Meet the new administration, senators and members of congress and how they plan to affect change.

Los Angeles Examiners

Kevin Allen
L.A. Political Satire Examiner
Most Recent Article
Obama vs. Hitler: The debate rages on...
Hunter Stiebel
L.A. Political Examiner
Most Recent Article
A California Election Day Prop. Cheat Sheet
 
 

Multimedia News

Grammy Nominations Concert highlights
20 photos
Christina Aguilera arrives at 'The Grammy Nom...
Rockefeller Center Christmas tree lights up
20 photos
People look on from office windows as the Roc...
Celestial love triangle
20 photos
The crescent moon is accompanied by planets V...
Britney's back with new album, tour
20 photos
Singer Britney Spears performs on ABC's 'Good...
World AIDS Day: Observing a global epidemic
20 photos
Children from the Andile School choir sing du...

Gates warns Congress not to micromanage military

Sep 16, 2007 9:39 AM (445 days ago) by Rowan Scarborough, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: WASHINGTON
Defense Secretary Robert Gates warned Congress not to micromanage the U.S. military.
(File photo)
Defense Secretary Robert Gates warned Congress not to micromanage the U.S. military.
WASHINGTON (Map, News) - Defense Secretary Robert Gates warned Congress Friday against meddling in the complex process of rotating troops in and out of Iraq, saying such micromanagement "would further stress the force and reduce its combat effectiveness."

Gates fired the salvo on the eve of an historic debate in Congress this month on whether to continue funding the Iraq war, which costs taxpayers $10 billion each month.

"The complexity of managing the flow of units, individuals and capabilities to two active combat theaters is enormous and does not lend itself to simplistic or to simple legislative prescriptions," Gates told reporters at the Pentagon.

The defense secretary took aim at an amendment from Sen. James Webb, D-Va. It would mandate that units spend at least as much time at their home base as they spend deployed.

This story continues below
Advertisement

Gates said the bill would force "gaps in capability" because there would be no unit with enough rest time to immediately replace exiting troops.

Army units are now deploying for 15 months in Iraq and Afghanistan, with only one year back home.

President Bush announced Thursday he had endorsed a pullback of up to 30,000 troops by July 2008 to bring the U.S. force level in Iraq to around 132,000.

But Democratic leaders say the troops were part of a five-brigade reinforcement scheduled to leave anyway. They are pushing for legislation that would have most troops out by the end of 2008.

Sen. John Warner, R-Va., ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, wants Bush to bring home troops, 5,000 at a time, as a message of unhappiness with Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki.

Marine Gen. Peter Pace, who leaves office next month as Joint Chiefs chairman, rebutted press reports that said senior commanders differed with Gen. David Petraeus, the top commander in Iraq, over troop cuts.

Pace said there was "unanimity amongst the eight four-star officers" who made recommendations to Bush. The eight are Petraeus; Navy Adm. William Fallon, the head of U.S. Central Command; and the six Joint Chiefs.

Gates said he hopes the remaining 15 brigades can be reduced to 10, for a total of about 100,000 troops in Iraq, by January 2009. Petraeus is due to present his next assessment in March 2008.

"There's no way in a fight like this to be able to guarantee other than that there are some tough work still ahead of us," Pace said.

rscarborough@dcexaminer.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

10:49 AM MST on Tue., Jun. 3, 2008 re: "Gates wins no promises on Asia trip for help on Afghanistan"

Examiner Reader said:
face it robert! other countries are wise to us. its only the citizens of the u s that cant figure out how to pull the wool off our eyes. the so called terrorists dont have to attack us again.were perfectly capable of destroying ourselves with our own govt. and BORROWING banking system. i hear you can get last years potatoes down at the food share for .08 cent dollars.

4 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

9:15 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 19, 2007 re: "US Military Action Last Resort in Iran"

Examiner Reader said:
Laughable, really. For over three years we've heard nothing but empty threats. The US is in no position to open another front in the region. Any strike on Iran will result in all out war. There is offcourse the talk of shock and awe, but the US better be ready to recieve some shock itself.

152 agree | 157 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:02 PM MST on Mon., Jun. 4, 2007 re: "Gates Warns Turkey Not to Invade Iraq"

turkish army was formed 209 b.c! said:
how can we ignore the pkk terror? we are in war with terror! how can we ignore the 35.000 turkish victims? what about russia, iran and china? what about the evil terror?! they are our allies and they fight against terror! please america dont do suicide.

144 agree | 150 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement