Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
BALTIMORE (Map, News) - In the end, how votes were cast in the city’s mayoral primary came down to a tale of two cities.
For those who believed Baltimore was moving in the right direction, Mayor Sheila Dixon invariably got their vote. But voters worried about crime, gangs and policing tended to favor Keiffer Mitchell Jr.
Either way, the extremely low turnout — about 80,000 residents cast ballots on Tuesday — meant just a handful of the city’s electorate chose Baltimore’s next mayor. (Click here for election results by precinct.)
“I think she has a done a good job so far,” said Dixon voter Susie Noonon, a Fells Point resident and retired teacher. “Education is the key, and she has the background for it.”
But another Fells Point resident, Mark Lardner, said he felt Mitchell would clean up City Hall.
“Property taxes are killing us,” he said. “He proposed lowering them as city councilman, so I support him now.”
At polling places around the city, officials and campaign workers were left standing idly by as voters trickled in one at a time.
“We usually have 20 or 30 people waiting outside when we open,” said Tim Dickey, an election judge in East Baltimore.
“Education is key,” said LaShawn Bradley, who lives near Little Italy and said she was voting for all incumbents in a district that included City Councilman Bernard “Jack” Young.
“I’m used to them being in charge,” she said.
Josephine Mahoney, voting near Johns Hopkins University, felt Dixon had more experience. “She knows what she is doing; so far she hasn’t done a bad job,” she said.
Despite low turnout, the families of candidates were out. Nanette Mitchell, mother of Keiffer Mitchell Jr., worked the polls in Mount Vernon.
“It’s a proud moment for me. I’ve never been able to vote for my son before,” she said.
“But I’ve never seen turnout this low,” she said.
Ex-U.S. Sen. Paul Sarbanes — father of Michael Sarbanes, a candidate for City Council president — also was seen at the polls near Johns Hopkins.
Asked who he preferred in the three-way race against City Council President Stephanie Rawlings-Blake and City Councilman Kenneth Harris Sr., the elder Sarbanes was blunt.
“It shouldn’t be hard to figure out,” he said.
sjanis@baltimoreexaminer.com



Comments from Examiner Readers
6:31 PM MST on Fri., Sep. 14, 2007 re: "Pundits: Apathy stalls voter turnout"
Report as inappropriate
6:05 PM MST on Fri., Sep. 14, 2007
re: "Pundits: Apathy stalls voter turnout"
Report as inappropriate
9:58 AM MST on Fri., Sep. 14, 2007
re: "Primary voting tells a tale of two cities"
Report as inappropriate
2:52 PM MST on Thu., Sep. 13, 2007
re: "Pundits: Apathy stalls voter turnout"
Report as inappropriate
11:56 AM MST on Thu., Sep. 13, 2007
re: "Pundits: Apathy stalls voter turnout"
Report as inappropriate
10:00 AM MST on Thu., Sep. 13, 2007
re: "Pundits: Apathy stalls voter turnout"
Report as inappropriate
7:47 AM MST on Thu., Sep. 13, 2007
re: "Pundits: Apathy stalls voter turnout"
Report as inappropriate
7:45 AM MST on Thu., Sep. 13, 2007
re: "Pundits: Apathy stalls voter turnout"
Report as inappropriate
7:43 AM MST on Thu., Sep. 13, 2007
re: "Pundits: Apathy stalls voter turnout"
Report as inappropriate
7:08 AM MST on Thu., Sep. 13, 2007
re: "Primary voting tells a tale of two cities"
Report as inappropriate
5:09 AM MST on Thu., Sep. 13, 2007
re: "Pundits: Apathy stalls voter turnout"
Report as inappropriate
5:08 AM MST on Thu., Sep. 13, 2007
re: "Pundits: Apathy stalls voter turnout"
Report as inappropriate
5:03 AM MST on Thu., Sep. 13, 2007
re: "Primary voting tells a tale of two cities"
Report as inappropriate
4:17 AM MST on Thu., Sep. 13, 2007
re: "Primary voting tells a tale of two cities"
Report as inappropriate
6:24 PM MST on Wed., Sep. 12, 2007
re: "Primary voting tells a tale of two cities"
Report as inappropriate
5:38 PM MST on Wed., Sep. 12, 2007
re: "Primary voting tells a tale of two cities"
Report as inappropriate
3:49 PM MST on Wed., Sep. 12, 2007
re: "Primary voting tells a tale of two cities"
Report as inappropriate
2:03 PM MST on Wed., Sep. 12, 2007
re: "Primary voting tells a tale of two cities"
Report as inappropriate
1:47 PM MST on Wed., Sep. 12, 2007
re: "Primary voting tells a tale of two cities"
Report as inappropriate
10:58 AM MST on Wed., Sep. 12, 2007
re: "Primary voting tells a tale of two cities"
Report as inappropriate
6:36 AM MST on Wed., Sep. 12, 2007
re: "Primary voting tells a tale of two cities"
Report as inappropriate
6:12 AM MST on Wed., Sep. 12, 2007
re: "Primary voting tells a tale of two cities"
Report as inappropriate
5:27 AM MST on Wed., Sep. 12, 2007
re: "Primary voting tells a tale of two cities"
Report as inappropriate
2:34 PM MST on Tue., Sep. 11, 2007
re: "City gains few new voters"
Report as inappropriate
11:29 AM MST on Tue., Sep. 11, 2007
re: "Region waits for city race results and area impact"
Report as inappropriate
11:05 AM MST on Tue., Sep. 11, 2007
re: "Region waits for city race results and area impact"
Report as inappropriate
9:42 AM MST on Tue., Sep. 11, 2007
re: "Region waits for city race results and area impact"
Report as inappropriate
9:18 AM MST on Tue., Sep. 11, 2007
re: "City gains few new voters"
Report as inappropriate
7:47 AM MST on Tue., Sep. 11, 2007
re: "City gains few new voters"
Report as inappropriate
5:39 AM MST on Tue., Sep. 11, 2007
re: "City gains few new voters"
Report as inappropriate
5:35 PM MST on Mon., Sep. 10, 2007
re: "In the home stretch, candidates make their last bids for votes"
Report as inappropriate
1:37 PM MST on Mon., Sep. 10, 2007
re: "In the home stretch, candidates make their last bids for votes"
Report as inappropriate
12:53 PM MST on Mon., Sep. 10, 2007
re: "In the home stretch, candidates make their last bids for votes"
Report as inappropriate
8:38 AM MST on Mon., Sep. 10, 2007
re: "In the home stretch, candidates make their last bids for votes"
Report as inappropriate
6:25 AM MST on Mon., Sep. 10, 2007
re: "Baltimore City turnout may be the primary factor"
Report as inappropriate
6:05 AM MST on Mon., Sep. 10, 2007
re: "In the home stretch, candidates make their last bids for votes"
Report as inappropriate
2:58 AM MST on Mon., Sep. 10, 2007
re: "In the home stretch, candidates make their last bids for votes"
Report as inappropriate
2:13 AM MST on Mon., Sep. 10, 2007
re: "In the home stretch, candidates make their last bids for votes"
Report as inappropriate
10:48 PM MST on Sun., Sep. 9, 2007
re: "Baltimore City turnout may be the primary factor"
Report as inappropriate
2:25 PM MST on Sun., Sep. 9, 2007
re: "Baltimore City turnout may be the primary factor"
Report as inappropriate
10:12 AM MST on Sun., Sep. 9, 2007
re: "Baltimore City turnout may be the primary factor"
Report as inappropriate
5:10 PM MST on Sat., Sep. 8, 2007
re: "Voters say mayor’s race ignores critical issues"
Report as inappropriate
10:44 PM MST on Fri., Sep. 7, 2007
re: "Voters say mayor’s race ignores critical issues"
Report as inappropriate
10:29 PM MST on Fri., Sep. 7, 2007
re: "Baltimore City turnout may be the primary factor"
Report as inappropriate
6:45 PM MST on Fri., Sep. 7, 2007
re: "Voters say mayor’s race ignores critical issues"
Report as inappropriate
3:52 PM MST on Fri., Sep. 7, 2007
re: "Voters say mayor’s race ignores critical issues"
Report as inappropriate
3:48 PM MST on Fri., Sep. 7, 2007
re: "Voters say mayor’s race ignores critical issues"
Report as inappropriate
12:37 PM MST on Fri., Sep. 7, 2007
re: "Voters say mayor’s race ignores critical issues"
Report as inappropriate
12:36 PM MST on Fri., Sep. 7, 2007
re: "Baltimore City turnout may be the primary factor"
Report as inappropriate
11:24 AM MST on Fri., Sep. 7, 2007
re: "Baltimore City turnout may be the primary factor"
Report as inappropriate
Ashburton Resident said:
Dunn, I do not agree with you. Jill Carter's is the most significant loss to Baltimore City. She has the character, courage, and intelligence, to change the dirty politics of Baltimore and fix the city's long neglected problems. She experienced media blackout while they selected their candidates and steered voters away from her. Sarbanes, on the other hand, had the name, the money, and media on his side, and he could not pull off victory. He was a good candidate but he was no REAL agent of change, nor would he have really shaken things up. The tragedy, here, is the crushing defeat of Jill CARTER. The city may have to wait another 40 or 50 years to get someone of her caliber, who is electable, and who will stand up for what is right in the midst of powerful adversity.
141 agree | 98 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
you got your wish. ENJOY.
146 agree | 111 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
voters are stupid, its obvious from their comments
163 agree | 120 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Voter apathy is the media'sfault. Every day,all you saw were the two worst candidates with the worst records being promoted. Mitchell and Dixon were the least interestingcandidates ever. Jill Carter is charismatic and exciting. She had a strong message, but the media treated her like she was a Bob Kaufman. The media's sorry coverage of the candidates and the issues hurt voter turnout. Who would want to come out to vote for a choice between a liar and a thief?
171 agree | 127 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Dunn said:
Apathy, of course, did you see who was running this year? Sarbanes is the only one I am sorry to see lose. I realy wish newer residents of this city would vote. As it stands now, the ministers in the city mobilize their congregations and win. Whoever the ministers endorse win, simple as that. This was a very poor line up this year. I really wish the city wasn't so monopolized by democrates. This town could use some balance, fewer taxes, as well as some other changes that could happen if the city had two parties.
149 agree | 100 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
baltimore better pray and hope the nat. gard. will help pick up the slack northen dis. just lost 15 guys i dont know about the others but this is getting scary.
149 agree | 130 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I'll bet Dixson's Contractor friends are happy !!!!!
128 agree | 117 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
“It’s a tough question to answer why turnout was so low,” said veteran campaign worker Here is the answer......voters were afraid they would get shot !!!!!
156 agree | 118 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
@ Alice C. Dyson YOu are the problem. Lets elect a black woman and make history, no matter hoe corrupt and unqualified she is. YOu are an idiot for not electing a good mayor, and simply going for the 'black woman' Shame on you, Dixon is useless and Baltimore will continue to suffer. YOu are proud of this?
149 agree | 124 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I hope I can sale my place just to break even now! I think I would be better off renting in D.C. than owning in Baltimore...I see why all my friends told me I was crazy to actually move to Baltimore and not just invest. Buy and rent to Section 8 people they told me...don't live there...don't go there...just get your checks in the mail and forget about it, they said. Maybe I can turn my house into a group home and roll out, hmmmm, now there's an idea!
163 agree | 118 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I do not care one whit about voter apathy.
157 agree | 119 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Mr. Mirth Alert said:
No, it's not a tough question to answer, why voter turnout is so low: political office seekers are light years beyond anything voters can imagine. By the time these people announce their candidacies, they are bathing in an entourage of fundraisers, advisers, & just plain sycophants. You can bet that when the democratic process withers & croaks, no politician will suffer. The Mitchell campaign camp made a burlesque outta the primary, with its wailing about who owes whom what. I think it was the financier Paul Mellon who said that good govt. is good business. These days, bad govt. & bad business is good press, & really, that's all any of these politicos want.
142 agree | 121 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
It's sad when a primary election has become a general election. Where is the opposition? Could this be why the city of Baltimore is a joke?
175 agree | 115 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Jed said:
Call the National Guard , and lock down the city . No one leaves or enters. We must restore common sense . Rule of LAW must be restored. All lawyers must be recertified from an outside source. No excuses for anybody! Do it NOW!!
157 agree | 131 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Welcome to the first dictator state---O' don't blame me, I voted for Erhlich. More of the status quo and his cronies to keep his secrets safe. We will now be leaving Baltimore.
123 agree | 111 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Omalley has to fix the city with needed funds Derlick withheld, Sheila is endorsed and she will do the right things for Baltimore City!
161 agree | 110 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Now don't vote , if you do decide to vote in the big election , vote for the other opponent so that city hall will still be cleaned up.
158 agree | 100 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
ha ha ha were laughing at you baltimore
143 agree | 113 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
It's okay. Dixon and O'Malley are in charge. God help us.
149 agree | 106 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
sweetdyson@yahoo.com said:
this article is outstanding as far as it goes. I admire the mayor because she effectively held off all challengers who wanted what she had. Also I believe that a powerful woman has to fight like a man to stay in power. The mayor showed us how intelligently this can be done. Being a senior citizen, I remember when women did not have the right to have professions, or their own money . now I can look on the net and find volumes of black history. I am glad that I lived long enough to see all of this and to see the mayor accomplished the impossible. Alice C. Dyson baltimore, Md.
133 agree | 107 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Who the hell thinks Baltimore is going in the right direction with Dixon. I want to talk to you. Why did you vote for her? Baltimore is doomed and you idiots have sealed its fate. Shame. Carter should have won
123 agree | 118 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Expect a mass exodus for the people who are smart enough to leave. What will be left are all the fools who didn't vote and their foolish mayor!
156 agree | 108 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Concern Citizen of Baltimore said:
So, you think your scared to walk the streets NOW! Baltimore your going to get just what you deserve.
158 agree | 102 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
hey lets all move and let doc have the city with those he love's.
149 agree | 163 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
sue said:
To the poster who wrote "welcome to the jungle" I could not stop laughing. Maybe we could have t-shirts made ..I survived the jungle and sell them.
132 agree | 147 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
we in the outer county's should build a wall
137 agree | 131 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
So sad. If Dixon wins, all of the Welcome to Baltimore signs should be changed to Welcome to the Jungle. And the old Guns in Roses song, Welcome to the Jungle should be our theme song.
138 agree | 132 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
The Reason said:
Have to laugh at the "experts" who try to explain low voter registration and turnout. Perhaps the reason for low voter registration is due to the fact that people are leaving Baltimore City in droves. Who wants to live in a decaying, violent city? There's a former mayor and now current mayor who do NOTHING to fight violent criminals. There are judges that give lifetime criminals parole or reduced sentences, and what do they do? Go out and kill again. I think the law should be changed that if any perp get let out of jail early, or inspite of 10 other priors on his record, still gets probation, I think if that person goes out and commits another violent crime, the judge that released him should be arrested and go to jail. It's time for the few remaing citizens of this dead city to fight crime on their own because every one knows the politicans nor the judges do their part.
129 agree | 141 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
What sad state of affairs....each year it gets worse Federal, State, and Local...Just when you think it can't get any worse...it does.
136 agree | 144 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Nice. Maybe you would like a personal invitation to vote and a wake-up call too! What an irresponsible piece of work.
149 agree | 114 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I agree with the person who reconnizes that Mitchell is as much an O'Malley puppet as Dixon. At one of the first candidate forums, Mitchell answered almost every question with "I'll follow O'Malley's lead", or "I'll leave it up to the governor." It was only when Jill Carter broke out as the strong, independent voice of real leadership, that Mitchell changed his tune and began to emulate her. Too bad her campaign never took off.
158 agree | 107 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Not a Baltimoron like the others said:
Dixon is not even working on her campaign anymore. She is so confident that the Baltimorons are going to vote for her, that she is putting all her energy into Blake now. We are at 215 murders. I mean are people really that stupid to keep her in office?
157 agree | 181 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Super Reader said:
I hope the best person wins!!!
162 agree | 149 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Why does a story about mayoral hopefuls feature a photo of "Pot Bell" Mitchell?" Haven't we seen enough of the goof in the Sun? O'Malley will control the city under either Dixon or Mitchell, they've both put him first in the past. Mitchell begged him for the endorsement but he had to give it to Sheila to keep her quiet about all his shady dealings. She knows more b/c she sat with him on the BD of Estimates. Mitchell is a fake. He's just as corrupt.
165 agree | 158 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Dixon is the worse choice. Period! If you allow Dixon, Blake, and Jessamy to have power of the city. Expect complete disaster.
131 agree | 126 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Dead voters said:
I was wondering, just how do the democrats split the dead voter count?
151 agree | 118 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
vote for mitchell send a strong message to martin omalley,dont let him mayor this city ever again.if you vote dixon that is what you will be doing...you messed up making him govenor,now is your time to right a wrong vote smart vote mitchell..for gods sake people....i am,and so are my friends,,yours truly johnn
147 agree | 114 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I'm not voting for Mitchell or Dixon, that;s for sure. Mitchell is a fake. I hope voters can see past his empty rehtoric and big belly to the truth of his do nothing record for the past 12 years.
149 agree | 126 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Correction, Dixon is the thrid worst candidate. IMO, Mitchell is the worst candidate, a total phony. Schaefer is the second worst, a total flake. Dixon is the third worst candidate, but most likely to win.
131 agree | 130 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Dixon is the answer said:
She is the answer if the question is, "Who is the worst candidate for mayor of Baltimore?"
153 agree | 132 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Concern Citizen of Baltimore said:
Ladies and Gentlemen; We are in a state of crisis and emergency. Shelia Dixion is not the answer!
150 agree | 107 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
No one will vote for him. I have to admit, he came across a lot stronger than the school principal. Some of what Brown said was true and I like that someone said it.
148 agree | 128 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
johnn said:
does the voters know that philiph brown is a convited felon,and con man.and how is he able to get into this race....what a missed up city
145 agree | 156 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Great choices: an illiterate, Dixon; a dufus without a brain, Mitchell. A rebel we need but won't vote for, Carter; a slicktalking clueless bureaucrat, Bundley; a complete psycho, Brown; and a brilliant nut case, Kaufman. If she wins, the citizens of Baltimore should demand that Dixon pass elementary English.
134 agree | 137 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Not surprising. If you listen to the debates, Dixon and Mitchell consistently give the worst answers even though they are touted as the frontrunners. The best answers are considtenly given by Carter, Kaufman, Brown, and Bundley---in that order. The only one worse than Dixon is Schaefer.
150 agree | 150 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Dixon: "The State legislature Need", uh, that would be "needs", sheesh, and this woman was a teacher who now is mayor--no wonder the schools are so bad if this woman meets minimal standards. Poor Baltimore. And I'm not giving Mitchell a pass either. Is he deaf? He certainly failed to even remotely answer the question.
169 agree | 133 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Insurance is too high and discriminates against city residents because Mitchell and Dixon are in the pockets of the insurance companies, or else, they are incredibly stupid.
163 agree | 124 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
thats why baltimore is in the shape its in now. they want to keep someone in office who is greedy and dishonest .baltimore will have no one to blame if they elect dixon or mitchel. i think the worse comeing.and i am tired of moveing
141 agree | 133 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
This is very scary and just what the lunatic running is hoping for. Man, Baltimorons.
146 agree | 126 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Lord have mercy on Baltimore. William Donald Schaefer isn't running! It is Mike Schaefer!
143 agree | 126 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree