
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - Valerie Schwartz started shooting heroin just before her 14th birthday.
“Nobody twisted my arm,” she said, holding an unlit, unfiltered cigarette outside the Women’s Building in the Mission district Thursday. “I was curious.”
Now 54, Schwartz has been clean for five months. It’s not the first time — she has struggled with heroin addiction for the last 40 years. She is also battling MRSA — a drug-resistant, often-deadly bacteria — and is using a wheelchair.
On Thursday, Schwartz shared her story with a packed room of health officials to voice her support for what is sure to raise a national firestorm — creating a government-sponsored facility in San Francisco where users can inject drugs, including heroin, methamphetamine and crack cocaine, to battle The City’s high incidence of fatal drug overdoses.
The discussion was spurred by the Thursday symposium, co-sponsored by the San Francisco Department of Public Health, on the only such “safe injection” facility in North America, a four-year-old Vancouver site where an estimated 700 intravenous users per day self-administer narcotics.
At these facilities, addicts are allowed to bring drugs and shoot up under the supervision of a medical staff. “We are exploring the pros and cons of this,” said Grant Colfax, director of HIV prevention for the Department of Public Health. “Our main goal is to get drug users into treatment.”
Alex Kral, director of the Urban Health Program for the research institute RTI International, said there are 18,000 injection-drug users in San Francisco. About 80 percent of them use heroin, he said, while the rest use methamphetamine and crack cocaine.
According to San Francisco Fire Department Capt. Niels Tangherlini, about one in every seven calls to San Francisco paramedics from July 2006 to July 2007 was a drug overdose.
Along with Vancouver, nearly 30 other cities across the globe operate such safe injection sites. No facility exists in the U.S., experts said. This is the first time San Francisco has considered it, said Hilary McQuie, of the Harm Reduction Coalition, an advocacy group for alternative drug treatments.
Supporters of the sites say they reduce crime, the number of discarded syringes on the streets and the number of addicts shooting up in public. Critics, however, say they send the wrong message and could increase drug use.
“It could exacerbate the problem,” said Howard Epstein, spokesman for the San Francisco Republican Party. “I think it will mean that people who are saying, ‘Boy, it’s going to be tough, I got to go hide, now I can just go down there to do it.’ It takes the pressure off them to clean up their act. It’s acceptance.”
Epstein also said finding an appropriate location would be a difficult task. So far, the idea is only in the discussion phase — no proposals have been approved and no sites have been identified.
“It’s really not a black or white issue,” said Katie Bouche, with the San Francisco AIDS Foundation. “People are going to inject whether they do it safely or not. Needle exchange started as a radical idea when it came up.”
The City’s users
18,000 injection-drug users in San Francisco
80 percent of S.F.’s addicts use heroin; others use meth and crack cocaine
More than 60 percent are homeless
9 in 10 have hepatitis C
8 in 10 have hepatitis B
3 in 10 have soft-tissue infections, such as abscesses
1 in 8 overdose each year
1 in 10 have HIV
- Source: RTI International
Wire services contributed to this report.
Voice your opinion and vote in our poll at examiNation SF: How do you feel about your tax dollars funding a facility for users to shoot drugs?
Not ranked |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
|
Sports
Business |
Real Estate Family Movies and Books Venues, Sports and Music Concerts, Artists and Tickets Be Inspired - Quotes and Stories |
Comments from Examiner Readers
11:52 AM MST on Mon., Oct. 29, 2007 re: "Would drug facility be shot in the arm?"
Report as inappropriate
3:05 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 26, 2007
re: "Would drug facility be shot in the arm?"
Report as inappropriate
2:03 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 26, 2007
re: "Would drug facility be shot in the arm?"
Report as inappropriate
11:12 AM MST on Fri., Oct. 26, 2007
re: "Would drug facility be shot in the arm?"
Report as inappropriate
8:44 AM MST on Fri., Oct. 26, 2007
re: "Would drug facility be shot in the arm?"
Report as inappropriate
11:35 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 19, 2007
re: "Would drug facility be shot in the arm?"
Report as inappropriate
7:55 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 19, 2007
re: "Would drug facility be shot in the arm?"
Report as inappropriate
6:10 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 19, 2007
re: "Would drug facility be shot in the arm?"
Report as inappropriate
5:38 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 19, 2007
re: "Would drug facility be shot in the arm?"
Report as inappropriate
3:49 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 19, 2007
re: "Would drug facility be shot in the arm?"
Report as inappropriate
3:29 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 19, 2007
re: "Would drug facility be shot in the arm?"
Report as inappropriate
1:56 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 19, 2007
re: "Would drug facility be shot in the arm?"
Report as inappropriate
1:51 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 19, 2007
re: "Would drug facility be shot in the arm?"
Report as inappropriate
1:24 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 19, 2007
re: "Would drug facility be shot in the arm?"
Report as inappropriate
1:02 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 19, 2007
re: "Would drug facility be shot in the arm?"
Report as inappropriate
12:58 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 19, 2007
re: "Would drug facility be shot in the arm?"
Report as inappropriate
12:57 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 19, 2007
re: "Would drug facility be shot in the arm?"
Report as inappropriate
11:28 AM MST on Fri., Oct. 19, 2007
re: "Would drug facility be shot in the arm?"
Report as inappropriate
11:13 AM MST on Fri., Oct. 19, 2007
re: "Would drug facility be shot in the arm?"
Report as inappropriate
10:56 AM MST on Fri., Oct. 19, 2007
re: "Would drug facility be shot in the arm?"
Report as inappropriate
mz.unknown said:
let me know what type of shots do you get to cure h.i.v or aids.where do you get certain shots to cure certain shots.if you are receiving a shot in your buttox whta type of shot is that and what does it cure?if you could let me know what type of shtos are for what and where are they injected that will be much help with my research because a friend or family member is receiving a shot in his or hers buttox and another firend replied that the shot that he or she is being reciecved is a ahot to cure aids and i want to now because if it is why is he or she lying to me.
116 agree | 72 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
tomaso said:
Many people have advanced libertarian arguments w/r/t the war on drugs, citing how we have no right to criminalize non-violent, non-coercive behavior, and how prohibition causes far more problems than it solves. That may be a reasonable intellectual rationale for providing a controlled environment for addicts to get their fixes, but they neglect the other side of the libertarian argument, which is that while people have rights to do with their bodies as they see fit, such exercises come with no responsibility for others to subsidize said activities. Unfortunately, the powers that be in SF have a very lopsided and inconsistent interpretation of libertarian behavior: they are all in favor of the "do-your-own-thing" ethos of the 1960's, but when it comes to paying the price for such actions, they are pure 1930's era socialists. In other words, their zeal for social libertarianism isn't matched with an equal respect for economic libertarianism.
81 agree | 72 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
sickofrisco said:
Based on the data given above, there are more than 10,000, IV-drug using homeless in this city already, yet our brilliant city bureaucrats wants to build a taxpayer-subsidized shooting gallery to attract even MORE of the same? This must be the liberal solution to retaining political power: attract every bum, criminal, and dysfunctional type to the city, give them subsidies, and register to vote. Democrat voters made to order...
111 agree | 74 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Why doesn't this city start caring about the people who work hard and struggle everyday to live here? I am growing tired of these ridiculous proposals that pamper addicts, criminals, and the homeless. How about a proposal to help keep the middle class, artists, and families in this town?
90 agree | 73 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I live in Vancouver; I saw the absolute numbers of addicts explode since the opening of InSite, our supervised injection site. It does draw addicts from all over. Hastings street looks like a Mad Max movie set. If you want that in your city, let the forces of of the self-interested addict support industry convince everybody that if we disagree with their cunning plan, that we are heartless, uneducated and uncaring toward those that are less fortunate. If you don't want what we've got, either protest this with a great deal of energy, or move. I understand many already have. JMHO gh from Vancouver.
80 agree | 76 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I think the reality is that if you have one facility that offers use of heroin (in a safe place) its going to lead to either two things. One is that it will eventually become overcrowded and then there will be a need for more and more facilities. Or two is that the drug users that just scored heroin will probably just end up shooting up then and there instead of making the journey across town and in that case the clinic exists but the needles and heroin use still exists on the street. I think there are some better options.. Has anyone heard of needle park in Amsterdam? They are a lot more lenient with drug use (in Holland) yet the overdosing and needles in public still exists. gotta be a better way
91 agree | 89 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I'd much rather see my tax dollars spent on a safe place for addicts NOT to shoot up. A place where people who want to get free can go, and get encouragement and real support. Needles on the street? Is there a practical reason to give out a needle without requiring one in exchange? Can't programs let exchange be the rule, with only a small allowance for occasional exceptions?
139 agree | 94 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Carl G. said:
I see "Valeries" everyday & they see me. I dont shoot up, & never will. I am not an addict. I have a full time job & care about my community-including addicts. I am thankful I was never lead into the world of drugs. The real problem is that this city does not care & never will-or this would not be an article in the paper. Safe injection facilities would help in theory. Not all addicts are bad people but needles left on our streets every day will continue to be left on our streets by bad people & families will continue to step over them & move out of San Francisco in record numbers. DPW will continue to be called to dispose of needles left on our streets. Not every addict is going to go to a regional safe injection facility & San Francisco will undoubtably not force addicts to go & inject in a city santioned facilty. More likely, more needles that usual will be left on our steets outside these wonderful city sanctioned safe injection facilities. Oh, I can hardly wait.
120 agree | 102 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Chance Martin said:
Chalk another one for the Examiner. Another what, you ask? Another case of having absolutely no respect for the intelligence of your readers. Today, you report that there are 18,000 IDUs in San Francisco, and "more than 60% are homeless." Okay. I read it in the Examiner, so it must be a fact. So what are we to make of the "fact" you reported on October 5th, 2007, two weeks ago, where you cited the city's annual homeless count totaling 6377 homeless people in the city? Is it 10800, as you report today, or 6377 as you reported two weeks ago? It seems to be a number in play, depending on what Mayor Newsom's PR flacks want to sell to the voters this week. It also appears there's no such thing as fact checking in your newsroom prior to publication. We won't even dwell on your abject lack of objective, unbiased, or critical reporting...
139 agree | 100 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Get public injection off the street and out-of-sight. Sounds good to me.
94 agree | 94 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
It will actually save money and reduce costs as no one would end up in an ambulance, emergency room or hospital bed. It'll take the addicts off of the streets,too, and if its worked like they say it works elsewhere, why not here?
98 agree | 92 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
why don't we just go and buy the drugs for our precious addicts too?
95 agree | 96 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Gretchen said:
My gut reaction is "No Way." Yes, I know it works in Vancouver and other places, but that's there and not here. If this is such a positive idea and can actually do good, then let Berkeley or Oakland try it and we can witness for ourselves whether this is a good idea for SF. My feeling is that it is another form of enablement that will attract drug users from other cities. Try it elsewhere in the Bay Area first and then decide. I think once we see the effects we'll decide against it. For now, however, I think it is not in the best interest of the city of SF.
136 agree | 84 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Random SF Taxpayer said:
Safe injection rooms: what a wonderful idea. Why stop at just providing a facility for degenerates to engage in their illicit behavior? Why not add free massages, pedicures and manicures? Heroin users everywhere will be so well taken care of—no need to worry about pesky things like being a useful, productive and valuable member of the San Francisco community. Perhaps the heroin should be given out too. Clean needles, clean heroin…sounds like a great idea. “Heroin users’ spa” has a much better ring to in than safe injection rooms.
96 agree | 96 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Polisehed415 said:
To the other commenter with NO SYMPATHY...most of the individuals that become addicted to drugs have a disease which, once again, if you had done your research, would know is listed in the DSM-IV. Drug addicts are people that need to be helped and deserve sympathy just as someone with cancer does. What happened to tolerance, patience and understanding. Some of you commenters make me want to throw-up because you have no clue what it is like to be addicted or to have a disease apparently. I suggest that you go and walk a mile in your brother's shoes before you condemn him or her. Yes, addicts, just like anyone need to be held accountable for their actions but with out programs such as Bay Area Addictions Treatment and Research these people would not have much hope. I get tired of people bashing heroin addicts especially and it is the people that say mean things like the commenters on this page that do not deserve sympathy. Go out and help someone today, my friend! Aloha! PF
85 agree | 94 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
As a sober addict for more than 10 years I can tell you this will increase the incidence and severity of addiction not to mention the tremendous negative image for a beautiful city. I can't wait to dump my sobriety and live on the syringe in San Francisco, nary a care in the world. Why pay taxes when I can enjoy the ultimate selfish behavior with the good graces of society? We need more people who are willing to abuse hardwork for the benefit of the uncaring, self centered dregs that should be flushed.
92 agree | 78 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Polisehed415 said:
To the Examiner Reader that bashes 'Harm Reduction Theory;' Firt off you need to become more educated about this theory before you go spouting off! I have worked in Harm Reduction and also in total abstinence. Harm Reducation works! Sometimes it works better than total abstinance. If someone has a safe place to go and has the option of utilizing a methadone maintenance program it sure is a lot better than leaving them to their own devices. When they are hooked up with this type of support they are less likely to commit crime, use dirty needles, and do have more of a chance to get off the drug then if they were left to their own devices. By "assisting their drug use" in this way, though unacceptable to many because it is NOT UNDERSTOOD AS EVIDENCED BY YOU, Heroin addicts are able to clean up and change their lives for the better. What you have, Sir or Madam, is what is known as contempt prior to investigation. I hope that we give these unfortunate people a chance to change.
147 agree | 99 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Your first problem: 18,ooo intravenious drug users in SF. You can thank yourself for that number because your 'harm reduction' breeds them. If the DA doesn't prosecute influence and personal possession cases, they have no fear of the law. If you give them needles, they may not get AIDES--they'll just be injectors for life (which ends with Hepatitus anyway). If you give them a place to inject, they feel reinforced in their lifestyle. By assiting their drug use, you are ensuring they will remain loaded for life--always needing YOU. Its about your compassion, after all. Addicts will remain unempoyed, so your shelter employees have jobs. Nurses will have jobs. Counsellors will counsel. Food freebie outlets will keep their grants. Everyone is happy--but the addicts you need to run your circus. SF--the land of the load. Soon, Gavin will tear down the GG Bridge to reduce suicides. Libersl are a shot in the arm-a pain that never goes away as they create a legacy of harm reduction fo
155 agree | 88 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I say, just wait until one of these dopes uses heroin, gets in a car and smacks into someone. Sue the city blind--over and over--again and again. The liberal drive to 'reduce harm' winds up harming us every time. When will SF find a way to reduce the chill in a winter wind? www.conservativemusiconlin.com
135 agree | 100 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
So we're supposed to feel sympathy/compassion to someone who's devoted the last forty years to shooting up? I don't have an ounce of either for Valerie Schwartz and others like her. And I'm adamantly opposed to opening a city-funded shooting gallery. With the myriad problems that plague San Francisco, I'm sure much better uses could be found for this money. Additionally, this center would simply function as yet another beacon for lowlifes throughout the country to hop the next freight train to San Francisco.
149 agree | 72 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree