You are here: Los Angeles examiNation

California News

examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?

CommentsComment on this article
Oct 11, 2007 7:11 AM (331 days ago) by Staff, The Examiner
» 331 days ago: examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads? «
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics:

Google has banned anti-Moveon.org ads placed by a firm working for Republican Sen. Susan Collins re-election campaign because they violated Google's trademark policy.

What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?

Sound off and add your voice to a local daily discussion. Vote in our poll, then just scroll to the comment box below, tell us what you think and click "Send." Read and respond to other examiNation questions.

Vovici Online Survey Software

» 331 days ago: examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads? «

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

6:38 AM MST on Wed., Feb. 6, 2008 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Examiner Reader said:
Just another example of the known provable bias of the common news media. 'Move on' is just another communist based left wing group. Every knee shall bow!

 51 agree | 46 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

1:28 PM MST on Wed., Oct. 17, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Lee - Long Island said:
Lou is correct - MoveOn has NO copyright or trademark privileges. Their use of a trademark symbol and subsequent claim of trademark violation is a fraud.

 112 agree | 111 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:39 AM MST on Tue., Oct. 16, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Examiner Reader said:
When the Reich-wing RepubliCONs are given a taste of their own medicine they hate it. We know now that the White House tells ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, and FNC what is permissible to print and what is not. The goading of the U.S. into war with Iraq was an example of media control--suppressing the liberal POV and free speech in general.

 138 agree | 118 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:28 PM MST on Mon., Oct. 15, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Examiner Reader said:
The left can only win through deceit and proper spelling.

 109 agree | 104 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:13 PM MST on Mon., Oct. 15, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Examiner Reader said:
I have to wonder how a political candidate is not allowed to use the entity name of their political antagonist in a political ad. I suppose if she had used "That Move On Organization" vs. Moveon.org, there wouldn't have been any "Copyright" violation. This event reinforces the fact that liberalism cannot flourish unless it can shut down any honest political debate. That's how China controls its populace. Now, remembering that Google is the same service that blocks the average Chinese user from learning much of what that government doesn't want it's citizenry to know I guess we can begin to understand the hollow copyright excuse.

 118 agree | 111 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:17 PM MST on Sun., Oct. 14, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Examiner Reader said:
The only way the "left" can win anything is through decete. They will stop at nothing to get control of this country. Those of us that care, need to be aware of these organizations and their backers and make sure they pay.

 111 agree | 124 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:47 PM MST on Sun., Oct. 14, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Lou - New York said:
I noticed the moveon web pages do not have a copyright or trademark notification, except for what appears to be a small "r" symbol next to their slogan. A search of the United States Patent and Trademark Office indicates no registered trademarks for moveon - so how can they claim legal ownership?

 118 agree | 114 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:59 AM MST on Sun., Oct. 14, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Mikkel Markussen said:
The people here asking for "congressional oversight" and "investigation" ought to do a little investigation on their own, along with the journalist who wrote this article. Neither the journalist of this article, nor the people making knee-jerk decisions because of it, have apparently bothered looking into how Google does its advertising. Any trademark owner can contact Google and request that their trademarks not be used in Google's advertising, and request any existing ads pulled from the system. You do not need expressed permission to use a trademark that the holder hasn't requested as blocked, whether favourable or unfavourable to the trademark or the holder of the trademark. That's Google policy, that has always been Google's policy, and that has never been selectively enforced as this joke of a journalist reports. Quit the inane knee-jerk reactions, and take some time to actually get an understanding of what you decide that you're against. Ignoramuses.

 120 agree | 97 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:43 AM MST on Sun., Oct. 14, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Tore Bekkedal said:
The advertisement was pulled because of an entirely valid trademark violation complaint. I don't see the problem, and I certainly don't see any left-wing conspiracies here... Critical of moveon as I may be.

 108 agree | 126 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:17 AM MST on Sun., Oct. 14, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Examiner Reader said:
Haha I love how all of you conservatives latch on to any piece of news that lets you whine and whimper about "the liberal establishment" and how you're so victimized by the media. look around! if the media is so leftist-controlled, how in the world does fox news exist? have you ever turned on your AM radio? nothing but right-wing outrage! so go ahead, go call in to bill o'riley, rush limbaugh, joe scarborough, or your favorite neo-con talk show host of choice and cry about your repression at the hands of the liberal media! but DON'T CRY TO ME!

 107 agree | 97 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:47 PM MST on Sat., Oct. 13, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Examiner Reader said:
Its probably more about competing dollars. Apparently Moveon.org pays Google fairly continuous large amounts of cash for services. A few one time adds from a single politician can not compete. Moveon.org may have threatened to pull their money. Not that they would want to stop any freedom of speech. However Google will need to be carefull in the future, there are laws regarding equal time/equal advertising. They may find themselves the target of lawsuits and regulatory violations, costing them more than their revenue from Moveon.org.

 113 agree | 113 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:07 PM MST on Sat., Oct. 13, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Doug said:
Google actions are offensive, and their response insulting to my intelligence. So, anyone with a trademark is beyond public criticism? MoveOn specializes in political hatchet jobs. I've removed Google from my search bar and replace it with Yahoo.

 122 agree | 108 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:30 PM MST on Sat., Oct. 13, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Examiner Reader said:
Well for all you right wing conservatives, you now know how it feels to have large corporations take sides against your personal agendas. This is nothing new principally--only that now it bothers you instead of your opposing counterparts. Go Google and even the scoreboard.

 126 agree | 117 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:27 PM MST on Sat., Oct. 13, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Examiner Reader said:
Google isn't keeping the information away from anybody, just some ads (which could've been reworded and resubmitted if I read right). You can easily find any right-wing crazy talk you want by using Google's search. It's understandable why Google doesn't encourage libelous back and forthery in it's advertising model. Granted, I personally find it unfair that corporations as big as Google have the power to distort the information we receive, but it's not something Google invented. So now some of you are banning Google. That'll teach 'em. I want to ban NBC for censoring people's opinions on the war during the Emmy's, but the Office is just soooo funny.

 110 agree | 100 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:14 PM MST on Sat., Oct. 13, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Examiner Reader said:
I will not use google from now on .Where is the ACLU ?If google wants to be a partisan org , they need to get registered.

 87 agree | 118 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:29 PM MST on Sat., Oct. 13, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Examiner Reader said:
Party A submits ad using party B's trademark, party B complains, Google removes ad. Why is this news again?

 125 agree | 129 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:53 PM MST on Sat., Oct. 13, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Examiner Reader said:
Trademark Law has a Fair Use doctrine just like Copyright Law (though it's a different doctrine). Using trademarks nominatively IS allowed, so Google definitely is not doing this because they have to. It's possible that their policy is stricter than the actual law. If that's the case, then it's broken and they need to change it. There's no reason for them to hamstring people and companies who want to put up critical or comparative ads.

 127 agree | 113 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:43 PM MST on Sat., Oct. 13, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Examiner Reader said:
The observations below seem to emanate from a bunch of tunnel brained right wingers. Google has improved all of your lives and thank god they have a social conscience. History has shown the world moves forward with liberal thinking and is held back by conservatives. Leave Google if you like and watch the world leave you behind.

 126 agree | 129 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:43 PM MST on Sat., Oct. 13, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Examiner Reader said:
Rightwing hypocrite: A private corporation can do what it wants! The decision is upto the private owners. Rightwing hypocrite gets censors by private leftwing corp controlling the world... Rightwing hypocrite: waaahhh I'm being censored! The temerity, the rules apply to everybody but ME! Excuse me while I go and get a kleenex for these huge crocodile tears.

 156 agree | 106 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:12 PM MST on Sat., Oct. 13, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Examiner Reader said:
I'm going to quit using Google since they have become so politically motivated. There are other services out there that I will choose from now on.Margaret Helena, Montana

 126 agree | 92 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:59 AM MST on Sat., Oct. 13, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Examiner Reader said:
I find it alarming that media outlets are censoring what they will allow the public to see based on personal or political beliefs, I understand they have the right to deny any client ad space, but I also have the right to stop using their service, and do regularly, I would hate to stop using google, but if they begin a left leaning bias, I will block them. Eric Parsons Atlanta, GA

 125 agree | 125 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:41 AM MST on Sat., Oct. 13, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Examiner Reader said:
The typical liberal mantra, I know what's good for you, but it doesn't apply to me. Bye Bye Google Hello Yahoo

 106 agree | 129 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:47 AM MST on Sat., Oct. 13, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Examiner Reader said:
Didn't Google also modify its software to restrict web access in China? And now this? What a bunch of leftist wimps.

 162 agree | 122 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:04 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 12, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Examiner Reader said:
Metacrawlers are better search engines anyway, as long as google, isnt used by them! Anyone ever notice how cowerdly and underhanded some liberals are while claiming to beleive in freedom and tolerence they hate it!!!

 144 agree | 124 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:33 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 12, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Examiner Reader said:
Google has been my preferred search engine for about 8 years. No longer. I think I'll give someone else a try.

 111 agree | 121 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:26 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 12, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Examiner Reader said:
Some time ago, MoveOn.org submitted a request to Google that its trademark not be used in any ads, and as a result their advertiser support team offered instructions on how Senator Collins' campaign could edit and resubmit its ad. If ads are running on Google that include trademark terms in their text, either the trademark owner has not submitted a complaint, or the advertiser has been authorized to use the trademark. It's very unfortunate, but it's poorly researched journalism like this that gives a good cause a terribly bad name. Research, research, research BEFORE opening mouth and inserting foot.

 123 agree | 115 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:37 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 12, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Examiner Reader said:
Google has been my homepage for years on my home computer, laptop computer and office computer. I am done with them as of now. The only way to make these crazy people understand is to stop doing business with them. I agree, no more Bruce and there are very few movies I will see now because of the actors and there opinions Whats the best alternative for a search engine?

 124 agree | 110 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:34 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 12, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Examiner Reader said:
Google apparently attended the Burma Miliatary Junta's instructions on denying freedom of expession to anyone who disagrees with you. Google must not consider itself-the press, just a technicality I guess. Rousseau would be proud of Google.

 118 agree | 115 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:07 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 12, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 NOVA Gal said:
Google executives are entitled to their own views, but what hypocrites! Google is running around calling for network neutrality and arguing that we must protect against companies such as Verizon, AT&T, Comcast, and Time Warner censoring the Internet and deciding who can access what. Yet, Google does the very same thing. Walk the talk!

 120 agree | 113 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:54 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 12, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Reality Check said:
This is a clear violation of Federal Election regulations. Google has in fact become a partner of MoveOn.org, MediaMatters, and most importantly the Democrat Party. Their refusals to allow views that oppose the DNC's candidates and their talking points is repugnant.

 139 agree | 149 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:49 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 12, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Examiner Reader said:
Google as well as any other human owned company has its political preferences. If they prefer to cater to the left wing thats their preference. While I do feel this is politically motivated I also feel that if we as a public don't like what google does, we should then take our business elsewhere. Can anyone say Yahoo, MSOutlook, AOL, etc... Heck start your own media giant. If you don't like youTube, try ebaumsworld, or flurl. Remember, there are always alternatives people! Google doesn't own the world.

 156 agree | 130 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:48 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 12, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Examiner Reader said:
My days of using Google are over. Doesn't really matter; I was always more of a Yahoo anyway. I just wished that MoveOn would move on and take that greasy slimeball Soros with them.

 129 agree | 102 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:42 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 12, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Examiner Reader said:
Google is out. Just shows that if you give lots of money to a jerk, he will just be a rich jerk, not a good person. That whole 'do no evil' apparently doesn't apply to Chinese OR American censorship of the web. So where can we go to search without censorship and political subterfuge?

 118 agree | 113 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:38 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 12, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Examiner Reader said:
The notion that "MoveOn.org" can be trademarked is in error. By setting itself up as a political lobbying organization, MoveOn.org does not enjoy intellectual or trade mark property rights protection. Google's reasoning is false, but they have clearly aligned themselves with the Anti-American slime Soros. But then again, I think George Soros is a commie bastard who ought to be run out of the USA on a rail. Perhaps Senator Collins should replace "MoveOn.org" with "Slimeball Greek Criminal" and see if they still reject the ads.

 159 agree | 116 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:37 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 12, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Examiner Reader said:
It is definitely time to delete Google from my search engine choice. Yahoo is the selection for the future. I will also encourage my friends and workplace to delete Google. Freedom of speech continues to be only for the liberals. If you don't speak their language - then don't speak. This smells of biased politics.

 131 agree | 121 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:14 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 12, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Examiner Reader said:
I believe you better serve the public by being unbiased which you,ve chosen not to be. I will now make mmy homepage Yahoo and encourage friends and family to do the same. MoveOn.Org is about as biased an organiztion that you'll find. Hope your advertisers recognize this and "MoveOn" to an unbiased Search Engine!!!

 135 agree | 104 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:02 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 12, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Examiner Reader said:
This is definitely politically motivated. I have a feeling the 800 pound gorilla will no doubt get a dose of their own medicine when Moveon goes after the huge corporate giant in the future.

 114 agree | 116 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:55 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 12, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Examiner Reader said:
I'm done using Google. I'm a democrat, somewhat liberal, but do not support what MoveOn did nor the pasivity of our democratic follower-ship. Time to divorce democratic party from Hillary and MoveON.

 158 agree | 129 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:46 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 12, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Enos Standridge said:
As in all things today. politics jump out at you and this crummy little move by GOOGLE shows they don't really care what we, the customer thinks. partial birth abortion should have women in an uproar but not a "WORD". and groups like PETA will scream at killing of a fish but stand by while a doctor (killer) pulls a child partially out of it's mothers womb and rams a needle in it's brain. where can I go to replace GOOGLE. my only way of protesting the far-left crazies in our country is to "NOT BUY" I refuse to watch a Baldwin movie or play a Springstein song. it probably does no good at all but it makes me feel like i'm doing something and my consious is clear. i sleep better at night because of my protest.

 127 agree | 120 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:38 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 12, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Pepper said:
I wouldn't dare go to google's website now. Might violate trademarks by allowing their logo to appear on my screen.

 151 agree | 95 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:21 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 12, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Examiner Reader said:
I have "Googled" something for the last time. Any links, shortcuts, bookmarks and references to them have been removed from my PC, my wife's PC, my work PC and hopefully anyone I can convince.

 123 agree | 130 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:13 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 12, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Examiner Reader said:
Someone earlier indicated that Google was protecting itself from copyright infringement because Collins' site had a copy of MoveOn's ad. To address that point, Google is not responsible for what is on Collins' site because it has not made a copy of anything on Collins' site. Just linking to a site does not open Google up to being sued. Second Collin's use of the ad is likely protected under the fair use exception since she is commenting on MoveOn's ad which Google should know. Google is just plain censoring what it doesn't like.

 112 agree | 104 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:10 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 12, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Examiner Reader said:
The liberals and their media "darlings" will never tell the truth. It is an impossible task for them as their lies are far more important to be displayed. The new liberal bias against the truth from the media darlings is going to be a cause for the absolute demise of the United States.

 144 agree | 112 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:52 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 12, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 GABoy said:
I also do not agree with Google so don't take what I say wrong. Continue using the Google search facilities, they get nothing from it UNLESS you click on a Google sponsored ad. Use the search but DON'T EVER CLICK ON A GOOGLE SUPPLIED AD no matter where it is - that's their money, not the search engine.

 127 agree | 140 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:35 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 12, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Examiner Reader said:
Google is a good search engine, but it's not indespensible. There are others just as good, if not as well known. Their political censorship takes Google off my favorites list.

 170 agree | 126 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:31 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 12, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Bill Jach said:
I've been a supporter and fan of google for a number of years. It all stopped today. My google home page, the ad support and anything else google is no longer in my life or on the three computers I own. If they want to be political to the left than I will be political to the right when it come to anything google. If their attitude changes down the road maybe mine will. Being neutral and/or balanced in a business like googles would be to their advantage

 110 agree | 105 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:25 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 12, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Examiner Reader said:
There are other search engines. If you are not going to be fair, then you don't deserve my business.

 144 agree | 99 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:19 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 12, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Examiner Reader said:
It is clear that google is violating fairness in its business operation by giving preferential treatment to those it politically approves. There should be a law against this type of power that does not present both sides of the issue. They must be violating the first amendment.

 121 agree | 126 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:17 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 12, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Examiner Reader said:
Google? Bye ... click!

 116 agree | 126 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:05 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 12, 2007 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Google banning anti-Moveon.org ads?"

 Ruth Davenport said:
I am saddened to see that Google is a part of the MoveOn fanatical far left machine. I have deleted everything "Google" from my computer and will use other search engines from now on.

 128 agree | 123 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement
 
Site Map   
Family Movies and Books
from Walden Media
Venues, Sports and Music
from AEG Worldwide
Concerts, Artists and Tickets
from AEG Live
Be Inspired - Quotes and Stories
The Foundation for a Better Life
© 2008 Copyright Examiner.com.
All Rights Reserved