Multimedia News

Hollywood's hottest cougars
20 photos
Mariah Carey is 10 years older than her husba...
'Twilight' Mania
20 photos
In this image released by Summit Entertainmen...
Thanksgiving recipes
20 photos
Food & Drink Examiners are sharing a cornucop...
Hugh Jackman: Sexiest Man Alive (and a few close seconds)
20 photos
In this Nov. 10, 2008, file photo, actor Hugh...
Blondes vs. Brunettes
20 photos
Beyonce is photographed in New York on Thursd...

Developers sue city after partnering with it

Aug 21, 2007 12:00 AM (459 days ago) by Mike Silvestri and Matthew Santoni, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: Aberdeen, Md.
Aberdeen, Md. (Map, News) - A corporation fighting alongside Aberdeen to develop a residential community on Wetlands Golf Course is suing the city, claiming officials have not moved fast enough on the project.

Wetlands LLC has filed a cross-claim against Aberdeen because the city has not moved forward on the developer’s request last year to expand city boundaries to include new houses, condominiums and apartments that would be built around the golf course. The annexation process is on hold after residents filed their own suit against the city to stop it from considering the Wetlands proposal.

In June, Wetlands attorney Curtis Coon fought successfully to be included as a co-defendant in the suit.

Now that his client is a party in the residents’ lawsuit, Coon is asking the court to make the city move forward with the annexation petition. City ordinances say petitions should be considered by a planning committee within 60 days of the application, but Coon says the Wetlands petition has been sitting idle since Sept. 29, 2006.

This story continues below
Advertisement

“We’re asking the court to order the city to put us through its process, according to its mandated timetable,” Coon said.

City officials say the developers were just trying to force the annexation back into consideration.

Aberdeen City Council President Mike Hiob said the developers were “trying to expedite the process, and we’re stuck in the middle.”

In a referendum in December, voters rejected the city’s first attempt to annex more than 500 acres near Wetlands Golf Course.

After Wetlands filed a slightly different request in September, seven residents filed a lawsuit to keep the city from considering it because, they say, the referendum should have been the final word.

But if the city hadn’t at least considered the second application, it would have violated Wetlands’ constitutional right to petition the government, Hiob said.

Coon demanded that the annexation petition go before the City Council without waiting on a planning commission’s recommendation, as city protocol requires.

“Something has got to get started,” he wrote in the lawsuit.

msilvestri@baltimoreexaminer.com

msantoni@baltimoreexaminer.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

There are no comments available.
Advertisement