Comments
Holdren is mentioned in Climategate emails. Browner is involved with a carbon trading company. Al Gore may be the least of our worries.
There is no proof either way. But if we believe our eyes or our lungs, we should be able to understand that co2 emmisions are bad, for us!! Not only climate change!! So why don't people argue that brething really isn't that important, we can handle another 100 years of pooring pollution into the atmosphere, and forcing the everyone else around the world to breath it.. Sounds fair to me! Quit worrying about how much money we can make off oil and try to do something good for the rest of us!
The AGW criminal criminal conspiracy exactly represents a treason against human beings. How many people in poverty stricken countries have died of starvation as a result of their high crimes?
They should be prosecuted in front of the entire world for CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY!!!
No mercy!!!
Thank you, Edmund, for reporting this important story. The CO2 hypothesis causing global warming is falsified by existing data of increased global temperatures since 1998, earth's history of warmer periods without human-caused CO2 such as the Medieval Warm Period, sun activity correlate to all our solar system's planets' surface temperatures, and increased polar ice since 2007.
And those e-mails show lying in all possible ways!
For those interested in more, I've given this topic my best shot also. I do hope South Park is inspired to hit this idea again.
Actually, climategate has been debunked, why is this article even online still?
The actual hacked climate model source code explained by a software developer:
fascistsoup.com/2009/11/25/more-on-the-climategate-source-code/
This is better than the emails, trust me.
To John - The Scientific Method, which every kid learns in school, is the basis of science. You get the results you get, not the ones you want.
NONE of the predictions laid out in an Inconvenient Truth have even begun to be realized and CO2 is ... Plant Food!
Shaping the data to make a case is FRAUD, plain and simple. If you want to sign on to a fraudulent hypothesis, this says more about you, than it does the "science” from which it is derived.
There is no global cooling. See my Global Cooling page at:
www2.sunysuffolk.edu/mandias/global_warming/global_cooling.html
and educate yourself about this myth. 19 of the warmest years on record have occurred in the past 25 years. The warmest years globally have been 1998 and 2005 with the years 2002, 2007, and 2003 close behind. The warmest decade has been the last ten years and the warming has been widespread globally.
Skeptics and conspiracy buffs need to understand that even without any CRU data nor the publications of it scientists, there are MULTIPLE lines of evidence for AGW:
1) UAH, RSS, and GISS show warming
2) Rapidly warming Arctic
3) Rapidly decreasing sea ice extent
4) Rapidly thinning sea ice
5) Rising ocean heat content
6) Cooling stratosphere
7) Net increase in downwelling LW
8 ) Net decreasing TOA LW emission
9) Increased species migrations/extinctions
10) Increased severe weather occurrences
11) Glacier mass loss and retreats increasing
12) Rising sea levels
13) Most importantly: rapidly rising human emissions of GHGs that have not been seen in millions of years.
None of these things read emails and have decided to play along in a massive international conspiracy.
Scott A. Mandia, Professor - Meteorology
www2.sunysuffolk.edu/mandias/global_warming/
Scott A. Mandia - A classic "Flat Earther" - a game-fully supported member of the society that refuses to get the "A" out of GW.
No one needs to be a scientist to recognize FRAUD, and more specifically, the fraud that supports the argument of Anthropogenic in the global warming/climate change research.
All of the examples you cite could just as easily be for global warming/climate change without the "A"!
The emails and additional investigations suggest that these "Flat Earth" AGW scientists clearly have some history of massaging their data — to be honest, practically water-boarding their data — to get it to fit their other various results. Results they can no longer even replicate on their own data systems.
They had successfully managed to restrict peer review to what we might call the “RealClimate clique” — the small group of true believers they knew could be trusted to say the right things.
As a result, it looks like they found themselves trapped. They had big and visi
Thank you, Scott. I'm very glad I read this piece and was lead to your comments. Your site is just great - thanks so much for all your efforts and expertise and promotion of objective science.
Thank you, Scott. I'm very glad I read this piece and was lead to your comments. Your site is just great - thanks so much for all your efforts and expertise and promotion of objective science.
"record snow levels across Northeast America "
******
lol that's an indicator of increased precipitation, not decreased temperature. it's called "climate change."
'Climategate' was silly and has been debunked. It is intellectually dishonest to keep this article online. But that's what that side does, keep the lie alive as long as possible.
Got something to say?
Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!