We think you're near Los Angeles

Currently in Los Angeles

Location: Los Angeles Current temperature: 65°F: Current condition: Clear See Extended Forecast

A challenge to Senator Jim DeMint to a debate on TSA collective bargaining rights

Sen. Jim DeMint at recent Tea Party rally. Collective action good for Tea Partiers but bad for TSA?
Sen. Jim DeMint at recent Tea Party rally. Collective action good for Tea Partiers but bad for TSA?
Photo credit: 
Examiner.com

When I opened my copy of The Washington Post recently I noticed a particularly troubling quote attributed to Senator Jim DeMint (R-SC):

DeMint had placed a hold on Southers's nomination in an effort to prevent TSA workers from entering into collective bargaining. In his statement Friday, he said Southers "has not been forthcoming about whether he'll give union bosses control of our airport security, which is one of the most important decisions he'll make as head of the TSA."

Normally it is frowned upon to write about current issues in such a personal way; but I feel obligated to do so in this article. After all Sen. DeMint you were talking about me since I was the first elected president of American Federation of Government Employees Local 1, the national union representing the interests of TSA’s workforce. This ‘union boss’ want to issue a challenge to you to debate me on these issues; on why you feel that TSA workers in particular should not be treated with the dignity and respect and sense of partnership with management that exists only in a workplace with collective bargaining rights.

Sen. DeMint, collective bargaining doesn’t just protect workers; it protects us all. Remember the so called Miracle on the Hudson? That was no miracle. That was workers properly trained; from pilots, to flight attendants, to air traffic controllers, to first responders. In that case collective bargaining protected the passengers, the community surrounding the airport and yes the company’s profits. You see Sen. DeMint their various collective bargaining agreements ensured that management would face consequences if they attempted to circumvent required training procedures. That’s not true at TSA.

TSA is required by Congress to provide adequate training. Why don’t they? Well since TSA has historically high attrition rates, low staffing levels have put management in a bind. When choosing adequate training even if it causes long lines, they chose customer service over security every time. Time and time again while receiving explosives training (carried out on the checkpoint itself by the way as TSA didn’t have funding for training facilities) training could be cut short to knock the line down. After all, passengers only see Thousands Standing Around when trying to make their flight while half the checkpoint is training on a closed lane.

The lack of collective bargaining caused the attrition and made it virtually impossible to complain about inadequate training. I was terminated for an op-ed in The Washington Post calling on Congress to exercise greater oversight and demanding that TSA provide required training.

Remember the recent Fort Hood attack? The officer who prevented the gunman from inflicting further casualties is a civilian government worker and an AFGE member. If she worked under TSA’s laizze faire system would those serving to protect the Fort Hood community have adequate training or staffing? It’s not a stretch to suggest that things may have turned out tragically differently without collective bargaining on that day.

Senator DeMint, a great labor leader once said: “The boss’s brain is under the worker’s cap”. What that means is that Transportation Security Officers know more about the realities of aviation security than anyone in management or working for a for-profit contractor. To refuse the partnership that collective bargaining ensures is to run an Agency with inadequate resources. Each holiday season upper management makes a big show of helping out on the checkpoints and it’s sadly comical because they can’t do the job of a TSO. Yet they set policy, have virtually unrestricted power over TSO’s and often take what the New York Times called the ‘golden revolving door’ to private for-profit contractors hoping to cash in on the War on Terror money.

Like those managers, you never wore the uniform Sen. DeMint and I presume neither your staff nor benefactors stood up to serve after 9/11. But your ignorance and lack of experience is no excuse.

I challenge you to a debate. Defend the record of TSA’s personnel management over the last eight years and explain how we are safer continuing the same failed policies. Also, explain how unsafe you feel protected in your workplace by officers enjoying the benefits of collective bargaining. This issue is too important for politics and you need to explain to the American people why you continue to obstruct basic workplace freedoms.

I’m willing to debate you on the Fox News Channel so you can feel right at home. At the risk of offending my liberal friends, I’ve debated the Employee Free Choice Act on Fox and Friends and found it to be a fair, balanced and respectful environment. Its time to give those who serve each day in this nation’s airports and elsewhere the respect they deserve and if you continue to stand in opposition they deserve a proper explanation. I’m awaiting your response.

 

Advertisement

, DC Special Interests Examiner

Ron Moore is a freelance writer living in Silver Spring, Maryland with decades of service in the grassroots community as a local union president, union organizer, national AFL-CIO staff, and writer for the A. Philip Randolph Institute. Contact Ron at ron_e_moore@yahoo.com

Comments

  • Examiner Reader 2 years ago

    That is quite an assertion that the unionized workers are far better trained than those who aren't union. While you infer that DeMint's are ridiculous, maybe you should reread your own!

  • Warner Todd Huston 2 years ago

    Imagine, a union thug pretending to be civil enough to "debate" anyone! Are you going to bring a bat to the talkfest? Maybe 20 or 30 "friends" that will "convince" Mr. DeMint that you mean business?

  • Work unite Vote 2 years ago

    Only money hungry corp thugs and those who receive political contributions believe unions hurt this country. D Bag DeMint is way over paid and we all should put up a stink about that....... along with the golden parachute retirement and there own special little health plan.
    Fight for a living wage and your a thug....
    Ruin the USA bank system Tax dollars of hard working Americans will bail you out... The real thugs argued for giving away the bonuses. "It's a contract they say" Please.. Deminted and his party are so out of touch with the majority of voters (the worker) And yes they are better trained. TSA is not run right. It has way to many managers. The Dumb arse Demint says tsa officials will need to clear it with union bosses. Well right now there needs to be lass bosses period. He is blocking the nomination. He knows that Southers will most likely clean house of the old Bush military style of operations..

  • Al Timeter 2 years ago

    Mr. Moore used to work with TSA. It would be a Joy to see them debate.
    Of course it wont ever happen.
    Mr. DeMinnow meat would never attempt such a thing.

  • Krista Kennedy 2 years ago

    As a former instructor for TSA, LTSO and employee of 6 years, I can factually accept that the assertion that unionized workers are far better trained than those who arent' union. Management cuts corners continuously to 'look good' to their superiors, meanwhile the training offers are mininmal, repeatitive, and in many cases ignored. This inability to train its staff of officers appropriately is evidenced again and again. The ineffective training , also address moral issues of officers, which can address saftety of the flying public... If you aren't giving the officers the tools they need to be successfull, because management is focused on their own needs and directions, then many are not only failing from lack of training but also from lack of moral and confidence in their ability to perform their duty. The unionzation of these officer will definatley mean better security in transportation and the movement of people and commerce.

  • Krista Kennedy 2 years ago

    "Mr. Moore used to work with TSA. It would be a Joy to see them debate.
    Of course it wont ever happen.
    Mr. DeMinnow meat would never attempt such a thing"

    Very true, DeMint would rather stand on the backs of TSA officers as his political 'look at me' platform heats up. Just this week he talked with Matt Lower on the Today show, he was there to talk about his interests or commments concerning the health care debate, yet couldn't help slipping the TSA comments in there . He would have never made it to the Today show without walking all over the interests of the TSA Officers and riding on their misery...

Add a new comment

Join the conversation! Log in here or create a new account if you've never registered before.

Got something to say?

Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!

Don't miss...