Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?
Sound off and add your voice to a local daily discussion. Vote in our poll, then just scroll to the comment box below, tell us what you think and click "Send." Read and respond to other examiNation questions.



Comments from Examiner Readers
2:41 PM MST on Wed., Mar. 19, 2008 re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
10:15 AM MST on Wed., Mar. 19, 2008
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
3:23 PM MST on Fri., Jan. 25, 2008
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
9:23 AM MST on Sun., Nov. 11, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
8:13 PM MST on Sat., Nov. 10, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
11:34 AM MST on Fri., Nov. 9, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
8:20 AM MST on Tue., Oct. 30, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
5:51 PM MST on Mon., Oct. 22, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
9:43 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 12, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
3:25 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 12, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
12:54 PM MST on Wed., Oct. 10, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
11:05 AM MST on Wed., Oct. 10, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
5:20 PM MST on Tue., Oct. 9, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
3:13 PM MST on Tue., Oct. 9, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
2:07 PM MST on Tue., Oct. 9, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
1:13 PM MST on Tue., Oct. 9, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
12:55 PM MST on Tue., Oct. 9, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
11:25 AM MST on Tue., Oct. 9, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
10:31 AM MST on Tue., Oct. 9, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
9:52 AM MST on Tue., Oct. 9, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
9:50 AM MST on Tue., Oct. 9, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
9:14 AM MST on Tue., Oct. 9, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
7:54 AM MST on Tue., Oct. 9, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
7:40 AM MST on Tue., Oct. 9, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
7:18 AM MST on Tue., Oct. 9, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
6:52 AM MST on Tue., Oct. 9, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
5:37 AM MST on Tue., Oct. 9, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
5:30 AM MST on Tue., Oct. 9, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
2:40 AM MST on Tue., Oct. 9, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
2:11 AM MST on Tue., Oct. 9, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
12:50 AM MST on Tue., Oct. 9, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
12:15 AM MST on Tue., Oct. 9, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
11:47 PM MST on Mon., Oct. 8, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
10:58 PM MST on Mon., Oct. 8, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
10:51 PM MST on Mon., Oct. 8, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
10:40 PM MST on Mon., Oct. 8, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
10:32 PM MST on Mon., Oct. 8, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
10:24 PM MST on Mon., Oct. 8, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
9:27 PM MST on Mon., Oct. 8, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
8:08 PM MST on Mon., Oct. 8, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
7:53 PM MST on Mon., Oct. 8, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
7:12 PM MST on Mon., Oct. 8, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
6:58 PM MST on Mon., Oct. 8, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
6:46 PM MST on Mon., Oct. 8, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
6:44 PM MST on Mon., Oct. 8, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
6:38 PM MST on Mon., Oct. 8, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
5:55 PM MST on Mon., Oct. 8, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
5:53 PM MST on Mon., Oct. 8, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
5:52 PM MST on Mon., Oct. 8, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
5:46 PM MST on Mon., Oct. 8, 2007
re: "examiNation DC: What do you think about Sandy Berger joining Hillary Clinton's campaign?"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
HillBilly needs these kinds of people surrounding her to know what not to do....maybe he advises her and then she does the exact opposite... yeah...right. Maybe she has some documents that need to be shredded.. can you say "WhiteWater Gate"
2 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
He is as dirty as she is so what else is new from this disgusting and totally useless campaign
2 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
typical of the clinton's to hire crooks, since they themselves are crooks, ie. Whitewater, Hillary's insider trading.
37 agree | 26 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Howdy again , hey you know if the Democrats want to go after Rudy because of the Association with Kerik , then the Guilty by association should be the case for Hillary too , for being to in our face with having the gall to throw all the wrongs of the past in all of Americas face , with Sandy Berger , being involved with their campaign , and The lying cheating swinger for a Husband that's got the smooth talk gong all over the place , my God , why do we have laws and rules , and what is the Purpose of right and wrong , with these guys casting a vision across the world as if Anything goes , according to how the Clinton Machine whats it to be , so is this the meaning of what Cronyism , and dictatorship ,etc, man Bush Clinton bush Clinton , its time for some new people , new leadership , all these people are obsolete man , , because they have led our country to a point that change is needed to sustain our freedoms , and it is hard for me to find Comfort in thinking the same set of PEOPLE t
99 agree | 104 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The lack of Bill and Hillary's integrity is apparent. I hope American's open their eyes and see the truth before the 2008 election.With Hillary as President we would have another corrupt Clinton Administration. We would never get the truth about anything, because neither of them would recognize it.We think wehave problems now ..."we ain't seen nothin' yet!" Heaven help us.
76 agree | 91 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The only reason that the previous poster can claim "innuendo" is because Berger stole and destroyed original documents of which no copies were made. Is it a common practice to use scissors on documents from the National Archives? What could possibly be the explanation besides a coverup? Sadly, Berger and the Clinton's have seriously harmed the United States since we didn't have all the facts about 9/11 because someone destroyed documents. How ANYONE can support someone involved in that act, or a campaign that associates with such people is beyond me.
100 agree | 96 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Sandy Berger is an intelligent, experienced, fine, upright citizen, who made a mistake. The content of the articles are just innuendo. This a country of second chances. Bravo for Hillary. She deserves the best advice she can get. She should be applauded for giving Mr. Berger another chance.
102 agree | 106 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Whether discussing the missing Rose records, the funds obtained through the Chinese or any other foreigners, the Monica lies or the many other scandals of the '90's, the Clintons gather low life scumbags around them like flies. People of poor character are forced to sourround themselves with trash because reputable people will have nothing to do with them. And neither will thinking Americans in 2008.
127 agree | 105 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Jerry Houpt said:
Berger should be in jail!
110 agree | 108 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
There are too many criminals in DC; the worst of which are in the Pentagon; 2nd worst: the White House.
108 agree | 111 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
He's no advisor, any more than anyone else that happens to know the candidate personally. He's not paid by them, not on the roster of official representatives of the campaign - none of it. You have the nerve to make up this stuff on the thinnest of perceptable connections, spin it into something that's not at all true, then broadcast it as loudly as possible like it's really a big deal, all the while ignoring the convicted criminals associated with the GOP newsmakers of the day. THIS kind of spin-doctor false-indignation 'reporting' is why the right wing is losing it's base, after having lost the average American. When are you wingnuts going to stop with all this insanity and get real? Good grief, buy a vowel or something - get a clue! B.T.W., I used to be a Conservative Republican, but in the words of Reagan - I didn't leave my party - they left me. I can't support the unsupportable any longer. Good luck with your continued demagoguery.
114 agree | 140 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
DC Hendricks, Kansas said:
If the Clintons had hired some contract thug to break into the Archives to steal the papers, the culprit would be in Leavenworth today. Why so lenient on Berger? He is now a convicted felon and should be doing time. Hillary is showing her blatant arrogance and disregard for federal laws and common decency by ignoring the crime and placing Berger out front and visible in her campaign. "If you don't like to too bad...we're the Clintons!" The Billary see themselves as above the bounds of regular citizens. There must have been desperate reasons for Berger to take such a risk in the first place. Maybe he had assurance going in that he would be protected in his felonious acts, and in fact be rewarded. Where is the outrage in the press? Can the Clintons and their stooges get away with all of this? Apparently so, and it disgusts me.
124 agree | 119 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I think that the punishment should fit the crime. Until he returns the documents that he stole he should not receive a security clearance or be allowed to work at any job funded by the taxpayers. If Hillary or Bill want to support him out of their own newly deep pockets that is up to them. But everybody should know that they are the ones responsible for his actions.
138 agree | 115 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Maybe she's just following the example set by President Bush. I found this on Wikipedia about Elliot Abrams: During Bush's first term, he was appointed Special Assistant to the President. At the start of Bush's second term, Abrams was promoted to Deputy National Security Advisor for Global Democracy Strategy. Although Abrams is considered a leading neoconservative, his appointment by Bush was controversial due to his conviction in 1991 on two misdemeanor counts of unlawfully withholding information from Congress during the Iran-Contra Affair investigation. The special prosecutor prepared multiple felony counts against Abrams but never indicted him. Instead, Abrams entered into a plea agreement that ultimately led to a conviction without imprisonment on two misdemeanors of withholding information from Congress. He was fined $50, placed on probation for two years, and later pardoned by President Bush.
115 agree | 129 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Uncle Bob said:
This is payment from Bill Clinton for Burgers Theft Of the documents.So Slick Willy could rewright history
124 agree | 114 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
What do you mean by advisor? Does she pay him? Do they have scheduled meetings where they discuss her policies? Did the Examiner do any investigation of this at all? Doesn't look like it. Real neswpapers print facts not rumors.
186 agree | 126 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Again, experience does not equal good judgement. Hillary will be defeated by the republican. Demoncrats, please put on your thinking cap.
149 agree | 127 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
H. Speizer said:
This is the most negative thing by far that has happened in her campaign. She needs to apologize to her supporters and disassociate herself from him. Just a plain terrible mistake. She could end up being her own worst enemy.
112 agree | 113 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Joel Ariel said:
Berger being re-called to duty by the Clintons side is as predictable as the sun rising in the East. His inability to secure a security clearance will not be a problem. Bill clinton had possible hundreds of persons who could never file an honest and complete SF-86 and have it passed by a granting authority. Look for Jaime Guralnik of pre 9/11 "The Intelligence Sharing Wall" infamy to join the NY Senator's staff of advisors soon. Did I say despicable? Well, I did not have to, did I?
130 agree | 114 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Sandy B. teaming up with Hillary C. will bring more awareness to the voters about these two lying dirt-bags. So it is fine with me.
109 agree | 130 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Vintage Hillary - Reward friends, no matter how corrupt. Circle the wagons, blame all manner of outside conspiracies. How Nixonian of her!
126 agree | 101 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Looks like Billary still has a lot of debts to repay... scary!
122 agree | 121 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Why should this be a surprise--she's been consorting with one who lied before the Grand Jury for years.
168 agree | 106 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The Clintons continue to show their arrogance and total disregard for the law and the citizens of this nation. To my mind, Bill and Hillary are criminals pure and simple, hell-bent for power. They never apologize or show contrition for their misdeeds. I say shame on you, Hillary, shame on you, William Jefferson. They nauseate me.
141 agree | 115 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
chas said:
This is about what I would expect. He didn't steal from the Archives for personal reasons, it was for the Clinton's. What amazes me is that she thinks the public is too stupid to see it, any maybe she is right.
112 agree | 108 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The sob should be in prison. Bush didn't even have the balls to go after him, it's hard to trust anyone in goverment now days,but especially on the left. Remember it's all about the money,don't forget to donate your hard earned income and i might add taxed way to high to the millionairs running for presidency.
128 agree | 123 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
birds of a feather sleep together
125 agree | 127 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Merle Phillips said:
I am not surprised that Hillary would employ a known thief and liar..."Birds of a feather..."
156 agree | 121 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Indicative of the type of thinking and decision making to be expected from another Clinton administration.
175 agree | 103 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
This is like asking Nixon to be a security staffer, methinks. The only thing he can teach a Clinton is how to shred papers.
156 agree | 115 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Ha, ha! The Rebublicans must have set this up!
117 agree | 113 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Hillary just found a bullet in her foot...gee, now how did that happen?
118 agree | 110 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Berger could be her choice for Sec. of State...what's next, Marc Rich for Treasury?
138 agree | 142 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Why would anyone be surprised at what the lying Clintons do. They think they are above the law. Hope you all are ready for more of the same corrupt crap we had before when Bill was President.
120 agree | 103 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
This is one more indicator of how corrupt these politician are. A precursor to more archival theft or worse?
127 agree | 115 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Sandy Berger??? That socialist slob is chump change in the Clintonoid world. He wouldn't make the top 25 in the annals of Clintonian criminal lore. That is truly scary.
136 agree | 134 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Mark said:
How the Clinton scum get away with what they do is unreal. Scooter Libby gets set up for something the prosecuter knew wasn't him, and gets 5 years. Berger steals classified documents to protect the hillbilies from Arkansas before the 9/11 commission begins, and gets probation. Liberal or conservative, you can't possilby believe this country could stand another 4 -8 years of the Clintons.
127 agree | 122 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Not surprised at all. It's clear that a Clinton White House would be a continuation of the Bush White House. Certainly, if she would commit this staffing trick now, she will definitely commit it if she's president. This is the second offensive hiring as I'm aware of. I hope more comes to light before the first votes are cast in the primaries. Seems this isn't enough to get her supporters to reconsider.
183 agree | 111 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
i think you guys watch too much tv, do you believe in the boogy man too? oh wait... you guys listen to rush limbaugh too right? i bet you even believe that rush is serious when he's in one of his famous oxycontin induced rages? i guess you havent really heard that its entertainment... but back to hillary, so if we believe the clintons are this secret society, that sacrifices babies, and secretly head the american arm of the mafia; than i guess its just as plausible to believe that, the republicans and bush and their cohorts, are all gay bathroom stalkers, that paid off more than just the lobbiests, so they can take over the middle east for oil and little boys,,, BOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!
129 agree | 131 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Slowly but surely, with Ickes, Podesta, Soros and now Berger, the neo-stalin gang is coming back for more.
163 agree | 110 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
dano said:
This guy takes the cake(as well as any untouched documents) in temerity and audacity that has become the Clinton Trademark. I work in a a federal prison halfway house and we have many in house felons with more honesty class and decorum than this numbskull. Lord forbid that such as these become our keepers. AnotherOneBitesTheDust.com
117 agree | 125 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
It's funny that so many people bash Bush. Here we have another example of a politician who cannot be trusted. The Ten Commandments which the Clintons pretend to believe say "don't cheat on your wife" and "don't lie". They have this advice and ignore it. I'm not sure what commandment it is that says, "Don't invade Iraq. This is what the intelligence you have really means and if you invade that country, there will be a heavy price to pay." In other words, the clintons have guidance and ignore it. Bush had no guidance and maybe he made the wrong decision. Who's worse? The fool or the fool who disregards solid counsel? I'm going to say that the clinton's dishonesty is worse than Bush's bad decisions.
115 agree | 100 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The arrogance of the Clintons and who behave like the socialist Stalinists that they really are. How could America support a candidate such as Hillary???? She has no chance of winning in 2008 - thank God!!
109 agree | 96 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
force9 said:
...stalinist movement, Clintoids, will once again provide themselves all the benefits that being above the law affords. Benign criminality. Stalinism. What's the difference?
159 agree | 115 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Put the Prosecutor in jail. Why is Cheney, Rove and Bush not in prison? It is past time to put the crooks that are in office in prison.
112 agree | 135 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Former Air Force NCO said:
When I was in the USAF, I held a Top Secret Security Clearance with many caveats behind it. Each time I viewed a TS Document, the SSO briefed me that I would face a courts martial and a long stint at Ft Leavonworth if I disclosed to unauthorized individuals what I read or made copies of those documents unless they were numbered and returned as required by regulation. I can tell you unequivically - if I had stolen any documents, I would still be in Leavonworth today. Although I've been honarably discharged from the USAF for 20 years, I still keep the secrets I know but I was only a Non-Commissioned Officer (NCO) who understood his responsibilities and not Sandy Burglar. At the end of the day, Right is Right and Wrong is Wrong.
176 agree | 118 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Cheryl said:
Do you see people in this blog still bashing Bush? Thought this was about Clinton, but they just can't help themselves. When are they going to realize BUSH ISN'T RUNNING! H E L L O! So stupid! Don't have a single brain between them apparently. Their lives are going to be so empty when Bush leaves office. Whatever will they live for?
166 agree | 126 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Sandy Berger protected the Clintons from having the truth revealed...now they are paying him back...and will continue to do so. He knows too much. Plus, Hillary and Bill know that the news media won't dig too deep, if at all, because 90% of them are Democrats and they want the Clintons back in the White House. And the American people will pay the price for the lack of integrity exhibited by the Clintons and by the news media.
119 agree | 117 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The Clintons hired Sandy Burgler? And this suprises people? Would you expect anything less from a Democrat?
120 agree | 118 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Mr. Berger had his law license revoked, and he has to make money somewhere!! The Clintons OWE him, let's face it!
132 agree | 104 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree