
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
Article History BALTIMORE (Map, News) - Think twice before paying and shredding that recent Comcast bill.
Officials in Montgomery and Howard counties warned subscribers about an upcoming change to the terms of their agreement with the cable television provider. The change limits customers’ rights to sue the company if they don’t make the effort to opt out of the new policy.
“We are concerned that subscribers will unknowingly give up some of their consumer rights by failing to opt out in time,” Jane Lawton, Montgomery County’s cable administrator, said in a statement. “Comcast customers need to know that they do not have to accept this unilateral change in terms of their service.”
The cable television giant included with bills sent to subscribers in July a “Comcast Arbitration Notice.” The notice informs customers that an upcoming agreement change denies the right to take the company to court, bars class-action suits and requires disputes to go to arbitration.
Customers may, however, opt out of the arbitration policy by visiting Comcast’s Web site or by writing a letter to the company within 30 days of receiving the notice.
“On the surface, arbitration sounds like a good thing, but Comcast’s proposed change is one-sided,” Lawton said.
Howard County officials urge county Comcast subscribers to “carefully review” the arbitration notice.
“We want the customers to make a decision rather than accept the terms of the contract that Comcast wants,” said Stephen Hannan, administrator of the Howard County Office of Consumer Affairs.
Comcast prefers to quickly resolve customer concerns without the need for litigation or arbitration, said Aimee Metrick, a Comcast spokeswoman. Arbitration has been a part of the company’s terms of service for several years throughout various service areas.
“Arbitration is generally a faster, less formal and less expensive process to resolve disputes than litigation,” Metrick said. “Comcast’s policy is customer-friendly and clearly specifies the choices customers have for resolving disputes.”
The speed and cost of today’s judicial system has made arbitration an appealing alternative for businesses, said Byron Warnken, a professor at the University of Baltimore School of Law. Arbitration “better serves the little guy” when disputing a large firm like Comcast.
“This is really a wave, really a trend in which more and more businesses are electing to move disputes through arbitration,” Warnken said.
Comcast services more than 24 million cable television customers nationwide, including more than 150,000 in Montgomery and more than 70,000 in Howard.
Comcast released second-quarter 2007 results last week. Profits increased 28 percent to $588 million in the second quarter, compared with $460 million in the same period last year.
acannarsa@baltimoreexaminer.com
Not ranked |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
ARTICLE HISTORY |
Sports
Business |
Real Estate Family Movies and Books Venues, Sports and Music Concerts, Artists and Tickets Be Inspired - Quotes and Stories |
Comments from Examiner Readers
11:28 AM MST on Fri., Feb. 22, 2008 re: "Comcast monopoly may face challenges"
Report as inappropriate
8:26 AM MST on Fri., Feb. 22, 2008
re: "Comcast monopoly may face challenges"
Report as inappropriate
6:15 AM MST on Fri., Feb. 22, 2008
re: "Comcast monopoly may face challenges"
Report as inappropriate
5:41 AM MST on Fri., Feb. 8, 2008
re: "Montgomery County fines Comcast nearly $13,000 following service complaints against cable giant"
Report as inappropriate
12:46 AM MST on Thu., Dec. 6, 2007
re: "Comcast to raise cable rates starting Jan. 1"
Report as inappropriate
12:45 AM MST on Thu., Dec. 6, 2007
re: "Comcast to raise cable rates starting Jan. 1"
Report as inappropriate
11:29 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 9, 2007
re: "Fairfax Co. warns about Comcast proposal"
Report as inappropriate
11:25 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 9, 2007
re: "Fairfax Co. warns about Comcast proposal"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
8:28 Why The money being placed in the hands of the politicians. More competition. No way that is a Republican ideal Democrats are as crooked as the day is long. I know they say they are for the little guy. They are for lining their pockets Dixon has already taken money. Do you think she is the only one.
97 agree | 95 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Why can the nearby Counties have more than one cable company? Those residents have a choice. Lets face it, Comcast customer service stinks. Get the politics out of it and lets have another provider in the City. The City always has excuses - look at the Counties. When they say they cant and Comcast is the only one that can provide decent service - sounds like someone is getting something under the table. Wake UP. I want Verizon.
103 agree | 98 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Paul Tupelo said:
HAHAHA, i love the part in this where the spokeswoman from comcast said that no company can offer what Comcast offers. I know people with Verizons FiOS and let me tell you, they were blown away by it. The pictures are clearer than Camcast HD because its not going through those damn coaxile cables. Besides, the people at comcast always seem nasty when i call them with a complaint or problem. Lets let someone else more qualified have a go at it. I'd pick cavelier or verizon over comcast anyday but then again, i have no options so i'm stuck with it i guess.
95 agree | 100 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Anthony Grimm said:
It always seems like the bigger the company, the harder you fall. Obivously a company of this size could not be bothered with fines.That's just the cost of doing business. Hiring more employees that follow this same destructive trend of poor customer service is not the answer, either. Cavalier is another service provider in the area and probably a better option. I've beeen using them for some time now and couldn't imagine paying a company to treat me like that. I too, used to complain about their terrible pricing and poor custimer service until I smartened up and switched over to Comcast. Those tpe of problems seem too easy to solve most times.
109 agree | 110 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The programs freeze everyday in Falls Church what did they spend it on bonuses?
138 agree | 156 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
With the absolute worse service they will raise your rates, and people like Kyle McSlarrow pinp for them The mafia bever had it so good in its heyday Only in the Nation's capital area can people get away with this. The most wealthiest county and no competition? This is what you get being sheeples Prohibition had nothing on the cable providers
166 agree | 178 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Jordan Fogal said:
Written Testimony Submitted by Jordan Fogal To The Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law “Mandatory Binding Arbitration Agreements: Are They Fair For Consumers?” Tuesday, June 12, 2007, 10:30 a.m. I would like to humbly thank you for your invitation to speak on the subject of defective housing and arbitration clauses. Those two terms have become tantamount. There are a lot of people depending on me today, because I am a writer, to find the right words and to speak for them. I am charged with communicating their frustration, hopelessness, and the abandonment that they feel. They are not here; but I am, for all of them. There are hundreds of thousands of us, and we are in every state. We realize that everyone thinks their issue is the most important; but when an issue, that affects hundreds of thousands, maybe millions of Americans, goes unmentioned, we feel like subjects instead of citizens. Since your invitation, I have realized something about you and
224 agree | 228 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Jordan Fogal said:
No one will mention the real reasons for foreclosure, like bad builders, substandard construction, or arbitration clauses that protect bad builders and bad lenders. No one mentions we no longer have access to the courts. No one talks about the ridiculous red tape stopping victims and protecting builders: by paid for agencies like the Texas Residential Construction Commission in Texas ... or the other 30 states that are 'right to cure' bureaucratic mazes. The only reason for all the forecloses that is mentioned is subprimes by the stupid people. No, we are not called the stupid people but it is implied. We are for the most part middle class, hard working people, many first time homebuyers, and senior citizens like us. We had a 6% fixed mortgage and we could afford our payments. We just couldn't afford the astronomical repairs to our new Tremont Home/Stature uninhabitable dwelling. There are hundreds of thousands like us. In the great state of Texas, are we going to believe
213 agree | 219 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree