Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
The contracts would pay architectural firms Davis, Brody, Bond, Aedas more than $2.4 million and the Freelon Group more than $2.5 million to design neighborhood libraries in Tenleytown, Shaw, Anacostia and Benning.
The contracts will be announced at a news conference today.
The council is required to approve any contract worth more than $1 million, but the contracts take effect automatically if the council doesn’t act within 10 days of receiving them.
Records obtained by The Examiner show that Fenty’s team submitted the contracts on July 12, two days before the council’s recess and a time when council members were focusing on numerous matters, including the top staff of the stricken schools.
The contracts took effect without public comment last Sunday.
Fenty spokeswoman Carrie Brooks said that “passive review” is common in the District. There were 30 such contracts pending last week, she said.
“It’s not a sneaky, behind-the-scenes kind of thing,” Brooks said.
The four neighborhoods have been without libraries for years, in part because city contracting officials botched the original design contracts. They canceled a previous contract in 2005, after sinking $700,000 in public funds into the projects.
The Government Accountability Office published an audit earlier this year, writing that such mistakes are common because city officials don’t track public dollars in more than $1.9 billion in government contracts.
Documents showed that D.C. contracting officials were willing to pay Freelon and Davis, Brody up to 15 percent of the total cost of building the libraries.
Federal law restricts design fees to 6 percent of construction cost, but the law doesn’t apply to local contracts.
Council Member Harry S. Thomas Jr., who chairs the committee on libraries and whose committee had jurisdiction over the contracts, did not respond to numerous requests for comment.
bmyers@dcexaminer.com



Comments from Examiner Readers
10:14 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 25, 2007 re: "Fenty slips in library contracts without approval"
Report as inappropriate
9:21 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 25, 2007
re: "Fenty slips in library contracts without approval"
Report as inappropriate
9:15 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 25, 2007
re: "Fenty slips in library contracts without approval"
Report as inappropriate
8:52 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 25, 2007
re: "Fenty slips in library contracts without approval"
Report as inappropriate
8:47 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 25, 2007
re: "Fenty slips in library contracts without approval"
Report as inappropriate
8:43 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 25, 2007
re: "Fenty slips in library contracts without approval"
Report as inappropriate
8:07 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 25, 2007
re: "Fenty slips in library contracts without approval"
Report as inappropriate
7:58 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 25, 2007
re: "Fenty slips in library contracts without approval"
Report as inappropriate
meanteeth said:
The contracts are for the four libraries that the previous mayor promised to redesign over four years ago. They have been sitting dormant, and the neighborhoods have been fighting for their resurrection. The libraries redesign were approved three years ago, and the money has been sitting in the budget since then. MORE SHODDY REPORTING FROM THE EXAMINER.
71 agree | 72 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Washingtonian in Training said:
Let me see…hmmmm. Is “passive review” like “finding bread”? (Pardon the pun). Just like Johnny Carson and the Karnak jokes: A: Big Ben, Joe Namath and a Adrian Fenty’s way of governing. Q: What is a clock, a jock and a crock. Look at it this way; we’re finally beginning to see Fenty’s stealth patterns: At the end of the day: Midnight appointments At the end of the Session: Contracts sneaked in At the end of the next month: When the Eastern Market relocation is to occur Let hope he’s got sense enough to know, he’s skating real close to the end of the line on his stealth campaign. Washingtonian in Training
74 agree | 79 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
1.9 billion in government contracts not tracked by D.C. Government officials is irresponsible management.
67 agree | 50 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Taxpayer said:
Mike Licht please reread the article. In regards to your question about how much, it says $5 million. Do you know how many good teachers you could hir for $5 million? This is serious stuff. Heck for that amount you might even get some good principals. Lord knows when the last time one of those was hired.
79 agree | 67 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Taxpayer said:
Fenty's actions are strangely similar to the way Bill Raye runs Horizon Elementary, (what he wants, when he wants.)
70 agree | 65 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Taxpayer said:
Does the DC city council have the round objects required to do anything about this? King Fenty does what he wants when he wants. Another spoiled child of priviledge who thinks he doesn't have to follow the rules.
71 agree | 56 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Mike Licht said:
>Re: Fenty slips in library contracts without approval< 30 “passive review” contracts pending? Yikes. That's the story here. What are they? What is the total dollar amount?
85 agree | 58 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Just more of the same. The only think that changes is the faces in DC
53 agree | 60 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree