Federal sentencing guidelines call for a maximum of five years behind bars and a $250,00 fine for the one count of conspiracy Vick pleaded guilty to Monday. Prosecutors, however, asked for 12 to 18 months in court documents. Hudson, known for handing out tough sentences, questioned Vick several times during Monday’s hearing to make sure the quarterback understood the judge’s discretion.
“You’re taking your chances here,” Hudson told Vick before accepting the plea bargain. “You’ll have to live with whatever ruling I make.”
Hudson’s decision will be based on a report from a federal probation officer and any evidence presented during the Dec. 10 sentencing hearing.
Federal prisoners have no chance at parole, Hudson said, and are guaranteed to serve at least 85 percent of their sentences.
“If I think you deserve five years, I’ll sentence you to five years and you cannot appeal,” the judge said.
U.S Attorney Chuck Rosenberg said Monday that his office agreed to the plea bargain because Vick and his three co-defendants admitted their actions deserve more than the usual punishment under the federal guidelines, which is no more than six months in prison.
The Dec. 10 hearing will likely take several hours. Billy Martin, Vick’s lead defense attorney, said “the real Mike Vick” would come out during sentencing, “not the aberration” portrayed in court documents.
jrogalsky@dcexaminer.com
Home
Local


SEE THE LATEST ON THIS STORY
Comments
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
It should be noted that serial killers invariably begin by torturing animals before they "graduate" to people. Vick certainly seems to be a sadistic psychopath. That being the case something more than incarceration is in order here. The man needs healing before he is released to human society.
I have to say that I've heard very few calls for leniency, though.
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Is it it just me, or does anybody else see the irony in this statement?
I fully agree that dogfighting is hideous and the people who patronize it or profit from it should be punished, but your moral outrage rings hollow when you propose beating them to death... even if you're using hyperbole.
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate