California News

Los Angeles Times - 29 mins ago
CBS2-KCAL - 49 mins ago
Los Angeles Times - 1 hr 28 mins ago

S.F. Muni eyes makeover for risky stop

Oct 1, 2007 3:00 AM (341 days ago) by Alexandria Rocha, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: SAN FRANCISCO
Muni riders navigate between parked cars as they enter and exit a Metro train at the stop at Cole and Carl streets. The agency is looking at ways to improve access to metro trains at the intersection.
(Jason Steinberg/Special to The Examiner)
Muni riders navigate between parked cars as they enter and exit a Metro train at the stop at Cole and Carl streets. The agency is looking at ways to improve access to metro trains at the intersection.

SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - On the way to Ocean Beach, Muni’s outbound N-Judah trains emerge from the Sunset Tunnel at Carl and Cole streets and come to a brisk stop — it is the busiest passenger loading and unloading zone for the metro trains outside of downtown San Francisco and Muni wants to revamp it to increase pedestrian safety and access.

In the last five years, there have been 10 accidents involving trains and vehicles and one accident involving a train and a pedestrian at the stop at Carl and Cole streets, according to Muni officials who recently met with concerned neighbors and N-Judah riders about the bustling intersection.

While no decisions have been made, Muni is proposing to relocate the stops for both inbound and outbound N-Judah trains for better access, while also building boarding platforms, corner bulb outs and curb ramps.

“It’s really important we address pedestrian safety,” said Julie Kirschbaum, manager of Muni’s Transit Effectiveness Project, the first in-depth analysis of the system done in more than two decades and meant to increase system reliability, on-time performance and passenger satisfaction.

This story continues below
Advertisement

Transit planners for Muni, which serves nearly 700,000 weekday riders on 1,000 buses, streetcars and trolleys, also want to replace dilapidated phone booths, trashcans and transit shelters at the intersection and add a ticket-vending machine to speed up the boarding process.

Currently, N-Judah trains — Muni’s most popular metro line carrying as many as 40,000 people each weekday — compete with drivers who double park on Carl Street near the western portal of the Sunset Tunnel.

A perforated white line is meant to keep drivers from blocking the space that train operators need to clear the corner out of the tunnel, but drivers ignore the road rule all too often, which delays the trains, said Javad Mirabdal, head of Muni’s transit preferential streets program.

Passengers boarding the outbound trains also have to navigate the illegally parked cars, which is not a “safe and comfortable environment” for riders, Mirabdal said.

“It sounds great, but nowhere in here did I hear more trains,” said Bradley Burch, an N-Judah rider who attended the Muni meeting on Carl and Cole streets last week. “Most people in here want more trains to get downtown faster.”

Muni officials said the N-Judah line receives more trains than any other metro route.

arocha@examiner.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

1:06 PM MST on Tue., Oct. 2, 2007 re: "S.F. Muni eyes makeover for risky stop"

Kezar Trainer said:
Here are a couple of suggestions: Faster trains = more trains so... 1. Get rid of the two meters blocking the outbound carl and cole platform. Build the platform out to where the train goes. This is totally obvious and is a lot cheaper than moving the platform. 2. Ticket machines are a good idea. 3. Stop lights with Transit Priority.... Why do we have $300,000 trains sitting at stop signs? 4. Turn the AC on the trains off after after 9PM if they are too loud - but seriously guys, i live on Geary and the 38 is a lot louder than the N.

174 agree | 88 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

3:19 PM MST on Mon., Oct. 1, 2007 re: "S.F. Muni eyes makeover for risky stop"

Examiner Reader said:
One way of lessening the noise and vibration on the N line is to have just one train car running rather than two attached together. Idea would probably work best during off-peak hours like after 9pm.

149 agree | 105 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:48 PM MST on Mon., Oct. 1, 2007 re: "S.F. Muni eyes makeover for risky stop"

Examiner Reader said:
One can also say waiting for overcrowded trains is also one of the trade-offs of living in a vibrant and bustling neighborhood. You knew the trains were always infrequent and overcrowded. If you don't like it, then you can move too, N-Rider. Is it too much to ask for proper roadwork that absorbs the vibration, buying lighter trains with quieter air-conditioning systems, or tweaking the existing trains so that they are less noisy? Must the N-Judah be running until 2 in the morning when there is hardly any rider by 9pm? Do you have to be alway self-absorbed and always only concerned for yourself?

158 agree | 121 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:09 PM MST on Mon., Oct. 1, 2007 re: "S.F. Muni eyes makeover for risky stop"

Daily N Rider said:
What the N line needs are more trains during the height of morning and evening rush hours. The chief issue with the line is overcrowding, as anyone who waits at Carl/Cole in the morning can attest. And when it's that crowded, the cars HAVE to be air conditioned or you'll have people passing out. As for noise and rumbling? Welcome to the Big City. The tracks have existed along the Carl/Irving/Judah corridor for 80 years. Anyone moving into a house or apartment right on the line should expect train noise in addition to city noise, or should choose a different place to live. That's one of the tradeoffs for living in a vibrant city and bustling neighborhood instead of the burbs.

147 agree | 88 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:19 PM MST on Mon., Oct. 1, 2007 re: "S.F. Muni eyes makeover for risky stop"

N commuter victim said:
And the MUNI fiasco nightmare continues.

160 agree | 111 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:52 AM MST on Mon., Oct. 1, 2007 re: "S.F. Muni eyes makeover for risky stop"

Examiner Reader said:
And can't the trains be made quieter? Who's stupid idea was it to put a non-green-friendly LOUD air-conditioning system on these stupid N-Judah trains?!!! I can't even open my windows they're so loud, let alone get a good night's sleep!

168 agree | 112 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:52 AM MST on Mon., Oct. 1, 2007 re: "S.F. Muni eyes makeover for risky stop"

Examiner Reader said:
And can't the trains be made quieter? Who's stupid idea was it to put a non-green-friendly LOUD air-conditioning system on these stupid N-Judah trains?!!! I can't even open my windows they're so loud, let alone get a good night's sleep!

150 agree | 101 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:50 AM MST on Mon., Oct. 1, 2007 re: "S.F. Muni eyes makeover for risky stop"

Examiner Reader said:
here's a solution. . . why not put a traffic light on that intersection? that will prevent vehicular accidents. duh! as for pedestrian accidents, you life is not worth losing by chasing after a bus to get to a job. use some common sense! muni needs to be overhauled from top to bottom. it's obvious muni director and management are out of touch and haven't been riding the ENTIRE N-train line since they feel they're doing an adaquate job. make them stand on cole st during rush hour and try to get on the train!

137 agree | 118 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:43 AM MST on Mon., Oct. 1, 2007 re: "S.F. Muni eyes makeover for risky stop"

Examiner Reader said:
Better NOT be more trains until there is a subway system to accommodate it...I live on Irving and the trains roaring by is excruciating as it is from 4:30AM to 2AM ...The Carl/Irving corridor is NOT a subway tunnel! People live here, folks. Give us a break, will yeah? The city can at least spend a little money to fortify the road and patch up all the pot holes so that my house doesn't SHAKE all the time a train passes by.

168 agree | 109 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:28 AM MST on Mon., Oct. 1, 2007 re: "S.F. Muni eyes makeover for risky stop"

Examiner Reader said:
So 40,000 per day times 5 years is 73Million people, there is ONE accident involving a pedestrian and they want to adjust the system? One wonders how many millions will be spent.

143 agree | 113 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement