California News

CBS2-KCAL - 1 hr 16 mins ago
Examiner.com - 1 hr 47 mins ago
CBS2-KCAL - 1 hr 51 mins ago

Multimedia News

Elections 2008: On the trail
20 photos
Demonstrators protest against Republican pres...
Future gadgets now
20 photos
A model demonstrates Nikon Media Port 'UP300'...
Hoops here it comes
20 photos
Detroit Shock forward Katie Smith, front, col...
Madonna starting to show her age
20 photos
Madonna performs in concert during her 'Stick...
Pool fashion gets weird
20 photos
Models wear creations by French fashion desig...

Van Ness rapid transit plan catching on

Oct 4, 2007 3:00 AM (370 days ago) by Alexandria Rocha, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: SAN FRANCISCO
One plan to ease traffic on Van Ness Avenue calls for dedicated bus lanes, ticket machines and a way for operators to control traffic signals.
(Cindy Chew/The Examiner)
One plan to ease traffic on Van Ness Avenue calls for dedicated bus lanes, ticket machines and a way for operators to control traffic signals.

SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - On average, it takes Muni buses 22 minutes to travel the length of Van Ness Avenue, according to city transportation planners. With about 80,000 commuters accessing the corridor each day, Van Ness Avenue, which doubles as U.S. Highway 101, is one of the most heavily congested stretches of road in San Francisco. As a result, public transit is slow and unreliable, transit experts say.

“You’re just as likely to wait two minutes for a bus as you are 10 minutes,” said Rachel Hiatt, a senior transportation planner with the San Francisco County Transportation Authority.

Along with Muni, which operates seven bus lines on Van Ness Avenue, the authority is proposing a new transportation system for the corridor that is meant to speed up transit. Called bus rapid transit, it would include bus-only lanes blocked from vehicle traffic, ticket-vending machines at new station platforms and technology that allows operators to control traffic lights to avoid delays.

While a similar project proposed for Geary Boulevard is meeting some neighborhood resistance, the Van Ness Avenue project is garnering support from people who want relief on the congested corridor.

This story continues below
Advertisement

The authority has proposed various configurations of the new system — some include dedicated bus lanes in the center of the corridor and others include them on the sides. Each proposal costs between $85 million to $90 million and would likely be funded through a combination of local and federal funds. The plan is to have a system in place by 2011.

The most popular scenario includes center bus lanes that are blocked off to vehicle traffic by two medians on both sides. Ralph Romberg, who lives on Van Ness Avenue near Pine Street, said such a design makes the most sense.

“The minute a truck pulls into the lane, it blocks the buses and traffic is choked off into one lane,” he said of the designs with side bus lanes.

While most scenarios would slow vehicle traffic because two lanes would be reserved for buses, the designs vary on parking impacts — one would create 25 more parking spaces and another would eliminate 36.

Bruce Tenner, who lives on Van Ness Avenue near Pacific Avenue and supports the project, is more concerned with the types of buses that will be used.

“I hope they’re going to use the new hybrids,” he said. “I hope they’re not going to use the plain, old, stinky 47-Van Ness buses we have now.”

The San Francisco County Transportation Authority is holding a public meeting on the Van Ness Avenue BRT project from 6 to 8 p.m. at its offices, 100 Van Ness Ave., 26th floor.

What is bus rapid transit?

A bus rapid transit, or BRT, system — as depicted in a preliminary rendering above — typically combines the features of rail systems with the flexibility and cost savings of bus lines. Key elements include:

» Buses typically operate in dedicated lanes blocked to vehicular traffic in order to speed up service.

» BRT services tend to operate faster than normal bus lines, as they are not delayed by vehicular traffic.

» Technology that allows operators to control traffic signal lights is often used to further reduce delay.

» Bus tickets can often be prepurchased at vending machines on station platforms, speeding the loading and unloading of passengers.

» BRT service can be set up on normal streets by simply changing the way lanes are configured.

- Source: San Francisco County Transportation Authority

Potrero, 19th avenues flagged as next candidates for speedy buses

While major studies to bring rapid bus systems to Geary Boulevard and Van Ness Avenue are under way, two other San Francisco corridors have been tagged as “strong potential candidates” for similar projects, according to a Muni report released this week.

Potrero Avenue, between Division and Cesar Chavez streets, and 19th Avenue in The City’s Sunset district could both stand “improved and faster transit service,” Muni’s Short-Range Transit Plan for 2008-2027 states.

Although the projects “are not on the fast track right now,” according to Muni spokeswoman Maggie Lynch, they have been highlighted as possibilities in the transit agency’s largest planning document.

Dubbed a death trap for walkers, 19th Avenue is part of Highway 1, which links Marin and San Mateo counties. The heavily congested corridor serves 85,000 vehicles, 80,000 pedestrians and 14,500 Muni riders each day.

The three bus lines that serve the corridor are forced to commingle with vehicle traffic, which causes delays. While 19th Avenue has been flagged as a possible light-rail route, a more immediate solution would be a bus rapid transit system costing about $239 million, according to a 2002 Muni report.

BRT systems include dedicated lanes for transit and give buses priority at signals.

Along the eastern side of the Mission district, Potrero Avenue between Division and Cesar Chavez streets consists mostly of four lanes of through traffic. A BRT system along this corridor would connect to the proposed Van Ness Avenue rapid bus project, turning Potrero Avenue into a “major transit thoroughfare” in The City, according to the new report.

A BRT system on Potrero Avenue is projected to cost about $42 million, the 2002 report states.

arocha@examiner.com

Voice your opinion and vote in our poll at examiNation SF: How do you feel about blocking traffic for bus-only lanes?

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

2:42 PM MST on Thu., Oct. 4, 2007 re: "Van Ness rapid transit plan catching on"

Examiner Reader said:
How about a BRT system up 101 starting near the Golden Gate Bridge all the way to Santa Rosa? (and beyond) Use the railroad right-of-way the runs along side 101 for some parts of it.

122 agree | 117 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

11:25 AM MST on Thu., Oct. 4, 2007 re: "Van Ness rapid transit plan catching on"

Examiner Reader said:
The heavily users of the buses on the Van Ness corridor during morning rush hour and mid-afternoon are the students attending Galileo and Sacred Heart High Schools as well as those riding the 49 bus to the Mission...I think those riders would benefit the most fom the Van Ness plan...provided they board the front door and pay for their ride for a change.

121 agree | 128 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:43 AM MST on Thu., Oct. 4, 2007 re: "Van Ness rapid transit plan catching on"

Examiner Reader said:
What about expanding underground muni? Taking away lanes on an already busy street doesn't seem that intuitive. Adding an underground line from the Civic Center station up to the Marina, and one from Montgomery to North Beach, does. How come no politician never voices this idea? It's not exactly revolutionary.

125 agree | 106 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement