Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - With Danville residents Sam Keller and Kyle Wright starting at quarterback for national powers Nebraska and Miami (Fla.), respectively, and Salesian High School of Richmond graduate Jahvid Best electrifying fans as a dynamic freshman running back at Cal, it’s clear to see that Bay Area high schools have a bevy of talented football players ready to perform on a national collegiate level.
But it’s not just the local high schools in the Bay Area that are producing droves of Division I players. The nearby community colleges, including City College of San Francisco and the College of San Mateo, have been equally instrumental in breeding talented athletes for Division I programs — but only recently have the big-time Bay Area schools taken notice.
“There has been national awareness about our program for a while,” said CCSF coach George Rush, whose 2006 team featured 20 players who moved up to Division I-A or I-AA schools. “But it wasn’t until Jeff Tedford arrived at Cal did we really have the local Pac-10 schools looking at us. Jeff did a tremendous job of changing the perceived image of what a junior college football player is supposed to be.”
Since arriving in Berkeley in 2002, Tedford has rung up a career record of 45-20, due in large part to the talents of community college transfers, including two from CCSF — quarterback Joe Ayoob and linebacker Desmond Bishop, a 2007 draft pick of the Green Bay Packers.
And while not quite on the national awareness level as Cal, San Jose State, led by third-year coach Dick Tomey, has also benefited greatly from the influx of transfers.
Leaning heavily on the talents of juco players (the Spartans have 22 JC transfers on their roster, including three from CSM), Tomey helped engineer a six-game turnaround from 2005 to ’06, resulting in the Spartans’ first bowl appearance since 1990.
Whereas Tedford and Tomey have dipped frequently into the pool of athletes in the local community colleges, Stanford has neglected to take part in that recruiting process.
“I’m not sure if it’s academic elitism or whatever, but Stanford just doesn’t have the belief that community college kids can handle the rigors of their classes,” Rush said.
He cited an instance in which Stanford showed no interest in then-CCSF quarterback Zac Lee, despite having high SAT scores while studying at St. Ignatius High School. He ended up at Nebraska, backing up Keller.
Tedford said recruiting jucos has been a win-win situation.
“Our community college players have helped us out tremendously here,” Tedford said. “It’s not just on the field, either. They’re succeeding academically and they’ve got outstanding character. All of the community college transfers we’ve had here have been great guys.”
One of those “great guys” Tedford cites is Lavelle Hawkins, a senior wide receiver who suited up for CCSF for a year in 2004 — an experience he credits with preparing him for the big-time athletics of Division I football.
“It was a huge help playing at CCSF and lining up against some D-I opponents every week,” said Hawkins, who leads the Bears with 12 catches for 133 yards and passed the 1,000-yard mark for his career last weekend. “It did take about a year to get adjusted to all the different plays they have at Cal, but as far as the academics and everything else, it was the same as always for me — you just gotta stay focused and make sure you take care of your business.”
The three Bay Area Division I football teams vary greatly in how they use junior college transfers.
Coach: Jim Harbaugh
Juco transfers on roster: 0
Coach: Jeff Tedford
Juco transfers on roster: 9
Coach: Dick Tomey
Juco transfers on roster:22
Junior colleges such as CCSF and CSM offer a path to better opportunities for football players.
» MONDAY: The history behind CCSF and CSM
» TUESDAY: Junior college provides second chances
» WEDNESDAY: Plethora of teams means state stands alone
» TODAY: How do the big boys use jucos?
» FRIDAY: Making it all the way to the NFL



Comments from Examiner Readers
7:15 AM MST on Mon., Sep. 24, 2007 re: "Is this the beginning of the end?"
Report as inappropriate
6:11 PM MST on Fri., Sep. 21, 2007
re: "Bay Area schools only now tapping pipeline"
Report as inappropriate
12:48 PM MST on Fri., Sep. 14, 2007
re: "Bay Area schools only now tapping pipeline"
Report as inappropriate
7:04 AM MST on Wed., Aug. 22, 2007
re: "Terps QB situation unsettled"
Report as inappropriate
1:54 PM MST on Tue., Aug. 21, 2007
re: "Terps QB situation unsettled"
Report as inappropriate
10:44 AM MST on Mon., Aug. 20, 2007
re: "Navy mulls potential conference move"
Report as inappropriate
5:07 PM MST on Fri., Aug. 17, 2007
re: "Navy mulls potential conference move"
Report as inappropriate
12:46 PM MST on Fri., Aug. 17, 2007
re: "Navy mulls potential conference move"
Report as inappropriate
6:06 AM MST on Fri., Aug. 17, 2007
re: "Navy mulls potential conference move"
Report as inappropriate
7:11 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 16, 2007
re: "Navy mulls potential conference move"
Report as inappropriate
6:24 AM MST on Thu., Aug. 16, 2007
re: "Navy mulls potential conference move"
Report as inappropriate
5:01 AM MST on Thu., Aug. 16, 2007
re: "Navy mulls potential conference move"
Report as inappropriate
4:55 AM MST on Thu., Aug. 16, 2007
re: "Navy mulls potential conference move"
Report as inappropriate
9:25 PM MST on Wed., Aug. 15, 2007
re: "Navy mulls potential conference move"
Report as inappropriate
5:44 PM MST on Wed., Aug. 15, 2007
re: "Navy mulls potential conference move"
Report as inappropriate
3:46 PM MST on Wed., Aug. 15, 2007
re: "Freshmen could play critical role for Midshipmen"
Report as inappropriate
10:47 AM MST on Wed., Aug. 15, 2007
re: "Navy mulls potential conference move"
Report as inappropriate
10:43 AM MST on Wed., Aug. 15, 2007
re: "Navy mulls potential conference move"
Report as inappropriate
10:18 AM MST on Mon., May. 14, 2007
re: "Recruits ready to make commitments official"
Report as inappropriate
10:52 AM MST on Tue., May. 1, 2007
re: "Logan-El headed to Towson"
Report as inappropriate
7:56 AM MST on Sat., Apr. 21, 2007
re: "Transfer springs to action for depleted Terps"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
Ryan for the Heisman! Go BC!
292 agree | 309 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
nice Stadium but wheres the team? said:
Stanforrd lost their best hoops coach in the late 80's due to the school's inability to admit legitimate recruits that where academically eligible. now as i look at that joke of a football squad they run out there year in and year out i wonder why they dont recruit the best talent around. ccsf would give the cardinal a run for their money right now. jimmy vegas says ccsf (+7).
279 agree | 283 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
moreNcsarecoming said:
Joe Ayoob...enough said. Loved Hawkins comment about the education at CCSF and Berkley. Same as usual or something like that. No wonder Stanford doesn't want JC players - or Berkley ones!
298 agree | 296 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Terps Who?? said:
Doesn't matter because on September 1, you go down to the Villanova Wildcats!!!
296 agree | 294 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Josh POrtis is by far the best option at QB for the Terps. I've seen all three throughout the summer and Steffy knows the offense more but is just plain limited in ability. Turner is a bookworm with signal calling but is only good on the field between the 20's. He can't complete drives. Portis has trumendous athletic ability and instincts and a trumendous arm for such a shifty signal caller. He is your long term solution to get Maryland where they need to go. Steffy and Turner guaruntee you a .500 mediocre season....bet that!
390 agree | 286 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I agree with the posters above. The implication that the ACC is superior at all, much less far superior to the Big East (as things currently stand), is completely BANANAS and undermines the credibility of this otherwise well written piece, IMHO. The ACC hasn't won a BCS game since 1999 whereas the Big East was 32-8 OOC last year and has won its past two BCS games.
334 agree | 217 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
So ACC teams are superior to Navy, while you imply that Big East teams are not? Navy would be ranked 8th or 9th in a nine-team Big East. Remember, Navy lost by 1 point to Boston College, and by 34 to Rutgers. Geeze...
265 agree | 257 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Let's forget for a second that I'm an angry Big East fan. Boston College, who finished second in the Atlantic Division of the ACC (right behind Wake) needed a last-second lucky turnover and field goal with no time left to beat Navy (BY ONE POINT!!!) in their bowl game this past year. Where do you get off saying "The ACC is filled with football teams superior to Navy's." ???
307 agree | 324 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
That comment about the ACC being better than the BE is ludicrous. How long does the BE have to be better before people wake up. Without going into top-bottom details wouldn't the fact that the BE top teams beat the ACC top teams in 2 bowl games last year be enough to spur you to at least do a little research? The ACC and Big 12 were clearly the worst 2 conferences last year - it is not even debateable. If you look at all OOC results and work your way from top to bottom (Sagarin rankings). The BE had a .500 winning @ against teams ranked in the top 47. For the ACC to reach a .500 winning % you have to include teams all the way down to 119! Please do a little research.
347 agree | 254 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I echo what the first poster said. What cave have you been living in for the past two years, Mr Snyder? Do you REALLY think the ACC is superior to the Big East in football? How much did John Swofford pay you to put that paragraph in there?
359 agree | 208 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
"The Atlantic Coast Conference is filled with football teams superior to Navy’s." Huh? If the Big East were a viable option, why wouldn't the ACC? Check out the Big East/ACC head-to-head match ups from last season.
352 agree | 326 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
As a Navy fan, i certainly dont want to be in a confernce with the likes of toledo, kent st, and buffalo. I'd rather hold the course were on right now..ask army, they bolted cusa........
283 agree | 255 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Airforce is that good?........since when????
299 agree | 258 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Andrew C. Dahmen said:
Army and Navy should join the Sun Belt conference, Army could join the MAC. It will not happen however what would be great is to have Air Force in the same conference as Army and Navy, the Sun Belt would work but Air Force is way to good.
310 agree | 283 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
NIU Huskie said:
Navy should secure a tie-in with the MAC. MAC teams aren't that far away and there are two (Temple and Buffalo) that are closer than the Sun Belt schools. The Sun Belt's #2 school wouldn't be a very competitive or interesting (national TV crowd) game.
351 agree | 245 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
If the QB spot has consistency and the defensive backfield learns quickly, Navy will have an excellent year.
269 agree | 282 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
One potential short-term answer for Navy is a playing in a new bowl game in Baltimore in December of 2008. The Camden Yards Sports and Entertainment Commission considers Navy a prime candidate for the game, according to Wayne Edwards, the commission’s sports committee chairman. Sign an agreement with the Sun Belt for their 3'rd place team to play the Navy annually. Good deal for both.
426 agree | 309 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The Sun Belt would be perfect. The Navy and Sun Belt are recruiting comparable players today and have two bowl committments. 1) The New Orleans Bowl, 2) A second Bowl has been added effective 2009. The Sun Belt is making a major push to upgrade it conference. Over the next few years we will see an increased number of OOC wins. Sounds like a win-win situation.
259 agree | 366 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Kyle Barker from CCSF won't be going anywhere because he didn't make grades in the spring.
500 agree | 421 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Go Tigers
495 agree | 492 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I live locally and have been attending some of the practices. Josh Portis is the best fit for our offense I've watched this kid and he is everything folks have said he is. Go Terps.
553 agree | 453 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree