
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
Not ranked
SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - Voters will have a chance this November to decide whether to funnel more money into Muni and bestow more management powers to the agency that oversees the ailing transit system.
In a vote of 7-4 on Tuesday, the Board of Supervisors put on the Nov. 6 ballot the so-called Emissions Reduction and Transit Reform Act of 2007, which was introduced by Board of Supervisors President Aaron Peskin.
Under the proposal, Muni would receive an additional 40 percent of the parking revenue each year, for a total of 80 percent, which is expected to provide the system with at least an additional $26 million annually.
It would also change the salary-setting formula for Muni drivers. Drivers’ salaries would be calculated the same way, but a cap would be removed to allow for pay-for-incentives.
The proposal would also grant more autonomy to the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency while decreasing the board’s influence over the agency.
The proposal also includes a parking provision that would not allow parking to exceed restrictions without a vote by at least nine members of the Board of Supervisors. It is a counter-measure to a charter amendment backed by downtown businesses.
Mayor Gavin Newsom withdrew his support of the measure because of the parking provision.
Each day until voters go to the polls Nov. 6, The Examiner lays odds on local figures beating Mayor Gavin Newsom. Check out our exclusive blog: San Francisco's Next Mayor?
Not ranked |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
|
Sports
Business |
Real Estate Family Movies and Books Venues, Sports and Music Concerts, Artists and Tickets Be Inspired - Quotes and Stories |
Comments from Examiner Readers
1:27 AM MST on Thu., Aug. 2, 2007 re: "Voters to decide if parking funds go to Muni"
Report as inappropriate
6:26 PM MST on Wed., Aug. 1, 2007
re: "Voters to decide if parking funds go to Muni"
Report as inappropriate
3:54 PM MST on Wed., Aug. 1, 2007
re: "Voters to decide if parking funds go to Muni"
Report as inappropriate
11:42 AM MST on Wed., Aug. 1, 2007
re: "Voters to decide if parking funds go to Muni"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
Just another way to satisfy the money hungry politicians and bureaucrats in city hall. Off with their heads!
115 agree | 123 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I hope this fails to pass. Muni does not need both the restructuring and the money because no matter how much money is funneled in, Muni won't improve. Let's face the reality here.
136 agree | 158 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I hope this passes. Muni needs both the restructuring and the money. Too bad the Mayor isn't smart enough to support it. He withdrew support because it changes the city charter which would override his republican friends efforts to glut the city with parking spaces. This is a funding shift, not a tax increase.
138 agree | 125 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
just another back door attempt to raise our taxes when the city already budgets 6 billion dollars to support a city of less than 60 sq. miles in size.
153 agree | 137 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree