California News

Bush, Congress clash over program funding

Sep 21, 2007 12:00 AM (350 days ago) by Susan Ferrechio, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: WASHINGTON

WASHINGTON (Map, News) - President Bush positioned himself Thursday for a showdown with Congress, threatening to veto a children’s health insurance bill that has significant Republican support in both the House and Senate.

Both chambers are expected next week to increase the appropriation for the State Children’s Health Insurance Program from $25 billion to $60 billion. The program is aimed at children who do not qualify for Medicare.

The money would pay for insuring 3.3 million children beyond the 6.6 million already enrolled and also preserve coverage for 660,000 who would have lost it under current funding levels. The bill also would provide funds for states to seek out eligible children who are not now covered and pay bonuses to states that increase the number of their SCHIP enrollees.

The expansion of the program would occur over five years and would be funded in part by a 61-cent increase in the cigarette tax.

This story continues below
Advertisement

Bush said the plan backed by Congress is far too expensive. He said it would cover children well above the poverty level and prompt many to give up private insurance and enter the federal program.

Bush has called for an increase of $5 billion over five years.

“Democratic leaders in Congress want to put more power in the hands of government by expanding federal health care programs,” Bush said during a news conference. “Their SCHIP plan is an incremental step toward the goal of government-run health care for every American.”

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said the bill would not expand eligibility, but simply provide more money for those who qualify but are not using the program. She called Bush's veto threat “a poor choice.”

Bush will likely prevail in blocking the legislation in the House, where supporters lack the two-thirds vote needed to override a veto.

But Bush faces the prospect of a political embarrassment in the Senate, where there is enough support to block a veto.

“I believe such a veto would be a terrible mistake,” said Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine. “If he does proceed to veto it, I will vote to override his veto. Surely this bill has a track record of making a real difference in low income working families.”

Funding for SCHIP expires Sept. 30. Assuming Bush follows through on his veto threat, Congress will have to pass a short-term measure until supporters can craft legislation more palatable to the President or to House Republicans.

House Minority Leader John A. Boehner, R-Ohio, associated the bill with the failed attempt by then-first lady Hillary Clinton to reform health care during her husband's first administration.

“This is ‘Hillarycare’ cloaked in expanded children's health care,” Boehner said. “That's not what most members want.”

sferrechio@dcexaminer.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

6:09 AM MST on Thu., Oct. 4, 2007 re: "Democrats move to override veto of children’s health care measure"

Art B said:
Bush is right. The social security entitlement is broke. The medicare entitlement is broke. So lets create another one, which will soon be broke. We never hear anything about how much this will cost (clue -- lots). There arent enough smokers to pay for it and even if there were, what did they do to deserve this kind of punishment? How many non-payers will get "equal" benefits (I suppose they consider "parents" income to decide who pays, since ALL children are not able to pay by definition). The principal of all govt aid is that the more you "have", the less you "get". So to "get" the most, you need to appear to "have" nothing. What incentive is there for folks to get an education, work hard, and save their money for a better life if its just going to be taken from them and given to folks who have not done these things? Communism 101.

173 agree | 169 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Advertisement