
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
Article History
SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - A controversial contract that would add desperately needed cash to Muni’s coffers by increasing the number of bus shelters and the amount of advertisements on those structures awaits a final stamp of approval from city officials.
Under a 15-year contract approved by Muni in September, advertising giant Clear Channel Outdoor would maintain the transit agency’s bus shelters and kiosks in return for the right to plaster the structures with advertisements. The contract is expected to funnel more than $300 million in advertising revenue to the cash-strapped agency over the next 20 years — with a $5 million one-time payment in the first year.
The contract, which would run from Dec. 10 to Dec. 9, 2022, and could be extended to 2027, has pitted city officials and some transit advocates, who say cash-strapped Muni needs the additional revenue to improve services, against critics who say the advertisements would contribute to urban blight.
The deal was approved by the Board of Supervisors Budget and Finance Committee on Wednesday and will head to the full board without recommendation for final approval next week.
If Muni extends the contract to 2027, it would receive a minimum of $306 million over the 20-year period, according to the deal documents. Muni officials have estimated the oft-criticized transit system —which carries 672,000 passengers each weekday on 1,000 buses, trains and trolleys — would need a drop of $150 million to develop faster and more reliable service.
The overall concept of the contract is not new — Muni has contracted with advertising and maintenance services for transit shelters since 1987. The current deal with CBS Outdoor, which expires Dec. 9 after 20 years, generates $440,000 each year for The City. Muni does not share in any of the revenue generated through the advertising under the current deal.
However, the new contract with Clear Channel Outdoor pays Muni a minimum average payment of $15.3 million to $19.1 million a year over the life of the 20-year contract, in addition to a $5 million one-time payment within 30 days of the contract approval. The payments include a cut of the advertising revenue.
Under the deal, Clear Channel Outdoor would be required to maintain Muni’s 1,100 existing transit shelters and 39 kiosks. The company would gain the exclusive right to sell print advertising on the structures, while also having the option to install an additional 400 shelters and 111 kiosks with Muni’s approval.
However, resistance to the deal has culminated into a nonbinding proposition being placed on the November ballot, authored by Supervisor Jake McGoldrick, stating there should be no increase in the number of advertisements on city-owned property, including bus shelters.
“It’s about making money,” said Dee Dee Workman, executive director of the nonprofit San Francisco Beautiful, which is against the contract. “While they line their pockets, San Francisco residents suffer.”
Not ranked |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
ARTICLE HISTORY |
Sports
Business |
Real Estate Family Movies and Books Venues, Sports and Music Concerts, Artists and Tickets Be Inspired - Quotes and Stories |
Comments from Examiner Readers
11:39 AM MST on Tue., Oct. 23, 2007 re: "Muni’s ad-space issue: Sign of the times"
Report as inappropriate
10:29 AM MST on Thu., Oct. 11, 2007
re: "Muni’s ad-space issue: Sign of the times"
Report as inappropriate
10:46 PM MST on Fri., Aug. 31, 2007
re: "Cash-strapped Muni offered shelter-ad windfall"
Report as inappropriate
4:49 PM MST on Fri., Aug. 31, 2007
re: "Cash-strapped Muni offered shelter-ad windfall"
Report as inappropriate
2:48 PM MST on Fri., Aug. 31, 2007
re: "Cash-strapped Muni offered shelter-ad windfall"
Report as inappropriate
12:41 PM MST on Fri., Aug. 31, 2007
re: "Cash-strapped Muni offered shelter-ad windfall"
Report as inappropriate
11:04 AM MST on Fri., Aug. 31, 2007
re: "Cash-strapped Muni offered shelter-ad windfall"
Report as inappropriate
10:18 AM MST on Fri., Aug. 31, 2007
re: "Cash-strapped Muni offered shelter-ad windfall"
Report as inappropriate
9:57 AM MST on Fri., Aug. 31, 2007
re: "Cash-strapped Muni offered shelter-ad windfall"
Report as inappropriate
homer j. simpsoy said:
every time MUNI tries to act like a business and do something to enhance revenues and NOT pick our pockets with fare increases and taxes, someone is against it. Then they try and pick our pockets and someone is against it. Sometimes the people need to shut the frak up and let MUNI do something right for a change instead of just bitching,that means you wealthy ladies of pacific heights. go ride your limo to the opera.
133 agree | 113 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Native San Franciscan said:
The supervisors would be fools to turn this contract down. I found Dee Dee Workman's comments laughable where she said “While they line their pockets, San Francisco residents suffer.” I wonder how many times she has been late for work or late for an appoitment due to a late Muni bus. I would rather "suffer" an advertisement at a Muni stop then suffer being chronicly late for work due to the revenue for increased bus service that won't come in if the supes reject this contract. Not only will Clear Channal pay alot more money to Muni operations then CBS Outdoor did, it will also provide bus stop enhancements for the blind, Nextbus installations at all bus stops and a contractual commitment to clean the shelter at least twice a week. Dee Dee Workmand should be less concerned about the "blight" of advertising are more cocerned about the blight of graffiti at bus stops and people who cant get to work on time due to the lack of buses and drivers.
149 agree | 133 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
as a 29 year resident of s.f., through better and worse economic times, MUNI operations have remained, more or less, problematic. i believe MUNI is "institutionally" ill and money is only one component of healing and improving this agency's performance.
162 agree | 126 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
MUNI should be privatized. Start with the Metro. Next, privatize the station agents, outsource the janitorial work. Private companies would never tolerate the crap we put up with. MUNI is like urban school districts. They have far too many employees doing things that privcate business can do.
165 agree | 171 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Just keep throwing money at MUNI. It doesn't matter if its municipal funds or that from the private sector - just keep hoping that something sticks, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha. Oh ya, betcha a fare increase is comin too!!!!!!!
161 agree | 185 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Huh, the Board of Sups raising fares, never. I thought this was a transit first town.
200 agree | 159 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Lincoln Navigator said:
Rather than take advertising dollars, the Supes would rather have us pay higher MUNI fares or ream the property tax payers some more. For crying out loud, take the corporate dough and make MUNI better. I can't believe anyone would pay to advertise on MUNI, but if they're suckers, take them to the bank!
153 agree | 123 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
San Francisco is not a "world class" city, it is a mid size american city that struggles to keep up. Bad policing, poor public transportation, homelessness, grafitti the list is long. San Francisco exists in spite of itself. If selling as space on a bus shelter will bring in money you can rest assured that those "in charge" will find a way to get it. In spite of the citizens.
169 agree | 111 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
How in the world can MUNI be strapped for cash????? It is a never ending cash cow with little to no improvement. MUNI gets, I believe, most of the City's budget revenues and it still can't operate in a fashion befitting a world class city. Something just isn't right here!!!!! The Mayor keeps saying, like mayor's past that things are better. I don't see it. Then again, he says the homeless situation is great, I don't see that AT ALL! A city that can't even keep its streets clean which is the most simple of city services will not, I am afraid, be able to do anything about MUNI's woes. Unfortunate, but true.
137 agree | 117 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree