Examiners

David Pinto
Baseball Examiner
Most Recent Post
What happened to Moyer?
Find the Examiners
writing about your
favorite topics.

Multimedia News

Sexiest older women. How old are they?
20 photos
Actress Kate Walsh poses for pictures after l...
Beautiful people in Cannes
20 photos
Australian actress Diana Glenn poses for phot...
Celebs out and about
18 photos
Actress Lindsay Lohan arrives at the Diesel x...
NFL Sunday
20 photos
New York Jets quarterback Brett Favre passes ...
The best of college football
20 photos
Miami's Graig Cooper scores a touchdown as Ce...

Not looking so great for '08

Aug 28, 2007 12:00 AM (412 days ago) by Phil Wood, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: WASHINGTON
From the way it’s going, the Nats had better hope the Reds don’t pick up the option on Adam Dunn, above, says columnist Phil Wood. He is one of a select few upcoming impact free agents that the team will have a shot at signing this offseason in what is becoming another poor offseason free-agent market.
(Nick Doan/Getty Images)
From the way it’s going, the Nats had better hope the Reds don’t pick up the option on Adam Dunn, above, says columnist Phil Wood. He is one of a select few upcoming impact free agents that the team will have a shot at signing this offseason in what is becoming another poor offseason free-agent market.
WASHINGTON (Map, News) - Part of the Nationals’ “Plan” was to pare the payroll in 2007, and ratchet the dollars upward in the seasons to come. Their $63 million payroll of 2006 was cut to $37 million this season, and the results have been pretty much the same, if not a couple of wins better after 130 games.

It stands to reason that the payroll will increase next year if only by the raises due the players who will return. The Nats also intimated they would be players in the free agent market this fall and winter. That still may be the case, but don’t look for anything in the way of impact players heading this way.

The list of prospective free agents in baseball this next offseason is somewhat less than inspiring, and it would be no surprise if Washington ends up on the sidelines. Looking at it by position, it’s almost depressing. There’s not a single first baseman that comes even remotely close to Dmitri Young in terms of offense. The available second basemen and shortstops are all either too old or backup quality. You’re not looking to replace Ryan Zimmerman at third, and I suspect that if Alex Rodriguez is thinking of opting out of his deal, he’s brushing up on his ABC’s: Anaheim, Boston and Chicago. The Nats’ catching situation is pretty well settled with Brian Schneider and Jesus Flores, so Pudge Rodriguez and Jorge Posada are off the board.

The most intriguing outfielders coming onto the market are Torii Hunter and Aaron Rowand, though Rowand is rumored to be closing in on a new deal with the Phillies. Hunter is 32 — perhaps a bit older than Washington prefers — but is still in his prime, and is a legitimate five-tool guy. Again, I doubt he’d give the Nats much consideration, but players of his caliber sell tickets, which may be less of a consideration for a team moving into a new ballpark. Adam Dunn, who was nearly acquired by GM Jim Bowden at the trading deadline, may also be available (he’s got a club option for 2008 — but at $13 million), and I’m admittedly a fan of ex-Nat Brad Wilkerson, who’s got some versatility and doesn’t seem to be in Texas’ plans for the future. His power numbers are up this year, but he’s in a hitter’s ballpark.

This story continues below
Advertisement

I really don’t see any compelling names among the free agent starting pitchers. Freddy Garcia? Kyle Lohse? Jason Jennings? Carlos Silva? If you’re looking for upgrades over what’s already here, I doubt you’ll find them. (Curt Schilling is in his 40’s and will want eight figures — I don’t think so.) Relievers? Francisco Cordero is currently a top-tier closer. I suspect Todd Jones stays with Detroit, ditto Joe Nathan with Minnesota. If he doesn’t want an arm and a leg, I might take a chance on a project like Kerry Wood.

The 2008 Nats will look an awful lot like the 2007 edition, but it won’t be for lack of desire. They want to spend money to upgrade the roster, but they’re not going to throw money down the drain for some second division-quality players.

That’s not part of the “Plan”.

Hear Phil Wood Saturdays at 10 a.m. on SportsTalk 980 AM and weekly on Comcast SportsNet’s WPL through the World Series.

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

6:33 PM MST on Sun., Apr. 27, 2008 re: "‘The 21st Century Ripken’"

Examiner Reader said:
There are many Nationals fans who are still patient with the team. I remember how Edward Bennett Williams as well as Peter Angelos tried---and failed---to build a winner with the Orioles by buying free agents. But my biggest nightmare is that once Zimmerman's contract runs out, he will sign a lucrative deal with another club because (a) the Lerners are unwilling to pay the money to keep him when they have the chance, (b) Zimmerman has no faith that the franchise will become a playoff contender anytime in his career, or (c) all of the above. Maybe the Lerners are smart by forcing Zimmerman to prove his worth this year, but if he has a breakout year and then flies the coop like Alfonso Soriano, fans' faith in The Plan will vanish like the wind. Edward J. Cunningham Rockville, MD

4 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

2:00 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 22, 2008 re: "Don’t panic yet"

Examiner Reader said:
Gee, Phil, thanks. I'm glad you reminded us that we're all raving idiots and that you have been appointed by MENSA to set us straight. "It’s perfectly plain that the issue is offense." I'm glad we have an "expert" like you to tell us this. Hm. All along, I thought the problem was that Nationals Park doesn't have enough cupholders!!!

7 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:34 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 22, 2008 re: "Don’t panic yet"

Examiner reader said:
Phil, is it ok for fans who call in to your radio show to comment on the Nats' play? Or are they also ignorant folks who know nothing about facts or logic?

4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:18 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 22, 2008 re: "Don’t panic yet"

Examiner reader said:
What an arrogant, condescending column this is. Fans shouldn't comment about and criticize the team because they don't know enough about baseball? Fans don't know what's going on in the dugout or in the clubhouse? Well why don't you tell us then, Phil, and disabuse us of our shallow, uninformed nonsense. And most fans agree that Lenny Harris did a terrific job last year? Really? Maybe it is you who is uninformed, Phil. (And anyway, who cares what the uninformed *fans* think?) Did you know that the Nats came very close in the offseason to not retaining Harris because they thought that he did not do a good job and was not ready to be a major league hitting coach?

9 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:59 PM MST on Thu., Dec. 13, 2007 re: "New park feels like home already"

natsbaseball.com said:
Thanks Phil. Sounds wonderful - can't wait to see it. Being about the same age I remember attending the first baseball game at DC Stadium after experiencing Griffith for one or two seasons as a young child. It was a world of improvement over the falling down older park. After baseball returned 34 years later and about 15 years of going to Camden, RFK was, of course, kind of stark (I think is was designed by Joseph Stalin) but we all knew it was temporary and to have a home team again we would have put up with a lot worse. My only regret is the new stadium is in a location that couldn't be harder to get to for most of the area's fans. People are whining about the lack of parking - but it doesn't matter as there are no roads. Metro is bragging about being able to carry about 10,000 fans and hour. Since most of the 41,000 fans who could show up will have to go by metro - I cringe at the 4 hour trips it will take to get home. In that regard RFK had it all over the new park.

103 agree | 97 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:20 AM MST on Wed., Oct. 3, 2007 re: "Expect Bowden, Nats to make significant noise in the offseason"

kjack said:
Another great article Phil. Why those idiots at espn[The world wide leader in crap]and fox don't hire informed,aware, and intelligent individuals like you. To inform the general public of the things that really matter in baseball. I'll personalll never understand.

191 agree | 214 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:02 AM MST on Tue., Oct. 2, 2007 re: "Expect Bowden, Nats to make significant noise in the offseason"

EdDC said:
Phil, What do you think of going after Coco Crisp? He is still young and had back to back .300 seasons not long ago in Cleveland. Nats need a CF. Crisp didn't do much in BoSox pressure cooker, like Wily Mo Pena. So Crisp might benefit from just relaxing, knowing the world is not on his shoulders. His contract is reasonable: Covelli Crisp of 3 years/$15.5M (2007-09), plus $8M 2010 club option As to Bowden, I like him asking for the world. He tries hard and contacts many many teams, and if one or two bite, then Nats come out ahead. This is better than just trading to make trades.

244 agree | 227 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:12 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 11, 2007 re: "Perhaps it’d be better to keep Young around"

Pope John Paul Ringo George said:
"Did you ever hear any specific player’s names that would’ve ended up here in exchange for the Fonz?" This is a poor argument. The reason the Nats never get serious offers in trade for Soriano, Dmitri, Cordero, Rauch, etc is becuase Bowden's asking price is not serious. He makes it known that you can only trade for a Nat if you're willing to be ripped off in the trade. His asking price starts so high, teams won't even attempt to negotiate with him. Then he comes back and says "hey, we never got any serious offers!" No sane, competent GM will ever trade with him on anyting above replacement level players.

278 agree | 230 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:47 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 27, 2007 re: "Orioles could repeat managerial history with Trembley"

Norm said:
Trembley has got this team behind him. I like his vision. You can see it in the way this team is playing since he replaced Perlozzo. The Weaver like experience you cite nails it and is a huge bonus. It's precisely what the O's need to get to the next level. The way I see it, NONE of the other current candidates brings anything comparable to the table. With McPhail and Trembley, we are already on the right track.

303 agree | 799 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:52 PM MST on Wed., May. 30, 2007 re: "A long, winding road from Baltimore"

Examiner Reader said:
I agree in that the Orioles should trade for Teixeira. There will be many teams after him. The "Dallas News" has an article that Boston, Dodgers, and Tigers may be interested. We should offer Cabrera, and two other players. Texas needs a starting pitcher. In the article he says the other teams would offer a pitching prospect. At least Cabrera has pitched in the majors the last three years. The Orioles would be set for the next 8 years at first base. That would be a nice infield. Also, go get Torri Hunter next year in free agency for center field.

350 agree | 262 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:07 PM MST on Wed., May. 2, 2007 re: "O's game gives umps a black eye"

Dan said:
So is MLB saying that the score of a game has no impact on strategy? As far as Jay's comment: "The rules were followed." I don't think I ever read anywhere in the MLB rule book where you can score a run while you are on defense. The apeal was not that the run should not count, but that it is not fair to the Tribe that the run was awarded 3 innings after the fact. Contrary to MLB I beleive that the score of the game is the #1 item that determines strategy. The Tribe was denied 3 innings of basing their strategy on the current situation. my thought is that the game should be continued from the point where the controversial run scored, with Baltimore leading 3 to 1. In every other instance I can recall you must apeal a decision before the next pitch. Runner leaves too early when tagging up. Appeal has to be made before next pitch. G Brett's infamouse non home run? Had to be apealed before next pitch. Same for runner missing a base. O's did not raise issue for 3 inn, but thats O

298 agree | 286 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:21 AM MST on Wed., May. 2, 2007 re: "A black eye for umps"

Jay said:
The run counted, why are you crying? The rules were followed, and the Indians are tryng to get by on a technicality, shame in them...very unsportsmanlike

387 agree | 300 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement