Despite the Human Genome Project announcing in 2008 that 'Modern humans left Africa over 60,000 years ago in a migration that many believe was responsible for nearly all of the human population that exist outside Africa today' it appears the white supremacist neo-Nazi ideology is still going strong. It might be useful to share information on where the Nazi fable is transparently false, so I pulled together 10 facts to round out the information presented in the attached video.
Fact 1:
The 5th century Grail and Arthurian legends are Celtic. Arthur was from Cornwall, UK. The Romans called the non-Celt tribes in northeast Europe 'germanic' – meaning 'related' – and recorded that these people were less civilized than the Celtic Gauls living in the region of modern France. These legends are not ancient and Germans have no connection to the Grail legend.
Fact 2:
The religious practices of the Tibetans is Buddhism. Siddhārtha Gautama Buddha was born in 563 BC as a prince of the Shakya clan of the Solar Dynasty of Vedic tradition. His place of birth was at Lumbini Nepal. His genealogy is documented and leaves no chance that Nazis were ancestral to his lineage.
Fact 3:
The earliest runic inscriptions date from around AD 150. It's a derivation of the Old Italic alphabets of antiquity. Compared to Mesopotamia, Egypt, Akkadia and Greece, development of Rune is about 5000 years behind other cultures. There is nothing 'superior' about late budding literacy among the Germanic peoples. Any claim to being an advanced prehistoric lost civilization is false.
Fact 4:
Tacitus and Herodotus wrote about the old German religion, custom and ancestry:
Tacitus (AD 98) wrote in De Origine et situ Germanorum of the Germans:
"In ancient lays, their only type of historical tradition, they celebrate Tuisto, a god brought forth from the earth. They attribute to him a son, Mannus, the source and founder of their people, and to Mannus three sons, from whose names those nearest the Ocean are called Ingvaeones, those in the middle Herminones, and the rest Isvaeones."
Herodotus (484 – 425 BC) wrote in Histories, 1.125, of the Germanians:
Those which Cyrus (600–576 BC) assembled and persuaded to revolt from the Medes were the principal ones on which all the others are dependent. These are the Pasargadae, the Maraphians, and the Maspians, of whom the Pasargadae are the noblest. The Achaemenidae, from which spring all the Perseid kings, is one of their clans. The rest of the Persian tribes are the following: the Panthialaeans, the Derusiaeans, the Germanians, who are engaged in husbandry; the Daans, the Mardians, the Dropicans, and the Sagartians, who are nomads.
Fact 5:
Claims that Tuisto, a 1st century figure, was the Vedic Tvastri, brother of Indra, are false. Tvastri and Indra's parents were named Kasyapa and Aditi. Kasyapa was in Kashmir at least by 18,000 BP, to witness the draining of the Satisara Lake. Some geological studies suggest an even earlier date. When Tvastri lived, Germany was thawing out from the last Ice Age. The Vedic period was done and over with before Tuisto was even born.
Fact 6:
There is no Indian 'aryan race'. The word 'arya' is Sanskrit for 'noble', as opposed to 'mleccha', meaning 'barbarian'. An aryan was considered an educated and refined person of any bloodline. Their skin was black, golden, white and even blue-black. Vedic people intermarried with other tribes, all of whom trace to Kasyapa and Daksha's daughters. The Vedic priests loathed barbarism and lewdness in others, but they tolerated it among themselves and their devas. They also envied economic success and despised the military strength of neighbouring kings, whether noble or barbarian. They certainly weren't fair-minded in their biases, but neither were they concerned about racial purity and inter-caste breeding. The Vedic 'aryan' bears no semblance to race-based aryanism.
Aryans and Mlecchas, O Kauravya, and many races, O lord, mixed of the two elements, drink the waters of the following rivers... (MBH 6.9)
The mlecchas are the dirt of mankind: the oilmen are the dirt of the Mlecchas; eunuchs are the dirt of oilmen; they who avail of the priestly ministrations of Kshatriyas, in their sacrifices, are the dirt of eunuchs. (MBH 8.45)
It was here that Bhima gained Hidimva the sister of the Rakshasa he slew for a wife, and it was of her that Ghatotkacha was born. (MBH 1.61)
And thus sprang the Kshatriya race from Kshatriya ladies by Brahmanas of ascetic penances. (MBH 1.64)
Fact 7:
There was a tribe of people who self-identified as Arians, there was a territory called Ariana and there was even a king named Ariantas, but none of these entities are Indian or Vedic. The Arians were Medes. The Median kingdom began around 678 BC and ended when Astyages was dethroned in 550 BC. The Median capital was Ecbatana, modern day Hamadan in Iran. The territory called Ariana was west and north of the Indus River in ancient times and roughly corresponds to Pakistan, Afghanistan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan. There was a Scythian king named Ariantas. There was also a Scythian king named Madya, who ruled the Median Empire from 633 – 625 BC. The Scythians were an Iranian nomadic people from Eastern Europe and Central Asia.
Herodotus (484 – 425 BC) wrote in Histories, 7.62:
The Medes had exactly the same equipment as the Persians; and indeed the dress common to both is not so much Persian as Median. They had for commander Tigranes, of the race of the Achaemenids. These Medes were called anciently by all people Arians; but when Media, the Colchian, came to them from Athens, they changed their name. Such is the account which they themselves give.
Strabo (64/63 BC – 24 AD) wrote in Geography, Book XV, Chapter 1, sections 1-25:
It was particularly apparent from my former discussion that the summary account set forth in the third book of his geography by Eratosthenes ( 276 – 195 BC) of what was in his time regarded as India, that is, when Alexander (356 – 323 BC) invaded the country, is the most trustworthy; and the Indus River was the boundary between India and Ariana, which latter was situated next to India on the west and was in the possession of the Persians at that time; 689 for later the Indians also held much of Ariana, having received it from the Macedonians.
Herodotus (484 – 425 BC) wrote in Histories, 4.81:
...the Scythian bowl holds with ease six hundred amphorae, and is of the thickness of six fingers' breadth. The natives gave me the following account of the manner in which it was made. One of their kings, by name Ariantas, wishing to know the number of his subjects, ordered them all to bring him, on pain of death, the point off one of their arrows.
Fact 8:
The Aryan Invasion Theory has no basis in historical fact. Paleoarchaeology findings throughout India affirm that the subcontinent has been populated at least since 34,000 BP. The Rig Veda was composed between 1700 and 1100 BC, the Vedic civilization existed between 2000–500 BC, the Indus Valley civilization exited between 3300–1300 BC. Darius conquered the Indus in 515 BC. Alexander invaded India in 326 BC. No one can lay claim to the Vedic texts, but autochthonous Indian people.
Herodotus (484 – 425 BC) wrote in Histories, 4.44
After this voyage was completed, Darius (550 – 486 BC) conquered the Indians, and made use of the sea in those parts.
Strabo (64/63 BC – 24 AD) wrote in Geography, Book XV, Chapter 1, sections 1-25:
And Megasthenes (350 – 290 BC) virtually agrees with this reasoning when he bids us to have no faith in the ancient stories about the Indians; for, he says, neither was an army ever sent outside the country by the Indians nor did any outside army ever invade their country and master them, except that with Heracles and Dionysus and that in our times with the Macedonians.
Fact 9:
This is actually very ironic. Either the Nazis hadn't studied the Vedic texts or they assumed no one else studied the Vedic text. As the video tells us, the Nazis got white supremacist ideology from the Bhagavad Gita. The main characters are Krishna and Arjuna, whose wife was Draupadi, also named Krishna. The composer of the Mahabharata, including the Gita, is Krishna Dvaipayana. The word 'krishna' means 'black' in Sanskrit and all 3 people so named were black-skinned. Parvati was dark too. Many prominent people in ancient India were black-skinned. Suggesting white supremacist ideology existed in Vedic culture is just another example of make-believe history.
Fact 10:
The Nazi think tank put a great deal of effort into collecting ancient artifacts and apprising their propagandists of religious history. The fruit of their effort is a religion that they called Positive Christianity. It's a hodgepodge of exciting and mysterious myths and legends from ancient cultures around the world. And not one of those illustrious legends can be traced to Nazi origin or visa versa.
Those are the historic fact about 'arians' and 'aryans' and the human migration out of Africa. Yet, if that doesn't convince us all that Neo-Nazi ideology is just plain silly, perhaps now is a good time to mention that 'all non-Africans are part Neanderthal'. Can you guess where our Neanderthal and Sapiens ancestors met up for a little kiss and cuddle?
Comments