Meet the new administration, senators and members of congress and how they plan to affect change.

Los Angeles Examiners

Kevin Allen
Los Angeles Political Satire Examiner
Most Recent Post
Obama vs. Hitler: The debate rages on...
Hunter Stiebel
Los Angeles Political Examiner
Most Recent Post
A California Election Day Prop. Cheat Sheet
 
 

Multimedia News

World AIDS Day: Observing a global epidemic
20 photos
Children from the Andile School choir sing du...
This weekend in sports
20 photos
Venezuela's boxer Jorge Linares, left, exchan...
Holiday gift ideas: Toys, games and more
20 photos
A child holds a newly released mobile phone c...
Black Friday frenzy
20 photos
Early bird shoppers run into a Target store i...
Mumbai massacre
20 photos
A police officer watches the Taj Hotel, Mumba...

Lawmakers clash over bill to expand children’s health plan

Aug 2, 2007 12:00 AM (488 days ago) by Susan Ferrechio, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON (Map, News) - The House was poised Wednesday to pass a massive increase in the State Children’s Health Insurance Program over the strenuous objections of Republicans, who used a stream of parliamentary tactics in an effort to block a vote on the legislation.

Democrats tout the bill as a much-needed expansion of SCHIP that would allow an additional 5 million children to receive health care. Six million currently are enrolled at a cost of about $25 billion over five years.

The program would be funded with a 45-cent cigarette tax and by cuts to Medicare.

Republicans believe the legislation, which increases the five-year cost of the program by $47.4 billion, is far too expensive. Democrats also have added an additional $38.6 billion to the bill for other health-related initiatives, raising the overall cost to $86 billion.

This story continues below
Advertisement

The GOP opposition to SCHIP essentially derailed efforts to pass the fiscal 2008 farm spending bill Tuesday, as one Republican after another offered small cuts in the legislation to pay for the major increases in SCHIP.

Democrats finally pulled the farm bill from the floor.

On Wednesday, Republicans continued to employ stalling tactics, calling several times for votes to adjourn the House. Republicans argued that the Democratic SCHIP proposal would cut off medical care to seniors by reducing funds for popular Medicare programs. The bill, Republicans said, would increase government-run health care and even allow for the inclusion of illegal immigrants because of loosely worded identification requirements.

“What this bill does is open the door for all kinds of other people to be involved in government-paid health care,” said Rep. Dennis Hastert, R-Ill. “It’s Hillarycare all over again.”

Rep. John Dingell, D-Mich., chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, replied that the bill “does not allow one thin dime to be spent on illegal immigrants, nor does it create a government-run health care system.”

The Senate is considering a much smaller SCHIP expansion, which would increase the program by about $35 billion over five years. A final vote on the bill is expected Thursday in that chamber.

President Bush, who proposed an SCHIP expansion of $5 billion over five years, has threatened to veto the House and Senate bills.

sferrechio@dcexaminer.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

6:09 AM MST on Thu., Oct. 4, 2007 re: "Democrats move to override veto of children’s health care measure"

Art B said:
Bush is right. The social security entitlement is broke. The medicare entitlement is broke. So lets create another one, which will soon be broke. We never hear anything about how much this will cost (clue -- lots). There arent enough smokers to pay for it and even if there were, what did they do to deserve this kind of punishment? How many non-payers will get "equal" benefits (I suppose they consider "parents" income to decide who pays, since ALL children are not able to pay by definition). The principal of all govt aid is that the more you "have", the less you "get". So to "get" the most, you need to appear to "have" nothing. What incentive is there for folks to get an education, work hard, and save their money for a better life if its just going to be taken from them and given to folks who have not done these things? Communism 101.

175 agree | 170 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Advertisement