Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
The firms will spend the next 10 years providing information technology services to government customers; all federal agencies are eligible to bid on the contract, known as Alliant. The contract replaces two previous federal IT programs, ANSWER and Millennia, according to U.S. General Services Administration spokeswoman Eleni Martin.
Under the Alliant, each competitor offers a number of services at reduced prices, and agencies choose based on their prices. Martin said Alliant is distinctive from other similar programs because there are a number of different contract structures clients can use. Agencies must request a minimum of $1 million worth of service per order, Martin said.
“It’s a huge win; it’s the largest in the company’s history,” said Shiv Krishnan, chief executive officer of Indus Corp of Vienna. “There’s been a huge void of government contracts given to companies making between $1 million and $1 billion per year and this is a significant opportunity to move from a midtier to a large company.”
The contract award was designed to promote midsized companies in addition to major firms. One such winner is McLean-based Alion Science and Technology Corp., a 3,500-employee company with between $700 million and 800 million a year in annual revenue.
“We’re very excited about being selected; it’s kind of an elite group,” spokesman Peter Jacobs said. “But what’s really exciting to us about this is that the government is looking for more enterprise IT solutions and that’s one of our strengths.”
Below is a list of the firms and where they are headquartered:
Advanced Management Technology, Arlington
Alion Science and Tech Corp, McLean
AT&T Govt Solutions, Vienna
BAE Systems, Rockville
BearingPoint, McLean
Booz Allen Hamilton, McLean
Caci International, Arlington
General Dynamics, Falls Church
Indus Vienna ITS Corp, Arlington (East Coast)
Lockheed Martin, Bethesda
ManTech Fairfax NCI Info Systems, Reston
QSS Group, Lanham
RS Information Systems, McLean
SAIC, McLean
SI International, Reston
Systems Research and Applications, Fairfax
melissa.frederick@dcexaminer.com



Comments from Examiner Readers
9:12 PM MST on Sat., Aug. 9, 2008 re: "Minority contractors complain about bid process"
Report as inappropriate
10:58 AM MST on Fri., May. 4, 2007
re: "Changes proposed to improve Small Business Act"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
He lied about his story
5 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
HR 1873 does not require immediate recertification of companies registered as a small business. This goes directly against the spirit of the Small Business Act of 1953. HR 1873 has absolutely no provisions of any kind that would stop Hundred's of Fortune 1000 firms and international firms that have received federal small business contracts from continuing to receive billions in federal small business contracts until 2012.
480 agree | 380 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree